Human Clones - Bill Cooper (Full Broadcast Below)
Stem Cell Research & Cloning - Bill Cooper Broadcast #1906 (9-Aug-01)

seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Venezuela

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Macao SAR China
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United States
Human Clones - Bill Cooper (Full Broadcast Below)
Stem Cell Research & Cloning - Bill Cooper Broadcast #1906 (9-Aug-01)
Scientists worldwide are raising the inevitable ethical question- can this technique be allowed to clone humans as well? since primates are the “closest relative” of humans. Cloning has remained a debatable topic in medical and scientific research since its impact on human life can have enormous implications and it carries multitude of ethical, moral and legal dilemmas.
In a breakthrough study, first primates have been successfully cloned using the same technique used to clone the first mammal Dolly the shee
Upcoming Movie: Seobok A former intelligence agent gets involved with the first human clone, Seo Bok, who others seek, causing trouble.
I made a thing because I’m tired of certain tropes
I just think that so long as there are SO MANY groups of people who can easily convince themselves that other groups of people don’t have souls no one has any business fucking around with human cloning or tryna make sentient robots
Right, couldn’t sleep last night and a crazy idea popped into my head about cloning peoples.
If you’re using a DNA strand to clone the peoples then it’d actually be really easy to tell your clone apart from you. Because, yeah, your clone will look EXACTLY like you but!
It’ll only look like you biologically so it’ll have your bone structure, and your height, and your hair colour, etc etc. BUT!
It will not have your scars, or your tattoos, or even your dyed hair colour because those were down by environmental influences and nothing to do with your biological makeup,
🅰🅽🅳 🆃🅷🅰🆃'🆂 🅷🅾🆆 🅸'🅼 🅶🅾🅸🅽🅶 🆃🅾 🆂🆄🆁🆅🅸🆅🅴 🆆🅷🅴🅽 🆃🅷🅴 🅲🅻🅾🅽🅴🆂 🅲🅾🅼🅴
so i know there was some kind of agreement among scientists saying though they COULD clone humans, they won't. but, how does that work? couldn't someone just do it anyway?
It could happen.
I’m not familiar with an agreement among scientists not to clone humans, but there are reasons not to. Scientists do clone human tissue (therapeutic cloning), but probably no one has succeeded in reproductive human cloning--ie, making a human baby with 100% a donor’s DNA, or somatic-cell nuclear transfer.
(Reader poll: Do I still have to mention Raelians when I talk about human cloning? Or can we all just assume that they lied when they said they had successfully cloned a person and now we can all forget about it?)
Wikipedia has a list of laws about human cloning, although the US section needs to be updated. Here’s a good article called What Ever Happened to Cloning? published in August 2016.
Humans and primates are very difficult to clone and there doesn’t seem to be a market incentive to do it. Furthermore, there would be some public backlash to overcome. Some criticisms of human reproductive cloning are practical (the cost, difficulty, and high chances that something could go wrong) and some are more philosophical (playing God) and some are plain science fiction (“we might accidentally start harvesting clones for organs.”)
Cryogenics: the talk of the day on MSM... I wonder why. Cryogenics leads to human cloning, REM driven cloning, consciousness transfer, the "soul-tone...
Charlie Tetebo - Cryogenics: the talk of the day on MSM... I wonder why. Cryogenics leads to human cloning, REM driven cloning, consciousness transfer, the "soul-tone microchip" (microchip which can record a FLAWED copy of an entire person's consciousness) and re-animated clones (genetic copies of humans who once lived on earth and died, but are later revived through preservation of their DNA / Cells and through cloning technology). Noteworthy points from the video: "How ethical is cryogenics?" >> Sigh... How ethical is human cloning? "Revived" >>> re-animated human clones are "revived" through cloning technology. "Coming back from the dead" -there are plenty of individuals currently walking the earth, revived through cloning technology and referred to as "re-animated clones" They're hinting at human cloning, without actually saying "human cloning" -they are also placating the masses at the same time with misinformation which is despicable. Woman says she hopes she will come back in a younger frame of mind... How? Well it is possible to record a FLAWED recording of an entire person's consciousness (named: "Soul-stone microchip) before death, and insert this microchip into the brain of a human clone. HOWEVER, it is a FLAWED copy, and it is dead end technology, you will NOT be the same person, as you were as a natural born human. Woman says 'Hopefully, they will be able to replenish the body, and hopefully I will come back in a younger body of 25 years...' How? THROUGH human replication and duplication cloning technologies... "We're not there yet" --- OH but we are, and many of these technologies exist underground, removed from the imaginations of the public, however, many whistle-blowers have demonstrated that highly advanced technologies do in fact exist at present. Many animals have been revived through preservation and cloning technologies, this is public knowledge. We do have AI (artificial intelligence) supersedes human intelligence. Simply research "D-wave quantum computing" and you will be met with an AI which has the processing power of 7 billion human brains equivalent; such information is public knowledge. If this technique was absolutely guaranteed, then why stop there, why not making human cloning, and reanimated clones a public endeavour? They are placating the public with information like this and slowly tip-toeing us into such a public nightmare, which by the way is already prevalent but only public disapproval prevents them from coming forward and mentioning the extent of human cloning technology. "The future of humanity" - we can talk about the "present state of humanity" because such technologies already exist and are being used against the populace unsuspectingly, by a clandestine group of individuals referring to themselves as "The Illuminati" In the long run technologies such as cryogenics ends with human cloning, consciousness download / uploading, the "soul-stone microchip", re-animated human clones etc. We are consciousness after all, and therefore, when the time comes for our consciousness to leave this plane of existence, it is a much better option to LEAVE this plane of existence, than continuing to re-live life after the death of the natural born body, whereby we are re-animated as a flawed, and negative copy of ourselves, whether it is through cryogenics, cloning technology, downloading and uploading one's consciousness into human cloned bodies of ourselves. Dead is better. Furthermore, consciousness is infinite, and never dies, and therefore we shouldn't fear death of the natural born body. Donald Marshall #cryogenics #consciousness #humanclones #humancloning#reanimatedhumanclones #revive #endhumancloning #soulstonemicrochip#humanity #technology
https://www.facebook.com/charlie.legendd/videos/1892362154325382/