Took years but now have antiâgravityâ similar to Ed Leedskalnin did.
Basically you pool positive electric charge in matter and it starts weighing less , then nothing, then goes up. Â
Think of gravity as electrical charge pulling stuff together. like if you took a ballon rubbed it on a sweater and then stuck it to the wall. the more charge the more pull to the wall. That is 100% analagous to a object that is more heavy ( pull towards the ground).  If you can alter that charge you can alter an objects âmassâ or âweightâ
*perhaps a charged leading edge resulting in small field effect to allow vapor cloud to remain undisturbed on the fastest area of flow on the wing. The vapor cloud traveling sideways off the elevator, may mean the field effect encircles the whole plane.
Miles Mathis: âDemonstrating that the air causes lift is not the same as demonstrating how the air causes lift. We already know it does, and we are seeking a physical explanation. Naming it âthe Coanda effectâ is not a physical explanation. The demonstration certainly does not show that the air adheres to the upper surface of the wing, pulling it up. That would either require the demonstration of some magnetic effect, or of some other effect that can cause attraction or adhering. As it is, we have no such known force, and the demonstration is not a demonstration of such a force. What we see is not a force, it is a motion.
This is beyond incredible, because it means that mainstream physics is no longer explaining lift as a push. It is prepared to consider lift as a pull from above. The old skyhook. The wing is adhering to the air above it.
How did physics reach this pass, where it would allow such nonsense into print? And this is not nonsense hidden away in peer-reviewed journals, this in nonsense being promoted in public, on the number 5 website in the US. It reached this pass because it has never understood its fundamental field. Physics has been blind to charge at the macro-level from the beginning, and none of the conspicuous data in the past half-century has opened anyones eyes. The success of Einstein confirmed to them that the field must be gravity only, and they have stuck to that. But Einstein never told anyone the field was gravity only. He simply provided some new equations for the field. It never occurred to him that the field might be unified already. He didn't ask that question, so of course he couldn't answer it. And no one since then has asked that question. Until I came along, no one thought to wonder if both Newton's and Einstein's fields were already unified. No one thought to ask if there might be two fields under the field equations.
But I have shown that there are. The charge field was hidden in Newton's constant G over 300 years ago. It was hidden in Coulomb's constant as well, and then in the Lagrangian. I have only recently dug it out and used it to solve literally dozens of big, seemingly intractable problems. It solves this one as well. Charge is always arrayed against gravity in the vector equations, which means that it is moving straight up out of the Earth. The Earth is receiving charge from the Sun and recycling it throughout its entire body. This means that everything is being partially lifted by charge all the time. Charge is .1% of gravity, which means that if the charge were turned off, you would weigh .1% more. I have shown that this charge field is what keeps the atmosphere up. In this sense, the lift pre-exists. We don't explain it from the flight equations, we explain it from the unified field equations.
We are told that the A380 holds 85,472 gallons of fuel in the wings, weighing 559,937 pounds, for a total weight of 1,200,000 pounds at takeoff. Is this bridge in Singapore the strongest ever built?
That is the equivalent to 8 x 11,000 tankers shown above. (shown to scale)
âthe fuel from 3 KC-135 tankers can just about fit in the wings of the A380.
--wing flex video link showing 5 meters of flex or displacement at wing tip.
