seen from Sweden
seen from Poland
seen from United States
seen from India
seen from China
seen from Singapore
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Singapore
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China
hello, my name is 「 pyo hyemi. 」 and my chosen word is 「 hope 」 !
the tattoo of your chosen word appears on your nape as soon as your hand finishes the last stroke — you’ve been granted the ability of hope aura, and must follow the guidelines below :
limited to a radius of five feet.
doesn’t work on oneself.
may produce a pseudo-hopeless affect in others by ripping the heightened hope away.
[text] I'm sorry for shouting at you. And for not seeing you off when you left. [text] Take care of yourself when I'm not around.
-receives the texts, hearing the familiar tone of Hyemi's sms messages coming through, makes sure to go to an alternate location than the base, she thinks she should probaably ask if that's necessary or not, and texts her back- -text- I don't blame you for being upset. I completely understand.-text- You take care too. I miss you already.
[text] I walked in on someone playing video games in the student lounge and masturbating to a topless stripper in GTA5
[text] It looked like your roommate. I didn’t linger to check.
She stares at the text a bit longer, nose wrinkling, eyebrows lowering as her mouth opens in gaping disgust.
Well, she likes liked the game. It's out of her reach now and as she reads it over again, she's kind of glad she's not going to be touching the console again. Though there is a sort of sadness which obviously lingers.
But her former rooommate...Calypso? The girl did happen to be rather withdrawn and quiet for someone to do this -though if she had some side weird fetish like this it wouldn't be out of place. Except, she's never seen the female ever in the student lounge and the image just didn't seem to fit well enough for her to let it be.
[text] are you sure it was my roommate?
Was, she no longer dwells in the school anymore.
[text] if you see someone like that again chuck water and if you get some glittery pink fishtail in response then it's her.
Slightly glad right now that she has a method of confirmation when it comes to her roommate.
[text] well what can we expect from a bunch of hormonal teenagers. [text] decency is out of the question.
She knows that well enough through her own adventures.
[text] Look. You're sixteen and she's twenty six. I don't want to know if anything happens; that's ILLEGAL.
[!] looking forward to the reactions when the first group of brotherhood recruits leaves (づ｡◕‿‿◕｡)づ
ME TOO BOO
[ it's been said already but the new layout is so??? gorgeous??? HOW??? ♥_♥ the map is fantastic and brings joy to my detail-oriented heart and the TIMELINE. i might be swooning a little rn.
omf thank you, darling ! any and all feedback (positive or negative or neutral) is welcome, so dw about it ~ (◡‿◡✿) thankyouthankyouthankyou.
I don't have any issue with the activity check being changed; the logic behind it is sound and fairly reasonable. But the way it's been implemented is kind of iffy. /post/83034665109 goes up on the main blog, and just over 3 hours later the new rules are enacted. Seems like the rule change was set to go without any serious intent to consider members' feedback, so like... What was the point of even asking in the first place? :/
First of all, thank you for your input ! Now, I'm going to get right to the point and say that yes, we have been in talks of resolving the issue of loopholes in our AC system for a number of weeks now. We asked for feedback (which we received plenty of, mind you--in answers to our post, reblogged posts, messages and aim conversations) in the span of those three hours and all of the members echoed a similar sentiment of 3/4 days being too short. Considering that our objective was to satisfy all parties involved (including ourselves), we decided to keep the very same rules that were enacted before with a minor change. From what I'm reading, it comes across as if you're assuming that we didn't listen to the members or that we asked and failed to take their answers into consideration. We did, but all the mediums that we used for communication are not visible to all of our community. I'm going to publish this in case anyone else has this question on their minds and hopefully this will ease your doubts. We listened !
