If you’re one of the millions of people pissed off that your choices are Trump or Biden with no real competitive third-party options, I’m sorry, but it’s too late for this election. There won’t be an energetic and unproblematic 40-year-old progressive with massive grassroots support and a deep campaigning budget magically appearing in the next four months.
Trump’s base is as energetic as ever, and conservatives are good at falling in line. Even a narrow Democrat majority won’t stop him. The electoral college is weighted in the Republican’s favor.
It is not enough for Trump to lose. Trump must lose CONVINCINGLY. Otherwise we’ll have to deal with a repeat of January 6 at best, or dictator-for-life Trump at worst.
Unless the reason you’re mad at Biden is because he raised your taxes, Trump is worse on every issue. You hate Biden continuing military aid and support for the Israeli government? Trump moved the American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. He will offer Israel MORE military aid and offer full-throated support for the genocide.
But it’s not too late for the next election. Get involved in your local politics. See what positions you might be qualified for and run for local office. For legal reasons, I definitely do not recommend engaging in civil disobedience or any illegal direct action. I do recommend educating yourself on the FairVote movement and getting involved in whatever election reform campaign you can access.
The point is, figure out a way to DO something instead of trying to stop other people from doing the most effective thing most of them know how to do.
FairVote is a nonpartisan organization working for better elections for all. We research and advance voting reforms that make democracy more
Ranked choice voting is a simple but meaningful change to elections.
Ranked Choice Voting 101
Ranked choice voting (RCV) makes democracy more fair and functional. It works in a variety of contexts. It is a simple change that can have a big impact.
RCV is a way to ensure elections are fair for all voters. It allows voters the option to rank candidates in order of preference: one, two, three, and so forth.
If your vote cannot help your top choice win, your vote counts for your next choice.
Benefits of Ranked Choice Voting
Promotes Majority Support
Too often, candidates win elections despite being opposed by most voters. In elections with more than two candidates, candidates can and do win even when less than half of voters support them. For example, in Maine, nine of the eleven gubernatorial elections between 1994 and 2014 were won with less than 50% of votes. (This was one factor in Maine's adoption of RCV beginning in 2018.)
With ranked choice voting (RCV) for single-winner offices, if no candidate has a majority in first-choices, the candidates in last place will be eliminated one-by-one. If a voter's first choice is eliminated, their vote instantly goes to their second choice. That way, we can find out which of the top candidates has real majority support.
Discourages Negative Campaigning
In non-RCV elections, candidates benefit from mudslinging and attacking their opponent instead of sharing their positive vision with voters. This can lead to increasingly toxic and polarizing campaigns.
With RCV, candidates also compete for second choice votes from their opponents’ supporters which lessens the incentive to run a negative campaign. In RCV contests, candidates do best when they reach out positively to as many voters as possible, including those supporting their opponents.
Voters in RCV cities report more positive campaigning and greater satisfaction with their elections. See our Research on RCV page for more on campaign civility.
Provides More Choice for Voters
Democracy is strongest when more voices are heard.
Often, to avoid “vote splitting” in which candidates win with very little support, efforts are taken to limit the number of candidates who compete. This can manifest in several ways.
In some places, a low-turnout preliminary election eliminates most of the candidates
In other places, restrictive ballot access laws keep out challengers
Candidates are sometimes pressured to stay out of the race for fear of splitting the vote with another similar candidate. This can be particularly true for candidates from groups under-represented in elected office, such as people of color and women.
RCV allows more than two candidates to compete without fear of “splitting the vote” among like-minded individuals.
Saves Money When Replacing Preliminaries or Runoffs
Many local offices are elected in two rounds of elections. In some cases this is a preliminary election which winnows the field to two followed by a general election. In other cases it is a general election followed by a runoff election if no candidate won a majority.
In either case, the election that takes place on a day other than the general Election Day often suffers from weak and unrepresentative turnout, while raising issues of vote splitting in the first round and the possibility of disenfranchising military and overseas voters.
With RCV, a jurisdiction can enjoy the benefits of two rounds of voting in a single, more representative, higher-turnout election. This is why single-winner RCV is also known as “instant runoff voting.”
In this context, RCV can save the jurisdiction a lot of money - the entire cost of a second election - while helping promote majority rule and civil campaigning. This has been the motivation for the adoption of RCV in places like San Francisco (replacing runoffs) and Minneapolis (replacing primaries).
