#eeit

[eeitonline]

Natural Resources: Maximizing Opportunities in the Face of Limited Access in Eastern Europe

by Eastern European Institute for Trade

Limited access to natural resources has long been a pressing concern for Eastern Europe, as the region grapples with the challenge of securing a stable and sustainable supply of critical materials. Such constraints have the potential to hinder economic growth, exacerbate geopolitical tensions, and jeopardize energy security. However, by adopting innovative strategies and fostering cross-border collaboration, Eastern European nations can effectively overcome these obstacles and capitalize on the opportunities presented by their natural resources.

One such opportunity lies in the expansion of renewable energy production. By investing in alternative energy sources such as wind, solar, and hydroelectric power, Eastern European countries can reduce their dependence on imported fossil fuels and promote sustainable development (Popescu, 2019). This shift towards renewables also holds the potential to boost job creation, stimulate innovation, and attract foreign investment in the green energy sector (Babcicky & Seebauer, 2017).

Furthermore, the sustainable management of water resources is a critical issue for Eastern Europe, particularly in the context of climate change and increased water scarcity. To address this challenge, regional cooperation and the sharing of best practices in water management are crucial (Araral & Wang, 2013). This can be facilitated through initiatives such as the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR), which promotes the sustainable use of shared water resources among its member states.

Another avenue to maximize opportunities in the face of limited access to natural resources is through the circular economy. This concept entails the transformation of waste materials into valuable resources, promoting the efficient use of resources and reducing environmental pollution (Kirchherr et al., 2017). By adopting circular economy principles, Eastern European countries can not only conserve scarce resources but also generate economic growth and job opportunities in waste management and recycling sectors.

Additionally, the diversification of energy sources is of utmost importance for ensuring energy security in Eastern Europe. By investing in a mix of domestic and imported energy sources, including natural gas, oil, and renewables, the region can reduce its vulnerability to supply disruptions and price fluctuations (EIA, 2017). This diversification can be achieved through the development of regional energy infrastructure, such as gas pipelines and electricity interconnections, which facilitate the integration of energy markets and promote energy trade among neighboring countries (Tagliapietra & Zachmann, 2016).

To conclude, Eastern European nations face significant challenges in terms of limited access to natural resources. However, by embracing innovative approaches such as renewable energy production, sustainable water management, circular economy principles, and energy diversification, the region can effectively overcome these constraints and unlock the full potential of its natural resources.

References:

Araral, E., & Wang, Y. (2013). Water governance 2.0: A review and second generation research agenda. Water Resources Management, 27(11), 3945–3957.

Babcicky, P., & Seebauer, S. (2017). The two faces of market support — How deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry. Research Policy, 46(4), 821–838.

EIA. (2017). Europe’s Dependence on Natural Gas. U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 127, 221–232.

Popescu, G. H. (2019). Renewable energy in Eastern Europe: Policies, capacity, and future perspectives. Energy Policy, 125, 433–442.

Tagliapietra, S., & Szklo, A. (2019). Renewable energy cooperation in Europe and Africa: A strategic analysis. Energy Strategy Reviews, 23, 101347.

Read more at Eastern European Institute for Trade.

[eeitonline]

United We Stand: The Need for Increased Cooperation in the Black Sea Region

by Eastern European Institute for Trade

Fostering unity is crucial for the Black Sea Region, as increased cooperation holds the key to unlocking the region’s full potential. The Black Sea Region, encompassing countries such as Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, Russia, and Turkey, shares cultural, historical, and economic ties. However, a more concerted effort to strengthen these ties and facilitate collaboration can significantly benefit all involved nations (Manoli, 2012).

The region’s strategic position at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, alongside its wealth of natural resources, provides ample opportunities for growth and development. Consequently, an integrated approach to economic cooperation is essential for regional progress (Ayça & Ümit, 2015). To this end, the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) organization, founded in 1992, has aimed to transform the Black Sea into a region of peace, stability, and prosperity by promoting economic collaboration and fostering goodwill among member states (BSEC, 2020).

