my favorite seven warriors 🔥🌊✨
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from Venezuela

seen from Malaysia

seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
my favorite seven warriors 🔥🌊✨
Enabling sustained minority rule at the national level is not a feature of our constitutional design, but a perversion of it.
“A representative democracy, where the right of election is well secured and regulated & the exercise of the legislative, executive and judiciary authorities, is vested in select persons, chosen really and not nominally by the people, will in my opinion be most likely to be happy, regular and durable.” --ALEXANDER HAMILTON, in a letter to New Jersey Governor Morris, 1777
This article* by George Thomas, a professor at Claremont McKenna College, provides a rebuttal to the MAGA Republicans who claim that the U.S. "is a republic, not a democracy," as if the two were mutually exclusive, and as if that were an excuse for minority party rule and/or the establishment of an autocracy. Below are some excerpts:
Dependent on a minority of the population to hold national power, Republicans such as Senator Mike Lee of Utah have taken to reminding the public that “we’re not a democracy.” It is quaint that so many Republicans, embracing a president* who routinely tramples constitutional norms, have suddenly found their voice in pointing out that, formally, the country is a republic. There is some truth to this insistence. But it is mostly disingenuous. The Constitution was meant to foster a complex form of majority rule, not enable minority rule. The founding generation was deeply skeptical of what it called “pure” democracy and defended the American experiment as “wholly republican.” To take this as a rejection of democracy misses how the idea of government by the people, including both a democracy and a republic, was understood when the Constitution was drafted and ratified. It misses, too, how we understand the idea of democracy today. When founding thinkers such as James Madison spoke of democracy, they were usually referring to direct democracy, what Madison frequently labeled “pure” democracy. Madison made the distinction between a republic and a direct democracy exquisitely clear in “Federalist No. 14”: “In a democracy, the people meet and exercise the government in person; in a republic, they assemble and administer it by their representatives and agents. A democracy, consequently, will be confined to a small spot. A republic may be extended over a large region.” Both a democracy and a republic were 'popular' forms of government: Each drew its legitimacy from the people and depended on rule by the people. The crucial difference was that a republic relied on representation, while in a “pure” democracy, the people represented themselves. [color/ emphasis added]
I strongly encourage people to read the entire article. The link above is from the Internet Archive and is accessible to all.
______________ *Note that this article was written in November 2020, when Trump was still president.
Based Thomas
I wonder Sherman thought of Thomas at this point because hearing what he was like during the Civil War made me think he was sweet guy.
these two are actually my favorite
A Case Of You (Joni Mitchell cover) by James Blake x BBC Radio 1's Zane Lowe Show as featured on the EP Enough Thunder - Director: Seb Edwards
Alright, the next historical figure with a Christams hat is, at the request of @dartharaiz, the Rock of Chickamauga! (AKA General George Henry Thomas)
>>>
General George Henry Thomas, oil on canvas