#human personality

[philosophybits]

When harm is done to a man, real evil enters into him; not merely pain and suffering, but the actual horror of evil. Just as men have the power of transmitting good to one another, so they have the power to transmit evil. One may transmit evil to a human being by flattering him or giving him comforts and pleasures; but most often men transmit evil to other men by doing them harm.

Simone Weil, "Human Personality"

[dreaminginthedeepsouth]

[crashinglybeautiful]

* * * *

A paragraph from Simone Weil’s most famous essay, "Human Personality":

At the bottom of the heart of every human being, from earliest infancy until the tomb, there is something that goes on indomitably expecting,  in the teeth of all experience of crimes committed, suffered,  and witnessed,   that good and not evil will be done to him. It is this above all that is sacred in every human  being.

[philosophybitmaps]

[sinterhinde]

Human Personality, Simone Weil, 1942-3

Simone Weil was born into an affluent life in Paris in 1909.  Very early, she demonstrated a strident, uncompromising compassion when she gave up sugar in solidarity with French soldiers in the First World War. While still a schoolgirl, she declared her solidarity with the communist left. Though uncompromising in her persona at school, she was also brilliant and had the best education France could offer in languages, classics and philosophy.  While at the École Normale Supérieure, her tutor set her focus on the problem of man as an active being.  To address this she took Plato as her master and Descartes as her antagonist.  These influences remained touchstones in her intellectual life.  Despite the spiritual writings for which she is best known, her training and approach was that of a philosopher. For the few years of her working life, she taught philosophy in secondary schools.  Weil’s compassion and strongly-held opinions led directly to a life of activism, which often scandalised the towns in which she taught.  Initially, her interests lay in the labour movement as well as pacifism.  Her judgment of the political weakness of the labour movement and more generally of social causes led to the qualification of her views on pacificism.  Violence, she then thought, could be a defense for human dignity against the Fascism that diminished it.  However, her exposure to the Spanish Civil War led her to contradict herself.  Force, she thought, could never be righteous.  Allowing that someone was the legitimate object of force inexorably nurtured tribalism, making murder seem natural.  Force controls those who would use it, an insight she saw in *The Iliad* which treated Greeks and Trojans alike as victims of force itself. Her views on force were a singular example of how her developed perspective was at odds with received pieties in Western Culture, both those of the establishment and those who opposed it.  She denied the importance of political rights; of justice by due process; of state or private ownership; private choice in life; and legitimation by collective, public will. Instead she elevated as primary response to affliction; the inestimable significance of a human being; the needs of the soul as the basis for government; meaningful labour; and good and evil. Weil was unafraid of intellectual isolation, nor did she seek fellows—though she did publish her essays in intellectual journals. She was not celebrated in her lifetime, though the force of her intellect was known. Many gave her a wide berth, because of her uncompromising manner, which was also evident in how she lived.  While working for the Free French in London on a manifesto for a transformed government in post-war France, her unyielding manner of living overcame her always-fragile health.  She died in Kent at 34.  Her celebrity came posthumously when her notes on Christian spirituality were published, influencing those within and without the Church.  Subsequently, her philosophical works have attracted a modest following among intellectuals and academics. (D. Levy)

I'm attaching the essay again here:

https://lib.tcu.edu/staff/bellinger/rel-viol/Weil.pdf

And, to be sure, Dr. David Levy's suggested and further readings, via The Integrity Project. The page also contains a short lecture from Levy, available as an mp3:

https://integrityproject.org/projects/portraits-of-integrity/simone-weil/

Levy has lectured on the Philosophy of Simone Weil at the University of Edinburgh and the course guide for 2017/18 can be found here.

Whilst the document is primarily intended for students, it provides a massive list of general and additional texts on or written by Weil - like, 8 pages worth. It also includes a list of prospective exam questions, which may be interesting to some.

https://www.ed.ac.uk/files/atoms/files/the_philosophy_of_simone_weil_course_guide_2017-18.pdf

Here is an online library that holds some of Weil's texts in their original French (among 1000s of other works):

http://classiques.uqac.ca/

Finally, a lovely long essay from academic, educator, and organiser Riley Valentine, An Impersonal Liberalism: Simone Weil and the Sacred, for Epoché Magazine.

An Impersonal Liberalism: Simone Weil and the Sacred

Simone Weil in her essay “Human Personality,” asks her audience to think about liberalism’s response to Nazi Germany through the “United Nat

[philosophybits]

Relations between the collectivity and the person should be arranged with the sole purpose of removing whatever is detrimental to the growth and mysterious germination of the impersonal element in the soul. This means, on the one hand, that for every person there should be enough room, enough freedom to plan the use of one's time, the opportunity to reach ever higher levels of attention, some solitude, some silence. At the same time the person needs warmth, lest it be driven by distress to submerge itself in the collective.

Simone Weil, "Human Personality"

[philosophybits]

Just as a vagrant accused of stealing a carrot from a field stands before a comfortably seated judge who keeps up an elegant flow of queries, comments and witticisms while the accused is unable to stammer a word, so truth stands before an intelligence which is concerned with the elegant manipulation of opinions. It is always language that formulates opinions, even when there are no words spoken. The natural faculty called intelligence is concerned with opinion and language.

Simone Weil, "Human Personality"

[philosophybits]

Every man who has once touched the level of the impersonal is charged with a responsibility towards all human beings; to safeguard, not their persons, but whatever frail potentialities are hidden within them for passing over to the impersonal.

Simone Weil, "Human Personality"