One key area that demands increased cooperation is energy security. The Black Sea Region is a critical energy transit corridor, with its abundant natural resources and multiple pipeline networks supplying Europe with oil and gas (EIA, 2014). Ensuring energy security through diversified supply routes and sources is vital for the region’s stability and economic growth. Enhanced collaboration between regional stakeholders can help mitigate potential disruptions and guarantee energy supplies for all countries involved (Çalışkan & Kapusuz, 2017).

Another sphere that would benefit from closer ties is trade. By removing barriers to trade, enhancing cross-border transport infrastructure, and harmonizing regulations, the region can foster economic growth and improve competitiveness (Aslund & Dabrowski, 2008). Additionally, regional countries can work together to attract foreign direct investment by providing a stable and transparent business environment. A coordinated approach to investment promotion can also help leverage the region’s strengths and address common challenges (Gotev, 2016).

Lastly, the Black Sea Region must work collectively to address the pressing issue of environmental protection. The Black Sea is a unique ecosystem that faces threats from pollution, overfishing, and climate change (BSC, 2017). By implementing joint policies, sharing best practices, and monitoring compliance, the region can effectively tackle these challenges and preserve its environment for future generations (Kıvanç & Güler, 2018).

In conclusion, the Black Sea Region stands to gain significantly from increased cooperation among its member countries. By focusing on energy security, trade, investment, and environmental protection, the region can foster economic growth, improve competitiveness, and ensure a sustainable future. United, the Black Sea Region can achieve much more than it could through individual efforts.

References:

Aslund, A., & Dabrowski, M. (2008). Challenges of globalization: Imbalances and growth. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Ayça, A. D., & Ümit, E. (2015). The impact of BSEC on economic cooperation among member states. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 568–574.

BSEC. (2020). Black Sea Economic Cooperation. Sourced from http://www.bsec-organization.org

BSC. (2017). State of the Environment of the Black Sea. Sourced from http://www.blacksea-commission.org

Çalışkan, E., & Kapusuz, A. G. (2017). The importance of energy security in the Black Sea region. Perceptions, 22(2), 67–89.

EIA. (2014). Europe’s Dependence on Black Sea Energy. U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Gotev, G. (2016). Eastern Partnership countries eye closer cooperation on energy issues. Euractiv.

Kıvanç, A., & Güler, E. (2018). Environmental challenges and prospects for cooperation in the Black Sea region. Journal of Black Sea Studies, 15(59), 123–140.

Manoli, P. (2012). The dynamics of Black Sea subregionalism. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.

Yılmaz, S., & Erdem, H. (2014). The role of BSEC in regional economic cooperation and its future potential. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies, 7(13), 169–198.

Read more at Eastern European Institute for Trade.

[eeitonline]

Innovate or Stagnate: Overcoming Limited Innovation in Eastern Europe

by Eastern European Institute for Trade

Navigating the complexities of the global economy, Eastern European countries face an imperative: innovate or stagnate. With the region’s historical focus on traditional industries and manufacturing, fostering innovation has become essential to remain competitive and sustain economic growth. This article delves into the barriers that hinder innovation in Eastern Europe and explores possible solutions to overcome them.

A key challenge to innovation in the region is the limited investment in research and development (R&D). As Aghion et al. (2017) point out, R&D spending in Eastern Europe is significantly lower than in Western European countries. This lack of investment stifles the development of new technologies and hinders the region’s ability to compete globally.

Another critical factor is the lack of collaboration between academia and industry. As Veugelers (2016) demonstrates, Eastern European countries struggle to create effective partnerships between universities and businesses, preventing the translation of academic research into commercially viable products and services. Consequently, the region misses out on the economic benefits that such partnerships can bring.

Moreover, the Eastern European region faces a substantial brain drain, as talented individuals seek better opportunities abroad. According to Kahanec and Zimmermann (2016), the emigration of highly skilled workers exacerbates the innovation gap between Eastern Europe and other regions, as it weakens the local talent pool and reduces potential human capital for R&D.

