Default and Summary Judgments in Debt Cases
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED -- Copy these into the appropriate WP fields, then delete this block before publishing: Slug: default-judgment-vs-summary-judgment-debt-collection Meta Title: Default Judgment vs Summary Judgment in Debt Collection | FL Law Meta Description: Learn how default judgments and summary judgments differ in Florida debt cases. Understand timing, proof requirements, and vulnerability to challenge for faster recovery. Keywords: default judgment, summary judgment, florida debt collection, florida rule of civil procedure 1.500, florida rule of civil procedure 1.510, debt collection litigation, vacate default judgment TL;DR: Default judgments and summary judgments are two distinct procedural paths to victory in debt cases, each with different requirements, timing, and strategic implications. Default judgments arise from a debtor's failure to respond; summary judgments arise from the absence of any genuine dispute of material fact. Understanding which path applies—and when—directly affects recovery speed, cost, and enforceability. Most debt collection litigation ends without trial. The judgment arrives through procedural motion, not testimonial drama. Yet the route to that judgment matters more than many creditors realize. A default judgment obtained when the debtor never answered the complaint carries different procedural baggage than a summary judgment granted after discovery revealed no factual dispute. The distinction governs what evidence must be marshaled, when the motion can be filed, and how vulnerable the resulting judgment may be to later attack. Knowing which procedure applies—and exploiting it efficiently—separates collections that close in months from those that drag for years. What a Default Judgment Is and When It Becomes Available A default judgment arises when a defendant fails to respond to the complaint within the time allowed by Florida law. Under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500, once the time for filing a responsive pleading expires—typically twenty days after service under Rule 1.140(a)(1)—the plaintiff may move for entry of default by the clerk. Once default is entered, the court may enter a default judgment, either on motion or at a hearing if damages require proof. Default does not mean automatic victory. It means the factual allegations in the complaint are accepted as true for purposes of liability, but the plaintiff must still establish the legal sufficiency of the claim and, in many cases, the amount of damages. Florida law requires that damages be certain or capable of calculation from the pleadings. If the debt amount, interest rate, and contract terms are clearly pleaded and supported by an affidavit or authenticated documentation, the court can enter final judgment on the papers. If the amount remains uncertain, an evidentiary hearing becomes necessary. The strategic advantage of default judgment lies in its speed. There is no discovery, no dispositive motion practice, and no need to defeat affirmative defenses because none were raised. But that speed comes with a procedural cost: default judgments are more vulnerable to being set aside. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) permits a court to vacate a default judgment for excusable neglect, and Florida courts apply that standard with some liberality when the defendant shows a meritorious defense and acts promptly. A default judgment is a powerful tool when the debtor has truly abandoned the case, but it must be obtained correctly and documented thoroughly to withstand later challenge. What a Summary Judgment Is and How the Standard Differs Summary judgment under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510 is available when the movant demonstrates that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Unlike default, summary judgment presumes the defendant has appeared and answered. It is a ruling on the merits based on the evidentiary record developed through pleadings, discovery, affidavits, and attached exhibits. In the debt collection context, summary judgment is the preferred tool when the debt is documented, the defendant has no viable defense, and the case has matured past the pleading stage. Consider a hypothetical: a creditor sues on a commercial contract for unpaid goods. The defendant answers and asserts the affirmative defense of payment. During discovery, the defendant produces no canceled checks, no wire confirmations, and no ledger entries. The plaintiff submits an affidavit from the controller, authenticated invoices, a signed contract, and a statement of account showing the balance due. The defendant's response to the motion offers only conclusory denials. That scenario is ripe for summary judgment because no material fact remains in dispute—payment was not made, and no evidence supports the defense. The legal standard for summary judgment in Florida mirrors the federal standard under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Celotex trilogy. The movant bears the initial burden of showing the absence of a genuine issue of material fact. Once met, the burden shifts to the non-movant to come forward with evidence creating a triable issue. Mere allegations or speculation do not suffice. The non-movant must produce competent evidence—affidavits, depositions, admissions, or documents—that would be admissible at trial. Summary judgment is less vulnerable to post-judgment attack than default because it rests on an adjudication of the merits. The court has considered defenses, weighed evidence, and ruled that no reasonable jury could find for the defendant. That record creates a stronger foundation for enforcement and collection, including in cross-border or domestication scenarios where the judgment may be scrutinized by a sister-state court. For guidance on enforcing judgments across state lines, see our article on cross-border debt collection. Strategic Implications: Timing, Cost, and Proof Requirements Choosing between pursuing default and waiting for summary judgment is not always optional, but when both are potentially available, the decision turns on three variables: timing, cost, and the strength of the evidentiary record. - Timing: Default judgment can be obtained within weeks of the answer deadline expiring. Summary judgment typically requires completion of at least some discovery, adding months to the timeline. When cash flow is urgent and the debtor has vanished, default is the faster path. - Cost: Default motions are simpler and cheaper to prepare. Summary judgment requires detailed affidavits, authenticated exhibits, and often depositions to eliminate factual disputes. The attorney time and filing fees are higher, but the resulting judgment is more durable. - Proof Requirements: Default judgment accepts the well-pleaded facts as true