#hemospectrum discussion

[violetbard]

geminidoomed replied to your post: so vwhen people defend, as some call them,...

they u2ually mean cullable mutatiion2, although 2ometiime2 exploiited mutatiion2 are iincluded

vwhat is the difference betvween cullable and exploited mutations?

[violetbard]

redthreshecutioner replied to your post: so vwhen people defend, as some call them,...

WELL YEAH ANY WEIRD ANOMALY IS A MUTATION. EXTRA FEATURES, LACK OF FEATURES, WINGS, OFF COLOR BLOOD, SHIT LIKE THAT IS STILL MUTANT.

yeah, i figured! 

if you dont mind me asking, red, do you think that people tend to put other bloods vwith termed mutations on the back burner for those of candy red blood, since it’s generally talked about the most if not alvways? at least from vwhat ivwe seen.

[violetbard]

so vwhen people defend, as some call them, “mutants”, are they generally talking about evwery single troll effected by some kind of fault in their dna, from psionics to vwinged trolls, along side those vvwho are considered odd vwithin their timeline? or is it more so a thing centered around candy reds?

im just vwery itchy about figuring that out because. honestly the latter is generally vwhat i see and im curious about the different perspectivwes of this.

[violetbard]

brinyovwerlord replied to your post: so vwhen people defend, as some call them,...

Vwhen I refer to mutants, I generally mean physical mutations, such as aberrant blood colors, vwings or tails in timelines vwhere they’re not standard, and things of that like. But that may be because my timeline doesn’t consider mental capabilities such as psions and the like to be mutants.

i see, i see.

interesting...

[violetbard]

this concludes my experimental example of: howv to dish out caste issues and opinions on dash vwithout screaming for 12 hours, folks.

speaking against the big bads nevwer vwork if vwe all speak ovwer each other; thats important to remember.

also im coining the name caste commentary because its easier to say.