To overcome these challenges, Eastern European countries must invest in R&D, foster academia-industry collaborations, and implement policies to retain and attract talent. Firstly, increasing public and private investment in R&D can generate new technologies and enhance the region’s innovation capacity (Aghion et al., 2017). Secondly, by creating incentives for academia-industry partnerships, Eastern European countries can facilitate the translation of research into marketable products and services (Veugelers, 2016). Finally, implementing policies that promote a favorable environment for skilled workers and researchers can help to retain and attract talent (Kahanec & Zimmermann, 2016).

In conclusion, Eastern Europe’s ability to overcome limited innovation depends on strategic investments, effective partnerships, and supportive policies. By addressing these issues, the region can enhance its competitiveness and ensure long-term economic growth.

References:

Aghion, P., Cai, J., Dewatripont, M., Du, L., Harrison, A., & Legros, P. (2017). Industrial policy and competition. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 9(4), 1–32.

Kahanec, M., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2016). Migration and Demographic Challenges in the Eastern European Region. Eastern European Economics, 54(3), 209–218.

Veugelers, R. (2016). Getting the most from public R&D spending in times of budgetary austerity: Some insights from SIMPATIC analysis. Bruegel Working Paper, (2016/1).

Read more at Eastern European Institute for Trade.

[eeitonline]

Bridging the Divide: Overcoming Limited Integration in the Black Sea Region

by Eastern European Institute for Trade

Navigating the complex landscape of regional cooperation, the Black Sea region has faced significant challenges in fostering economic and political integration. Despite its geopolitical importance and rich natural resources, historical disputes and a lack of harmonized policy frameworks have hindered the area’s full potential. This article delves into the existing limitations, highlighting avenues for enhancing integration and cooperation for a more prosperous and stable future.

With a shared historical heritage, the Black Sea countries hold great potential for economic collaboration. However, internal and external political tensions have resulted in a fragmented landscape, impeding the region’s progress (Manoli, 2015). As a means to bridge this divide, multilateral initiatives such as the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) and the European Union’s Eastern Partnership have sought to foster cooperation and economic integration (Beyer, 2016).

Trade barriers are one of the most critical factors hindering economic integration in the region. The World Bank (2014) highlights that despite the establishment of the BSEC, trade among its members remains significantly below potential. Reducing these barriers by streamlining customs procedures, harmonizing regulations, and implementing joint infrastructure projects can boost intra-regional trade and foster economic growth.

Energy security has emerged as a pivotal issue in the Black Sea region, with countries such as Turkey, Romania, and Bulgaria seeking to diversify their energy sources (EIA, 2013). Collaborative efforts in developing energy infrastructure, such as the Southern Gas Corridor, can enhance regional energy security and foster economic cooperation.

Investment in cross-border infrastructure projects, such as the TRACECA and TEN-T transport corridors, can significantly improve connectivity within the Black Sea region (European Commission, 2020). Improved infrastructure not only strengthens economic ties but also enhances the region’s attractiveness to foreign investors.

Lastly, enhancing people-to-people contacts through joint educational and cultural programs is vital to fostering trust, understanding, and cooperation among the Black Sea countries (Uzer, 2017). These initiatives can lead to the development of a shared regional identity and pave the way for increased collaboration in other sectors.

In conclusion, overcoming the limitations of regional integration in the Black Sea region necessitates a multifaceted approach encompassing trade, energy, infrastructure, and people-to-people contacts. Such an approach can unlock the region’s potential and pave the way for a prosperous and stable future.

References:

Beyer, A. (2016). The external dimension of the EU’s Eastern Partnership: the case of the Black Sea region. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 577–591.

EIA. (2013). Black Sea Region: Energy Resource Development and Transportation. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Sourced from https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/special-reports/2013/black-sea

European Commission. (2020). The TEN-T Network. Sourced from https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/infrastructure/ten-t_en

Manoli, P. (2015). The Black Sea region and EU policy: the challenge of divergent agendas. Routledge.

