PRC leaders if they were historical Chinese emperors:
Mao Zedong: Great millitary strategist, later less effective as a statesman and paranoid towards his court. Would get at least a couple eunuchs slaughtered in over the top fashions. People will mostly remember the first part and ignore the second. Closest historical analogue: Hongwu Emperor (red turban rebellion leader)
Deng Xiaoping: Very good statesman with some micro-managereal tendencies. Would mingle with the common folk and low level officials a lot. The population would casually grow by like 1/3 during his tenure without anyone noticing. Would conquer some small nearby periphery states cause why not. Closest nalogue: Qianlong emperor
Jiang Zemin: THE SCHOLAR EMPEROR. 100% micromanaging enthusiastic. Will make a big fuss about, like, importing a new strain of rice to cultivate or something. Which in hindsight would actually for real be an amazingly impactful decision, but people would make fun of it at the time. In his time would be seen as unremarkable (and maybe even a little disliked by the army for not doing any conquests), but in hindsight would 100% be the highlight of his dynasty. Name would still be most famous for compiling some hyper influencual text or funding some inventor friend. Closest analogue: Hongzhi emperor. With maybe a little Wang Mang mixed in cause nerd <З
No opinion in xi and hu jintao in this context yet, sorry guys. Oh yeah hua guofeng exists. He would be, like, the clearly less favorite of the princes competing for the throne that gets to rule for a year and then is overthrown in palace intrigue. Pretty chill in the meantime though.