Creativity in the Classroom
Like most of the presenters for TedTalks, Sir Ken Robinson does an excellent job at delivering a thought-provoking presentation while keeping his audience engaged. As Robinson stated in various ways, schools have been known to kill creativity and emphasize a more disciplined mind in our youth. I do believe that kids are more likely to “grow out of creativity and not into creativity” (TED, 2007), and if our schools diminish and/or discard the incorporation of activities that encompass opportunities for students to learn and practice practical arts, then fostering creativity could potentially be a skill that our students never acquire. However, across the globe, it is difficult to imagine that all schools kill creativity in our students, causing kids to only be exposed to academic concepts and skills. I want to believe that there are schools that still value and desire the continuation of a well-rounded education for our youth.
Although, recently, with all of the emphasis on state testing as well as tracking student progress throughout their years in the educational system, it concerns me that as a nation we are not moving in the right direction. Our education system has changed in the last decade, and I foresee it continuing to change as our students’ needs further develop. However, for the sake of our future, will this change occur quickly enough? Robinson states in his presentation that “the whole system of public education around the world is a protracted process of university entrance.” He goes on to suggest “the consequence is that many highly talented, brilliant, creative people think they are not because the thing they were good at at school wasn't valued, or was actually stigmatized” (TED, 2007). Personally, I agree with Robinson, and I do not think that our current system will meet the needs of our future generations, especially in a world so easily accessible to digital media.
Even though our current system does not fully support and/or encourage the presence of creativity, it does not mean that we cannot begin to integrate its importance throughout instruction. As technology continues to permeate our educational system, one can utilize its characteristics during collaboration and innovation. Through the use of technology, creativity can become alive in my classroom in multiple ways. For instance, the students can create a public service announcement (PSA) on the importance of maintaining our watersheds. Opening the door to student creativity is permissible as the students can create the announcement based on their individual interests and connections to their local watershed. In addition, the students have the opportunity to discuss watersheds in ways that they value the most, while enabling the students to design an announcement based on their creative minds. More so, with the global awareness opportunities that digital media provides, the students’ PSAs can now take on a more valuable, meaningful role as opposed to limitations found in more traditional instructional methods.
Another way to foster creativity in the classroom is through the students’ multiple intelligences as Robinson described when he mentioned the value in allowing students to use their own gifts and talents to foster learning. When giving the students a topic, one can leave the door open to them developing a product based on their area of intelligence whether it is music, poems, kinesthetic, spatial, or art, to name a few, rather than telling the students that they have to write an essay, make a poster, etc. Ultimately, as Robinson encourages, we need to provide opportunities where our students are not scared to be wrong like in the innocent minds of our younger generation, and in doing so, one would be amazed at the extraordinary works of art that they create (TED, 2007).
TED. (2007, January 6). Do schools kill creativity? | Sir Ken Robinson | Ted Talks [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG9CE55wbtY&scrlybrkr