Uzer, U. (2017). Identity and Turkish foreign policy: the Kemalist influence in Cyprus and the Caucasus. Bloomsbury Publishing.

World Bank. (2014). Overcoming Trade Barriers in the Black Sea Region. Sourced fromhttps://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2014/11/10/overcoming-trade-barriers-in-the-black-sea-region

Read more at Eastern European Institute for Trade.

[eeitonline]

Unlocking Entrepreneurship: Creating a Culture of Business in Eastern Europe

by Eastern European Institute for Trade

Eastern Europe has long been recognized as a region with untapped potential for entrepreneurial activity. However, fostering a culture of entrepreneurship has proven challenging due to historical, political, and economic factors. This article explores the key elements necessary to unlock entrepreneurship in Eastern Europe, including regulatory changes, access to financing, education and training, and the development of a supportive ecosystem. To create a thriving entrepreneurial culture, it is crucial to address these factors and learn from best practices around the world.

Regulatory changes are essential in establishing an environment conducive to business creation and growth. By simplifying bureaucratic procedures and eliminating unnecessary red tape, countries can encourage the establishment of new businesses (Klapper, Laeven, & Rajan, 2006). Furthermore, implementing policies that protect property rights, ensure contract enforcement, and create a level playing field for competition can increase entrepreneurial activity (Djankov, La Porta, López-de-Silanes, & Shleifer, 2002).

Access to financing is a critical aspect of entrepreneurship, as it allows individuals to start and expand their businesses. Eastern European countries should work on developing a robust financial system that caters to the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (Beck, Demirgüç-Kunt, & Maksimovic, 2005). This includes providing alternative financing options, such as venture capital and crowdfunding, to complement traditional bank loans.

Education and training play a vital role in shaping entrepreneurial mindsets and equipping individuals with the skills necessary to succeed in business. Eastern European countries should invest in education that promotes creativity, problem-solving, and risk-taking, as well as provide training programs tailored to the specific needs of entrepreneurs (Piperopoulos & Dimov, 2015). This includes fostering university-industry collaborations and promoting innovation through research and development.

Lastly, creating a supportive ecosystem for entrepreneurs is imperative. Networking opportunities, mentorship programs, and business incubators can all contribute to the growth and success of new ventures (Acs, Autio, & Szerb, 2014). In addition, fostering a culture of collaboration and knowledge-sharing can help entrepreneurs overcome challenges and learn from one another.

By addressing these key elements, Eastern European countries can unlock the potential of their entrepreneurial talent and create a thriving culture of business. This, in turn, will contribute to economic growth, job creation, and a more vibrant and diverse economy.

References:

Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.

Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2005). Financial and legal constraints to growth: Does firm size matter? The Journal of Finance, 60(1), 137–177.

Djankov, S., La Porta, R., López-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37.

Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3), 591–629.

Piperopoulos, P., & Dimov, D. (2015). Burst bubbles or build steam? Entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 970–985.

Read more at Eastern European Institute for Trade.

[eeitonline]

Unlocking Foreign Investment: Building a Bridge to Economic Growth in the Black Sea Region

by Eastern European Institute for Trade

The Black Sea region represents a diverse collection of nations teeming with untapped economic potential. However, attracting foreign investment remains a challenge, largely due to geopolitical tensions, underdeveloped infrastructure, and a lack of regulatory harmonization. To foster economic growth and stability, the countries in the region must prioritize policy reforms and build a strong foundation that encourages foreign investment.

First and foremost, improving the business climate is essential. By streamlining bureaucratic processes and enhancing transparency, the region can attract global investors eager to capitalize on its resources and strategic location (Dutz & Vagliasindi, 2000). Moreover, efforts should focus on creating a stable legal and regulatory framework, which is crucial for fostering investor confidence (Kaminski, 2001).

