Why Strict Parenting is Ineffective in the US
Sex, violence, profanity, and gluttony are few but common themes found within today’s media. Much of our social
interaction revolves around what we are spoon fed by the media. Sex education classes are provided to children as
early as 11 years old. There is no effective way of sheltering a child in this country without nasty repercussions.
A parent can take away the right to watch television and claim the act to be nothing more than a privilege in their
native land, but then the child will be exposed to the same content through word of mouth. A parent can closely monitor
the music their child listens to, but one day some spunky social studies teacher might ask the class to dissect an
exerpt from the most vulgar of rap albums. A parent can monitor how their children dress, but there will always be
that rebellious friend kind enough to share clothing. For every action, there is a reaction.
Strict parenting is fear in the form of authority. Traumatized parents who were not successfully able to work through
their own inadequacies before parenthood often transfer their magical thinking on to their children. First Generation
Americans are at high risk of falling victim to hellicopter parenting being that many immigrant parents manage to mask
their uncertainty with dominance established by misuse of authority. The problem with dominating a child is that
they struggle to develop a sense of self. The goal is to get the child to trust in the parent's word more than their
own because to an immigrant parent, the child is incompetent of caring for themselves in this big, new, scary world
and will need as much help as they can get. What is really occuring is that the parents are often projecting unmet needs
on to their children. Perhaps a parent felt too poorly equipped to deal with the pressures of a new country and wishes
they would have received more help from their caregivers. This frustration is transfered and made to seem as if it is
the child who is struggling and in need of assistance.
Unfortunately, come teenagehood, the average First Gen will have done half of what was forbidden of them AND much much
more. Now, birth order will plays a large role on how wild a First Gen may become once they taste their
first sip of freedom. Eldest children and only children are likely to experiment and dabble while maintaining a sense of
discipline while middle children and younger children are quite vulnerable and prone to developing unhealthy coping
mechanisms. This occurs for a few reasons:
1) The child struggles with low self-esteem and anxiety and feels most
confident when under the influence, in relationships, or being encouraged by peers.
2) The child is angry with the circumstances forced upon them and feels a need to rebel in order to establish a sense
of independence.
3) The child feels that they must blend in to avoid being criticized, bullied, or outcasted.
There is one thing all First Gens need to understand: Experimentation is a natural part of human development and if
that need is deprived, it can have drastic effects. I am not one to bash parents as they are human and learning just
like we are. But I am sorry to say that First Gens will have to fight for personal freedom more than the average
person. Growing up will consist of being the first to do many things, and not without resistance.
It is a gift to have access to a land full of privilege, opportunity, and freedom. But first, we most work hard to open
our minds, expand our horizons, and challenge the conditioned fear passed down from generations before us.
Tread lightly and live fully First Gens!