Earlier today I rewatched the episode “The Late Mr. Kent” from Superman: The Animated Series, which revolves around Clark Kent’s effort to prove the innocence of Ernest Walker. Walker is on death row after being convicted of murder, but he claims he was framed and his sincerity convinces Kent to look into the matter.
There’s a lot going on in this episode, including Clark’s supposed “death” that gives it its title, but one thing that struck me on this rewatch is how easy it is for Clark to find the evidence to exonerate Walker. He manages to prove his innocence in a day. And he does it as Clark Kent, not Superman, with no superhuman abilities or technologies. No time travel to witness the murder, no Kryptonian technology to examine the evidence, just bog-standard human investigation. And it’s not that he’s a super reporter, either, since this was info that could have easily been discovered at the original trial if anybody had cared to look. Despite how easy it was to save him, Walker had initially been convicted because nobody bothered.
That is a repeated point of the episode. Everybody “knew” he was guilty so they didn’t care.
Walker was a small-time crook and repeated thief, and once everybody heard that he had a record they just tuned everything else out. Even -- especially -- his public defender, who never bothered to verify his alibi for the night of the murder.
Which let Detective Kurt Bowman, homicide detective of the Metropolis Police Department and the actual murderer, frame him so easily. He didn’t even try for a complicated frame-up, since he knew he wouldn’t have to. He planted the murder victim’s necklace outside Walker’s apartment, “caught” Walker when he tried to fence it, and that was it. That’s circumstantial evidence at best, but again, nobody cared. They knew Walker was a crook anyway, so what more do you need?
At this point do I even need to point out that Walker was black?