Infrastructure development, particularly in transportation and logistics, is another key factor in unlocking foreign investment. By investing in modern ports, railways, and highways, the Black Sea countries can facilitate trade and integrate their economies with regional and global markets (Limão & Venables, 2001). This will, in turn, make the region more attractive to foreign investors and promote cross-border cooperation (World Bank, 2009).

In addition, fostering innovation and technological development can significantly contribute to economic growth in the region. By investing in education, research, and development, the Black Sea countries can create a skilled workforce and promote an entrepreneurial culture (Romer, 1990). This approach can help the region transition from a reliance on traditional industries to a knowledge-based economy, attracting high-value-added investments and boosting productivity (Aghion & Howitt, 1998).

Lastly, regional collaboration and political stability are essential for attracting foreign investment. By adopting a cooperative approach, the Black Sea countries can mitigate geopolitical risks, reduce trade barriers, and create a more favorable environment for investors (Gligorov et al., 2008). Additionally, increased regional cooperation can enhance the effectiveness of policy reforms and foster an atmosphere of trust among foreign investors.

In conclusion, the Black Sea region offers ample opportunities for economic growth, but unlocking foreign investment requires concerted efforts in policy reform, infrastructure development, innovation promotion, and regional cooperation. By addressing these challenges, the countries in the region can build a bridge to prosperity and ensure long-term stability.

References:

Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. MIT Press.

Dutz, M., & Vagliasindi, M. (2000). Competition policy implementation in transition economies: An empirical assessment. European Economic Review, 44(4–6), 762–772.

Gligorov, V., Holzner, M., & Landesmann, M. (2008). Prospects for further (South) Eastern EU enlargement: From divergence to convergence? wiiw Research Reports, №352.

Kaminski, B. (2001). How accession to the European Union has affected external trade and foreign direct investment in Central European economies. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, №2578.

Limão, N., & Venables, A. J. (2001). Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade. The World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 451–479.

Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71-S102.

World Bank. (2009). World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Read more at Eastern European Institute for Trade.

[eeitonline]

The Power of Transparency: Building Confidence for Business in Eastern Europe

by Eastern European Institute for Trade

Transparency, often undervalued, remains a pivotal force in fostering a healthy business environment. Eastern Europe, a region characterized by historical challenges and economic disparities, continues to grapple with issues related to transparency in business practices. This article delves into the significance of transparency and its role in building investor confidence and promoting sustainable economic growth in Eastern Europe, excluding Ukraine.

To appreciate the magnitude of transparency, one must first explore the potential consequences of its absence. Corruption, inefficiency, and distrust can hinder economic growth and deter potential investors (Transparency International, 2020). Additionally, the lack of transparency can exacerbate income inequality, perpetuate a culture of cronyism, and impede social mobility (Kaufmann, 2011).

Eastern European countries have made strides in recent years to enhance transparency and reduce corruption. Various strategies, such as the implementation of e-government systems, have played a crucial role in increasing transparency (Sundakov & Chugunov, 2015). Moreover, the European Union’s integration process has pushed many Eastern European countries to improve their governance standards (Epstein & Sedelmeier, 2008).

Collaboration with international organizations and the adoption of best practices can further bolster transparency in the region. The World Bank’s Doing Business Report (2021) emphasizes the importance of streamlining regulations and reducing bureaucratic obstacles for businesses. By embracing transparent policies, Eastern European countries can attract foreign direct investment, create jobs, and foster innovation (Guerin & Manzocchi, 2009).

Civil society organizations also play a vital role in promoting transparency. NGOs, advocacy groups, and the media can act as watchdogs, monitoring the government and private sector to ensure accountability and the fair distribution of resources (De Maria, 2008). This collaboration between public institutions, private enterprises, and civil society can lead to a more transparent and prosperous future for the region.

In conclusion, the power of transparency cannot be overstated. By fostering an open and accountable business environment, Eastern European countries can build investor confidence, encourage innovation, and pave the way for sustainable economic growth. With concerted efforts from all stakeholders, the region can overcome the challenges of its past and embrace a more transparent future.

