headcanon: “that would be enough” is when alexander actually falls in love with eliza
In a Winter’s Ball, it’s pretty clear that Alexander’s motivation for marrying a Schuyler is utilitarian.
If you can marry a sister, you’re rich, son.
Is it a matter of if, Burr, or which one?
Also, just LOOK at that face. :P
I think it’s understandable, the way he goes about finding his wife.
I mean, it’s pretty sad, considering Angelica takes her attraction towards Alexander seriously [this is not a game]
and Eliza [I do I do I do I do!] is just so genuinely, earnestly in love with her husband.
But from the beginning of the play, it’s clear that Alexander believes that he has to fend for himself and everything that he wants. And so he does with blood in his mouth and the skin of his teeth. He’s utilitarian with pretty much everything--his time, his effort, his life, his self. Everything for the cause of America and leaving a name. To an extent, I think he believes everyone acts the same way.
Angelica does, though we hear her wish sometimes that she doesn’t. Her first question, after composing herself from the whirlwind shock of meeting Alexander, is where’s your family from? Her instinct is to size people up and take the best course of action with regard to her family name.
I’m a girl in a world in which
My only job is to marry rich
My father has no sons so I’m the one
Who has to social climb for one
(sidenote: my heart aches when I hear that the first and primary reason she takes this upon herself is because I’m the oldest)
He’s after me ‘cuz I’m a Schuyler sister
That elevates his status, I’d
have to be naive to set that aside
He seems to believe she does. After securing permission from her father to marry her, his first words are about everything he can’t/can offer her:
Eliza, I don’t have a dollar to my name
An acre of land, a troop to command,
A couple of college credits and my top-notch
It’s clear from his wording, though, that he believes that last thing would be sufficient to secure the rest. He’s marrying her with the knowledge of the wealth she’s bringing, his status as Washington’s second-in-command, and the expectation that his actions during the war will bring him prestige.
At the beginning of That Would Be Enough, look how ashamed he is. He can barely meet her eyes.
He’s just been proven wrong. By being sent home in disgrace, he’s pretty much lost his honor and any chance of future promotion.
Would you relish being a poor man’s wife, unable to provide for your life?
I relish being your wife.
The fact that he’s enough doesn’t sink in, even as she promises it over and over. Not until she takes his hand and says that she knows who she married does he even glance up. There’s an implication there, I think, that he believes she married him because of his potential, and not as he is.
If he’d married Angelica, that would’ve been true--not because she’s shallower (Angelica outright says that knowing he’s penniless doesn’t affect how much she wants him), but because that’s how she believes she must act and move in the world. An Angelica that married Alexander probably wouldn’t have been less loving, but would have definitely been more conscious of their status, as she’d have probably seen her marriage as taking a chance on someone who had aptitude and potentiality but little to no security. In Eliza’s place, this would’ve been a blow for her.
Eliza just doesn’t care. On the bench in the garden, she cuts right to the heart of the matter: So long as you come home at the end of the day--that would be enough.
Watch how low-key flabbergasted he is when she says that. A legacy and money had been his primary goals in life.
We could chalk it up to naivete, of course, considering that she was born privileged and rich. She’s been married to Alexander for months, though, in a war where her side was losing and in dire need of resources. Even before that, she wasn’t tucked away in a mansion--she was just as enthusiastic as Angelica about going downtown and slumming it with the poor in “The Schuyler Sisters”. She’d have been seeing everything through, again, a very privileged lens, but the emphasis here is that she wasn’t sheltered, or at least only as sheltered to the same extent as Angelica was.
I’d err on the side that she knew exactly what she was getting into--even the part that Alexander didn’t love her to the same extent that she loved him. Why else would she ask him to let her inside his heart, if she knew that she wasn’t already there? Why else would her voice break, just a little, at the hope that maybe she, and they, could be enough for him?
Oh, let me be a part of the narrative!
In the story they will write someday
Let this moment be the first chapter
That’s all Eliza wants: Not anything that Alexander promised her, but Alexander himself. This is the face of a man beginning to realize that.
(Bonus: The little swirling melody after where you decide to stay is when I believe he genuinely falls in love with her.)
We know how their story goes, of course. It takes years for Alexander to shake off temptation, to truly recognize how she is, in fact, the best of wives and best of women, and to understand that the best version of him is and will always be in the garden, Alexander by Eliza’s side, her taking his hand. I’m glad he eventually does.