#experiement

[ephemeralwizard]

[indydrawsstuff]

@carlyraejepsans

[aki16official]

Reblog if u hate bossmelon

[oddmon]

Two different traditional artworks of my Wildclaw; Cloud. The first I did with a pencil and soft shading, the second is with a red pen and hatched shading. Wow, the results turned out so differently! This was a fun experiment with different materials and shading styles

[autoeroticalgolania]

Subway Neckin’

[werewolffem]

.

[simonalkenmayeris-still-dead]

Not sure where that last quote is from, but isn’t “Simon’s” hypothesis super biased? He frequently states variations of “you’re not going to believe me because fiction rotted your brains” or “something is wrong with you if you don’t believe my story” (which is obviously an attempt to manipulate readers into feeling stupid for disbelief, but if we pretend it’s not, then it’s just bias).

It's from the current pinned post on his blog. Literally right in his bio, Simon says if people don't take him seriously and think the work is fiction they are "probably not quite right in the head".

I did debunk this a while a go, but since I can't find the post, Simon is manipulating the same uncertainty he claims to be investigating.

In the same way an anti-vaxxer will be like "well you can't be sure vaccines don't have terrible side effects", Simon is setting up this scenario of "well, you can't be sure I'm not a real monster".

The thing is, we can be sure the side effects of most vaccines are so small as to be non-existent for most people, and we can be sure Simon is not a monster precisely because he isn't providing any evidence.

So yes, his hypothesis is super biased and bears more resemblance to a conspiracy theory than any sort of study.