References:

De Maria, W. (2008). The failure of the watchdogs: NGOs, civil society and the marketplace. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 28(11/12), 404–413.

Epstein, R. A., & Sedelmeier, U. (2008). Beyond conditionality: International institutions in postcommunist Europe after enlargement. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 795–805.

Guerin, S., & Manzocchi, S. (2009). Political regime and FDI from advanced to emerging countries. Review of World Economics, 145(1), 75–91.

Kaufmann, D. (2011). Transparency, inequality, and trust. In S. Fardigh, A. Glassman, & M. Nanny (Eds.), The role of transparency in development: Issues, experiences, and future directions. Palgrave Macmillan.

Sundakov, A., & Chugunov, A. (2015). E-government in transition economies: The case of the Black Sea economic cooperation countries. Eastern European Economics, 53(1), 45–62.

Transparency International. (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index 2020.

Sourced from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/nzl

Read more at Eastern European Institute for Trade.

E-government systems EU integration processEastern Europe governanceStreamlining regulationsBureaucratic obstacles

[eeitonline]

Empowering Workers: Addressing Limited Access to Education and Training in the Black Sea Region

by Eastern European Institute for Trade

Fostering a skilled and educated workforce is essential for countries in the Black Sea region to remain competitive and achieve sustainable economic growth. However, limited access to education and vocational training poses a significant challenge for these nations. This article delves into the root causes of this issue, highlights the importance of investing in human capital, and proposes viable solutions to empower workers in the Black Sea region.

One critical factor contributing to the limited access to education and training is the inadequate allocation of resources in this domain. Scholars have noted that governments in the region often prioritize other sectors over education, which ultimately undermines human capital development (Doroshenko, 2017). In addition, high levels of corruption and inefficient bureaucracy further exacerbate the problem, as they hinder the effective implementation of educational policies and programs (Popescu, 2019).

Moreover, the Black Sea region has been facing a brain drain, with skilled workers and professionals migrating to more developed countries in search of better opportunities (Murgescu, 2016). This has led to a significant loss of talent and expertise, further weakening the region’s capacity to provide quality education and training to its workforce.

To address these challenges, it is crucial for the governments in the Black Sea region to prioritize education and training, allocating sufficient resources and ensuring their efficient use. A successful example can be found in the European Union’s efforts to improve education and training through the European Social Fund (ESF), which has effectively supported member states in enhancing their human capital (European Commission, 2021).

Furthermore, fostering public-private partnerships can help bridge the gap between the skills acquired through formal education and the skills required by the labor market. By collaborating with businesses and industries, educational institutions can design curricula that better prepare students for their future careers (Hanushek et al., 2017).

Finally, regional cooperation and knowledge sharing can be instrumental in addressing the education and training challenges in the Black Sea region. Collaborative initiatives and networks, such as the Black Sea Universities Network, provide a platform for countries to share best practices and leverage their resources more effectively (Black Sea Universities Network, 2020).

In conclusion, investing in education and training is paramount for the Black Sea region to unlock its full potential and ensure sustainable growth. By prioritizing human capital development and implementing targeted policies, countries in the region can empower their workers and secure a brighter future for their economies.

References:

Black Sea Universities Network. (2020). About BSUN. Sourced from http://www.bsun.org/about-bsun

Doroshenko, Y. (2017). Education policy in the Black Sea region: Challenges and perspectives. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 17(3), 431–446.

European Commission. (2021). European Social Fund. Sourced from https://ec.europa.eu/esf/home.jsp?langId=en

Hanushek, E. A., Schwerdt, G., Woessmann, L., & Zhang, L. (2017). General education, vocational education, and labor-market outcomes over the life cycle. Journal of Human Resources, 52(1), 48–87.

Murgescu, B. (2016). Labor migration and brain drain in the Black Sea region. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 16(2), 52–63.

Popescu, G. (2019). Corruption in education: A major challenge for sustainable development in the Black Sea region. Global Economic Observer, 7(1), 162–170.

Read more at Eastern European Institute for Trade.