Pisanosaurus mertii (as a silesaurid)
fiber-pen illustration + digital painting
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from Israel
seen from Germany
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from France

seen from Malaysia
seen from Japan
seen from China
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Mexico
seen from Vietnam
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from Vietnam
Pisanosaurus mertii (as a silesaurid)
fiber-pen illustration + digital painting
Last week I mentioned the one oddball dinosauriform that had crocodilian-like osteoderm armor, so let's take a look at that one too.
Lewisuchus admixtus lived in what is now northwest Argentina during the late Triassic, around 236-234 million years ago. About 1m long (3'3"), it was an early member of the silesaurids – a group of dinosauriforms that weren't quite dinosaurs themselves, but were very closely related to the earliest true dinosaurs.
(They've also been proposed as instead being early ornithisichians, but we're not getting into that today.)
Much like its later silesaurid relatives Lewisuchus had a long neck and slender limbs, and was probably mainly quadrupedal, possibly with the ability to briefly run bipedally to escape from threats. Its serrated teeth suggest it was carnivorous, likely feeding on both smaller vertebrates and the abundant insects found in the same fossil beds.
Uniquely for an early dinosauriform it also had a single row of bony osteoderms running along its spine. Although it lived at close to the same time as the similarly-armored Mambachiton their last common ancestor was at least 10 million years earlier, and no other early dinosaur precursors with osteoderms are currently known – so this was probably a case of Lewisuchus independently re-evolving the same sort of feature.
—
NixIllustration.com | Tumblr | Patreon
a very fuzzy herrerasaurus
Artwork by @drawingwithdinosaurs
what's THIS dinosaur(iform)
Diodorus
Eucoelophysis
Kwanasaurus
Lutungutali
Sacisaurus
Silesaurus
Technosaurus
Silesaurus opolensis here was a type of dinosauriform – a reptile very closely related to the ancestors of true dinosaurs, but not quite actually a dinosaur itself.
Living in Poland during the Late Triassic (~230 million years ago), it was a quadrupedal animal roughly the size of a large modern dog, about 50cm tall at the shoulder (1'8") and 2m long (6'6"). The front of its lower jaw was toothless and covered with a keratinous beak, and there may have been a corresponding much smaller beak at the very tip of its upper jaw, too.
It was originally thought to be a herbivore, but coprolites full of insect remains suggest it was probably more of an omnivore, possibly foraging by pecking in a convergently similar manner to its distant bird cousins.
In fact, one of those pieces of Silesaurus poop was recently found to preserve a new species of tiny beetle in incredible detail.
———
Nix Illustration | Tumblr | Pillowfort | Twitter | Patreon
Pisanosaurus mertii from the Late Triassic of Argentina (~228-216 mya).
Known only from a partial skull and a few pieces of its skeleton, this 1m long animal (3′3″) is usually considered to the be the earliest known member of the ornithischian dinosaurs -- but some recent studies have thrown that into question, suggesting that it might not even be a dinosaur at all.
Instead it may have been a member of the silesaurids, Triassic dinosauriforms that were close cousins to the dinosaurs but not quite true members of the group. Small and lightly-built, silesaurids had long front limbs and may have been at least partially quadrupedal, and some showed evidence of herbivory with beaks at the tips of their snouts.
Of course, if the “oldest ornithischian” is actually a silesaurid, we’re left with no fossil record at all for ornithischians until the start of the Jurassic. And that brings back up the controversial question of where they actually originated...
Okay whoever used a pigeon to indicate theropods on the “Dinosauriformes” wikipedia page got a laugh out of me, because it’s technically correct, but not quite what you think of when you hear the term “Theropod”.
Can we talk about Dinosauriforms more? Please?
THOSE WEIRDOS ARE AMAZING