See our Research on RCV page for more on the benefits of RCV over two-round runoffs.
Promotes Reflective Representation
Compared to winner-take-all elections, RCV in multi-winner contests allows diverse groups of voters to elect candidates of choice. This promotes diversity of political viewpoint as well as diversity of candidate background and demographics. Even in single-winner races, RCV can promote the representation of historically under-represented groups.
See our Research on RCV page for more on reflective representation in single-winner contests.
See our Fair Representation Voting section for details on how RCV improves representation in multi-winner contests.
Minimizes Strategic Voting
Voters should be able to vote for candidates they support, not just vote against candidates they oppose most. In elections without RCV, voters may feel that they need to vote for the “lesser of two evils,” because their favorite candidate is less likely to win.
With RCV, voters can honestly rank candidates in order of choice. Voters know that if their first choice doesn’t win, their vote automatically counts for their next choice instead. This frees voters from worrying about how others will vote and which candidates are more or less likely to win.
Increased Participation from Military and Overseas Voters
Protecting the right to vote for men and women serving overseas in the armed forces or living abroad is of the highest importance. Deployed military and other overseas voters encounter particular challenges during runoff elections and presidential nominating contests, largely because of their timing.
Federal law requires states to provide military and overseas voters with ballots at least 45 days before any federal election, but runoff elections require a new set of ballots. Sending a second set of ballots requires an enormous delay, driving down turnout in the runoff election.
In presidential primaries and caucuses, many candidates withdraw quickly after the first few primaries, before military and overseas ballots can be counted. Subsequent primaries may receive military and overseas ballots cast for candidates no longer in the race because those voters mailed their ballots before learning that their favorite candidate left the race.
With RCV ballots, a military or overseas voter can rank the candidates on a single ballot. If a runoff occurs, or if candidates drop out of a presidential contest, the ranked ballot is counted for whichever candidate in the runoff the overseas voter ranked highest.
Five states use RCV ballots to include overseas and military voters in runoff elections: Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina. In addition, Springfield, IL has adopted this reform for local races.
For more information, see FairVote's Policy Guide for RCV ballots for military and overseas voters.
“In most parts of the United States, voters select a single candidate for each position on their ballot, and the candidate with the most votes wins. This is known as single-choice, winner-take-all, which can sometimes result in the election of a candidate who earned only a small percentage of the vote. But that’s not the only way of electing our leaders. Ranked choice voting is another voting method which allows voters to rank their favorite candidates in order of preference. Learn more by visiting www.fairvote.org.”
Maryland’s FairVote: Nonpartisan in Name, Ideological in Practice?
By Michael Phillips | MDBayNews
FairVote bills itself as a nonpartisan champion of democracy, best known for promoting ranked-choice voting (RCV) and other structural election reforms. Founded in 1992 as the Center for Voting and Democracy, the organization has grown into one of the most influential voices shaping how elections are run in states and cities across the country — including…
Soros-Backed Ranked-Choice Voting Comes to Maryland — With Jamie Raskin Leading the Charge
By Michael Phillips | MDBayNews
Maryland voters are once again being told that a sweeping change to how elections are conducted is merely a neutral “democracy reform.” But a closer look at ranked-choice voting (RCV) — and its most vocal champions — suggests something far more ideological, partisan, and centrally planned.
At the forefront is Jamie Raskin, a longtime Democratic congressman and…
The Fair Representation Act Could Reshape Maryland Elections — and Hand Republicans Seats Democrats Have Locked Away for Years
By Michael Phillips | MDBayNews – Annapolis Watch
A national election-reform proposal backed for years by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) is facing renewed scrutiny after modeling from its own supporters revealed an unexpected outcome: under a “fair” proportional voting system, Maryland Republicans — long shut out of most U.S. House seats — would gain meaningful representation again.
The reform…
The Fair Representation Act Could Reshape Maryland Elections — and Hand Republicans Seats Democrats Have Locked Away for Years
By Michael Phillips | MDBayNews – Annapolis Watch
A national election-reform proposal backed for years by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) is facing renewed scrutiny after modeling from its own supporters revealed an unexpected outcome: under a “fair” proportional voting system, Maryland Republicans — long shut out of most U.S. House seats — would gain meaningful representation again.
The reform…
