The Gamblers are Jerked Up Occasionally
10 FEB 1885. Austin Daily Statesman.
ABOUT GAMBLING. What a Sporting Man in Austin has to say on the subject.
It is frequently well to get the opinions of all sorts of people. By hearing every side of a question, by listening to discussions from every point of view, the subject can be comprehended in its entirety.
Just now the regulation of gambling is a topic that interests everybody. The present legislature proposes to deal with it. In regard to it the most diverse views are held. One theory is to make it a felony; another is to pass a license law.
Yesterday a reporter meeting up with a well known member of the sporting fraternity, asked his ideas on the subject. The other responded in substance as follows: “Gambling is, I admit, an evil. It has flourished a long time, however, and seems difficult to entirely break up. You ask me what I think of the proposed bill to make gaming a felony. I don’t think it will do. Let them pass this bill and what will be the result? You are doubtless aware that there are various kinds of gambling. Some time ago, the distinction was drawn clearly and correctly in the Statesman. There are men in all cities who run fair games. There are others, so-called gamblers, who are really thieves. Fakirs is the word generally used to designate them. Now, suppose gambling is made a felony. The proprietors of the better class of these establishments will close up. They are not going to take any chances on going to the penitentiary. They will quit the business rather than run the risk of being convicted as felons. But will the fakirs do this? will the keepers of low gambling halls, where drunken countrymen are fleeced, shut up shops? Not by an overwhelming majority. On the contrary these robbers will increase and multiply. They are generally the hardest kind of characters, and are willing to run any risk. The vice, instead of being suppressed will only flourish in an aggravated form. I am not telling you this for buncombe. It is as certain to be the result as the sun shines above us.
But if, on the other hand, gambling is licensed and the tax be put to a sufficiently high figure, only responsible men, men who will be interested in preserving the reputation of their houses for square dealing can engage in the business. This will drive the fakirs out of the business. The licensed sporting men will combine against them, and their occupation will be gone. It will be an easy matter then to enforce the law, for back of it will lie public opinion. Again, the money arising from licenses will swell the revenues of the state to an enormous figure. Why license the sale of liquor and deny it to gaming? Is one any greater evil than the other? They go hand in hand.
As the law now stands, the gamblers are jerked up occasionally and fined. Who gets the money? The prosecuting attorney and the other court officers. The state only gets a part. License it and it is all turned over into the coffers of the general treasury. It then goes to the public good and not to the private purses of its individuals
These are my views, and you can take them for what they are worth. Other arguments might be adduced but the foregoing will do for this time.” So the interview was ended.