#fame?

[2-b-art-blog]

The idea of my AU’s having different styles is such a daunting, yet intriguing idea….

[lizzieshort2025]

Lizzie took a chance at catering a 5-start event on the d.l.

Unfortunately she got caught on camera at the event and was fired from her job.

[thxnks4themrms]

People do realize that the nyc blanket couple probably aren’t going to stop because like that’s a kink and that’s why they’re doing it in the first place

[hextina]

when a producer creates a beat and a writer writes lyrics and those things are given to some random vocalist who can't sing (or write or produce), who then becomes the whole entire face & identity of the song in the public eye, what was the point of it all

[crucifornicate]

your famous to me babe

love u too

[tealtheterraincarver]

Actually, I reblogged something earlier today that brought up the Greenwood Massacre, so here's a crash course on that for those who don't know. This's the shit Ryan's trying to revisionist history on.

Content Warnings for racism, violence, death, general stuff you'd find in a racially motivated act of terrorism, cause a lotta it'll be covered in this video.

[purpledragon18]

I really don’t get the bi/pan discourse going on. The side that argues that pansexuality set back the lgbt+ community and erases bi people at least. Like I get it. When I first IDd as panromantic (I already knew I was Ace at that point) it was because I saw myself as interested in people (romantically speaking) instead of being attracted to two genders. I mistakenly though that Bi people were only attracted to men and women, because the definitions I was looking at at the the time were oversimplified, not entirely accurate, and I did not bother to look further into the nuances of the words or their backgrounds. I believe I would still identify as panromatic, if it weren’t for the fact that I tend to favor women and nonbainary individuals so much more than men that I am currently questioning my sexuality again. I would attribute this to the fact that I identified as pan for a long time before I got to this point, but I also believe that my own identity plays into my perception of my own sexuality, especially identifying as nonbianary and asexual.

Again, I am not a direct part of this discourse and don’t have the full story from either side, and I’d sort of prefer to keep it that way. But from what I have seen, it seems like people out there who didn’t understand the Bi identity fully just need clarification about it. I’m sure there’s plenty of assholes out there that have condemned people for identifying as Bi, arguing that they’re only attracted to two genders and therefore exclude or erase people who do not identify that way, or some bullshit like that. And vice versa for Pan people. I’ve seen a lot of posts and people on this site condemning people who indetify as Pan just because they ID that way? Seems kind of fucked up. And obviously I should research this more, cuz I am not at all aware of the history of this particulate discourse. Guess I’m off to do that now.