Apr 11, 2018
seen from Philippines
seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Brazil
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Singapore
seen from Türkiye
seen from China
seen from China
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from United States
"We used predictive keyboards trained on all seven books to ghostwrite this spellbinding new Harry Potter chapter." http://botnik.org/content/harry-potter.html
Harry Potter and That One Time Hermione Learns a Shrinking Spell and Ron Puts a Saddle On a Worm
you harry potthead fucks are so desperate for content, i feel like i could write “Harry Potter and that one time hermione learns a shrinking spell and ron puts a saddle on a worm” and you’d chug that shit up like a warm butterbeer on a cold day.
The Pottermore Patronus quiz sounds fun and I am looking forward to it, but it's just not going to be accurate. There are millions upon millions of different animals in the world. There's no way J.K. Rowling, even with a large team of people helping her, can create an acurate test with a satisfiable number of patronuses (patroni?). What if someone's patronus is a fennec fox? Or a coati? Or a dhole? Or a bilbi? Or a west indonesian pangolin? Will that person be able to get satisfying test results? No. There are only going to be a few potential options.