Jul 22, 2022
the @dceumovies dream is dead too bitches..... 😑😑
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Yemen
seen from Uruguay
the @dceumovies dream is dead too bitches..... 😑😑
I saw what you did there!
Scott Snyder is a Wonderbatso fan
And DC is ready to embrace the couple the way they never did with Superwonder.
This is happening. I guess with the blessings from AT&T/Warner.
I’m starting to regret They didn’t close DC Comics for good, as they said back on December 2019.
Another Batso week.
Batso Day? Try Batso Week. Hell, at this point, let’s skip directly to Batso’s Decade, for time saving.
This is the list of comics released by DC this week. Am I missing something here?
Oh! You think I’m kidding? I’m not.
This is last week’s list. The red crosses mark the Batso and Batso related comics:
Give me a fucking break!
TimmyDg of Deviantart: I was thinking something. In every Non-Dc Superman analogue Lois is either non-factor or doomed failure. In Watchmen Dr. Manhattan-Superman's analogue-was doomed to fail in his romance with two human woman Silk Specter and Janey. Heck John leaves Janey for a younger woman when she gets older. In Millar Jupiter Legacy's Suepy analogue marries Wonder Woman analogue. Thus proving you can't tell a good Superman story with Lois Lane in it. You can only do it Wonder Woman
In Astro City, the Supes equivalent, Samaritan, and Winged Victory of Samothrace, Wondy’s counterpart, were also an item. In Marvel, we have Hyperion and Power Princess (too on the nose?) having an on and off interdimensional romance throughout many years, too intricate to cover in just one seat.
In short: E-V-E-R-Y-B-O-D-Y in the comic industry, except DC idiots, understood the obvious: Superman and Wonder Woman belong together.
They tried to compensate the other obvious thing: Lois is a mortal, therefore, she will eventually die, thus leaving Clark alone and, according to their stupid design, a crazy, murderous despot, so they gave her superpowers, made her immortal via an elixir, even transferring her consciousness to a durable robotic body (talk about sex dolls!), to extend the inevitable as long as possible and making Superman a Lois dependent character, unable to function apart from her beneficial influence and a selfish person who only cares for his own comfort: as long as he gets his way, everything is okay. This, of course, made him a horrible prospect of a hero and doing an enormous damage to the figure of Superman as a champion, to his upbringing, his legacy et al.
On the contrary, when Diana and Clark were together, the couple of superpowered beings turned up to be the most normal pairing: they were sincere to each other, trustworthy, open, generous. Each pushing the other to be better, which made them better together. Their relationship was based on truth, collaboration, sacrifice, if needed. Neither had to pretend being something they are not and none of them will go crazy if they lose the other because they know is part of the craft they chose. Supes doesn’t have to drop everything to go save her and vice versa. Under no circumstances they will leave their mission unattended. They have each other’s back and they have full confidence on the other, because they share the same convictions and hopes for a better future for this planet.
Lois only cares for the future of her career. She even forgot about the future of their son.
She is a mean, selfish character and Superman has to be downgraded to be with her.
The list of reasons why the pairing of Clark and Lois don’t work is endless as is the list of reasons Kal and Diana, the Power Couple, should be together.
Only DC don’t want to see it.
In...support? Of Bendis.
Lork fans and red granny pants Superman lovers are loosing their shit over Bendis work on the Man of Steel.
And I find it marvelous!
“He’s destroying Superman!” “He’s undoing the great work Tomasi made since the start of Rebirth!” Etc.
Tomasi’s take on Supes was also crap, a return to 90s Superman, which, by the way, is 25 to 30 years old. But it was a crap which could last forever: that mediocre, vanilla, family guy Superman could’ve been the Superman for the ages.
Bendis crap is unsustainable.
The changes he made, the directions he took will fall apart under their own weight rather sooner than later, and that is a good thing.
Traditional Superman fans and Lork enthusiast needed a good old shaking of the bee hive to wake up from their complacence: the Superman they support is old, outdated, doesn’t belong in the Internet era, it’s a blast from the past.
What Bendis is doing will, inevitably, end in a reboot. It depends on DC Comics if they’ll seize the opportunity or will continue making the same mistakes over and over. Maybe they are going to try something new, like New 52, but, this time, committed to the idea, not leaving things half way again. They have, now, an example of what to do and what not.
We can only trust they’ve learnt from their past mistakes, even though we know they probably didn’t.
I don’t like Bendis, never had, never will. But, for now, he’s a useful idiot. Other thing he’s done right is he’s screwing DC with his iron clad contract, which let him do pretty much whatever he wants. No more DC screwing creators, stealing their intellectual property, like they did with Siegel and Shuster, among many others, like Bill Finger. Too bad he’s an inept author: in good hands, such power would be awesome.
The bad news is when all is started again, we’ll have to shoot Bendis: his contract established he can’t be fired, so we’ll have to end his tenure “in extremis”.
Is Batman Secretly Ruining DC Comics?
Secretly? Why secretly? Batso is openly ruining every other franchise inside DC! And, by extension, the whole DCU.
Batso is to DCU what Lois Lane is to Superman: they are so omnipresent, they eclipse the things that should be important and make everything about themselves.
Even though I’m not completely okay with everything said here, I can’t agree more when the host says it was, mostly, lack of vision and planning what killed the New 52. DC heads lead a chaotic mess.
There was another untold reason, which was the legal issues DC comics was facing in 2011 about the rights of certain characters. Miraculously, they were solved by 2016, when they drop the axe on N52 for good.
Ya think?
“People are more interested in buying the stories from 30 or 40 years ago than the contemporary stories, and that’s a failure on us.”
Dan DiDio