but still requires sufficient documentation to establish damages. Summary judgment demands a complete evidentiary showing that would survive a directed verdict motion at trial. If the underlying debt is poorly documented—oral contract, incomplete records, disputed invoices—summary judgment may not be available even if default is. In practice, many debt cases present a hybrid scenario: the debtor answers pro se, asserts boilerplate defenses, and then fails to participate in discovery. At that point, the creditor can move for summary judgment based on the defendant's failure to produce evidence supporting the defenses. The motion becomes a procedural tool to convert a contested case into an uncontested judgment without waiting for trial. Vulnerability to Challenge and the Importance of Procedure Both default judgments and summary judgments can be challenged, but the grounds and likelihood of success differ sharply. Default judgments may be set aside under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) if the defendant shows excusable neglect and a meritorious defense. Florida courts have held that "excusable neglect" can include mistake, inadvertence, or even credible claims of non-receipt of service, particularly when the defendant acts promptly after learning of the judgment. A defendant who moves to vacate within a reasonable time and produces even a thin affidavit suggesting a defense—such as payment, statute of limitations, or mistaken identity—may succeed in reopening the case. That does not make default judgments weak, but it does mean they must be obtained with rigorous compliance: proper service, accurate pleadings, complete affidavits, and prompt motion practice. Summary judgments, by contrast, are reviewed for legal error, not excusable neglect. A party challenging summary judgment on appeal must show that the trial court misapplied the law or that a genuine issue of material fact did exist in the record. Because the defendant already had the opportunity to present evidence and failed to do so, relief under Rule 1.540(b) is rarely available. The judgment stands unless reversed on appeal, and appellate reversal rates for properly supported summary judgments are low. Procedural precision matters in both contexts, but the consequences of error differ. A defective default judgment may be voidable; a defective summary judgment is more likely to be affirmed as harmless error if the outcome was inevitable. For creditors, this distinction underscores the importance of clean documentation and competent motion practice from the outset. Our creditors rights and debt collection services are designed to ensure judgments are obtained correctly the first time, minimizing both delay and vulnerability. The procedural route to judgment is not academic. It governs how quickly the creditor can move to post-judgment collection, how resistant the judgment will be to attack, and what evidentiary burden must be met upfront. In debt cases where the debtor has disengaged entirely, default judgment offers speed. In cases where the debtor has answered but produced no defense, summary judgment offers finality. Both tools are essential, and both demand disciplined execution. Closing Remarks If the debtor has failed to respond and the answer deadline has expired, if discovery has closed and the defendant has produced no evidence supporting claimed defenses, or if the case is stalled and a procedural motion could resolve it in weeks rather than months, the path to judgment is open—but only if pursued correctly. Marcadis Law Firm has spent nearly fifty years obtaining default judgments, summary judgments, and every variety of collection-related order in Florida courts, and we know how to build a record that holds. Contact us today for a case evaluation. Frequently Asked Questions Can a creditor get a default judgment if the debtor files an answer at the last minute? No. Once a responsive pleading is filed within the time allowed by the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, default is no longer available. Even an answer filed on the final day of the response period defeats a motion for default. At that point, the case proceeds as contested, and the creditor must either pursue settlement, engage in discovery, or file a motion for summary judgment if the answer fails to raise genuine factual disputes. How does a court determine damages in a default judgment hearing? When damages are not certain or capable of mathematical calculation from the face of the complaint, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(c) authorizes the court to conduct a hearing to assess the amount. The plaintiff presents evidence—typically through affidavits, invoices, contracts, and account statements—and the court determines the damages without the defendant's participation. While the defendant's liability is established by the default, the amount owed must still be proven to the court's satisfaction, and speculative or unsupported claims will be denied. Can a summary judgment be entered before discovery is complete? Yes, but only if the movant can demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact exists based on the existing record. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510 does not require that discovery be completed before filing a motion for summary judgment. In debt cases with strong documentation—signed contracts, undisputed invoices, authenticated account statements—summary judgment may be obtainable early in the case, particularly if the defendant's answer contains only bare denials and fails to identify any specific factual dispute. Early summary judgment is a powerful tool when the record is already complete. What happens if a debtor successfully vacates a default judgment? If the court grants a motion to vacate under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b), the case returns to active litigation. The defendant must file an answer raising defenses, and the case proceeds through discovery and motion practice as if the default had never been entered. The creditor does not lose the underlying claim, but the procedural advantage is gone. Time and legal fees increase, and the debtor gains the opportunity to assert defenses, engage in discovery, and potentially delay judgment. That risk makes procedural correctness critical when obtaining the default in the first place. References - Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500 – Defaults and Final Judgments Thereon (Verified) - Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.140 – Defenses (Verified) - Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 – Relief from Judgment, Decrees, or Orders (Verified) - Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510 – Summary Judgment (Verified) - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 – Summary Judgment (Verified) Read the full article