Discover Top Posts Tagged with #dvso

#versus #vs #dvso . (hier: Potsdam, Germany) https://www.instagram.com/p/CM2f19KjkxO/?igshid=1aay5238jjro9

Victim Card overspend II

Take a close look at the top right hand corner of the email in the grab. It's from 2012. Again a graphic demonstration of DVSO victim card playing. "the stalking story of the century" was that the one before you were landed with a £70k court costs bill for stalking and harassing a female ?

#DVSO

Overspent on the victim card

This tells me several things

(a) they received notification of the cease and desist open letter

(b) they have no intention of ceasing their behaviour

(d) they are professional victims who have overspent on their victim card

(e) they have NO idea of how the legal system really works (which I knew before anyway but it proves the point admirably)

Even better it was PRECISELY the reaction expected. Job done. It's Writs btw. You threaten people with them DVSO we counter - it's that simple. No threats to begin with, no problem. Please do pass the email onto the Police then I can counter with all DVSO's threatening and libellous behaviour towards people.

It was hardly threatening. It was a chance to co-operate with cease and desist. Their choice to be stupid about it tho.

#DVSO

DVSO getting the wrong end of the stick - AGAIN.

This graphically demonstrates how they operate. Completely misunderstanding what was being discussed.

This was the tweet concerned re paedo payroll (2nd tweet down in following picture) :

It was libellous in nature - it was SENT to the person she was accusing - the @ mention of Mr McFadyen was very clear. So the DVSO not only owe me an apology but also @KDPEP64 ... DVSO should also retract their comments. I won't hold my breath. Truth trumps their bullshit.

#DVSO

Right to Reply is NOT Right to Defame Character

UK law on Defamation overrules the ECHR article 10 right to expression under clause 2 of that article.

The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.

A "right to reply" is therefore NOT a right to defame someone's character by telling lies about them. Refer DVSO to this Then best get reading up on this. This blog has been published with the pure intention of alerting individuals to the behaviour of trolls such as DVSO who go all out to wreck people's lives and continue to do so despite one of them being a convicted harasser.

It is done in the wider PUBLIC INTEREST. 3rd June 2015 lads. Tick Tock.

#DVSO

Open Cease and Desist letter - DVSO

This is an open letter to the three individuals running DVSO - Mr Robert James Morey (aka Robert Lee), Mr Christopher John Hobby (aka Kris Manalien) and Mr Gerald Coulter.

It follows on from their publication of this on their twitter timeline.

Dear Mr Morey, Mr Hobby and Mr Coulter

If you are represented by legal counsel, please direct this letter to your attorney immediately and have your attorney notify me via comment on this blog of such representation.

You are hereby directed to

CEASE AND DESIST ALL DEFAMATION OF Janette Scharenborg’s and Simon Just's CHARACTER AND REPUTATION.

Both Mrs Scharenborg and Mr Just are is educated, respected professionals in their respective community.

Mrs Scharenborg and Mr Just have spent years serving their respective communities in their respective professions and building a positive reputation.

Both Mrs Scharenborg and Mr Just have learned that you have engaged in spreading false, destructive, and defamatory rumours about both of them.

Under UK law, it is unlawful to engage in defamation of another’s character and reputation. Defamation consists of

(1) a statement that tends to injure reputation; (2) communicated to another; and (3) that the speaker knew or should have known was false.

Your defamatory statements involved numerous public tweets, numerous blog entries based on no evidence whatsoever.

Accordingly, both Mrs Scharenborg and Mr Just demand that you

(A) immediately cease and desist your unlawful defamation of Mrs Scharenborg and Mr Just,

(B) remove the unlawful defamation of Mrs Scharenborg and Mr Just from both your social media output and any blog entries and

(C) provide them with prompt written assurance within ten (10) days that you will cease and desist from further defamation of both Mrs Scharenborg’s and Mr Just's character and reputation.

You may do so by leaving suitable comment on this blog entry which will be published to confirm your intention to cease and desist.

If you do not comply with this cease and desist demand within this time period, both Mrs Scharenborg and Mr Just are entitled to seek monetary damages and equitable relief for your defamation.

Any further threats or defamation of Mrs Scharenborg and Mr Just during the 10 days following this notice will represent a refusal to cease and desist.

In the event you fail to meet this demand, please be advised that both Mrs Scharenborg and Mr Just have stated that they will both pursue all available legal remedies, including seeking monetary damages, injunctive relief, and an order that you pay court costs and attorney’s fees. Your liability and exposure under such legal action could be considerable. Any liability may therefore involve further costs towards yourselves including legal charge on any property you may hold.

Before taking these steps, however, both Mrs Scharenborg and Mr Just wished to give you one opportunity to discontinue your illegal conduct by complying with this demand within ten (10) days i.e. 3rd June 2015.

This one opportunity therefore represents your chance under the Alternative Dispute Resolution rules for such action.

I recommend that you consult with an attorney regarding this matter.

#DVSO

How much Money do DVSO STILL owe ?

That's at least £355 + the earlier stuff re software purchase. She's still waiting for the money back. Also don't forget DVSO are repaying a court bill of £70k in £40 monthly instalments. Don't forget they've conned more than one individual out of money too. Very Poor Losers. (in more ways than one)

#Morey #Hobby #DVSO

Mr Bitchy is a Fibber Wibber

The evidence is stacked against DVSO so what do they do ? Mr Bitchy (Robert Morey) comes out (!) with more lies to Jimmy Jones and his sock puppet @stilljenniejen. Peter Tatchell was clearly contacted by Morey this morning attempting to belittle Mrs Scharenborg - he did so without any provocation. Mr Tatchell has NOTHING to do with DVSO's ongoing spat with Mrs Scharenborg nor this blog. DVSO attempting to drag Mr Tatchell into their games is another sick example of how they behave. I've previously documented their attempts to drag Mr Tatchell in and frankly it's childish, immature and nuts. They are now attempting to deflect their own behaviour onto other people. Classic troll mirrorring. Mr Tatchell is free as everyone else is to verify the claims made in this blog independently, however he and others will find this blog does not manufacture evidence (unlike some - mentioning no names DVSO (!)). DVSO have been found out again. They admitted earlier the @daveyrhondda account is Jones. It's about the only thing they have got right today.

p.s. it's Ben and Jerry. Gerry is the name of your boss.

#Morey #Jones #DVSO