In the near future we'll only be able to communicate through devices. Actual human contact will be outlawed by the Apple iCourt.
Jim Carrey Quoted in Incarnate by Michael Frost
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Singapore
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from India

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from China

seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from China
In the near future we'll only be able to communicate through devices. Actual human contact will be outlawed by the Apple iCourt.
Jim Carrey Quoted in Incarnate by Michael Frost
Several potential jurors dismissed from Apple v #Samsung patent hearing over connections to either company
As the latest patent dispute between Apple and #Samsung kicked off in court today, the search for unbiased jury members to serve with Judge Koh began today resulting in a standing room-only environment in the court room with over 100 potential jurors summoned. While the process begins with a number of prospective jurors, the first day is […] http://j.mp/1kknGrq
Samsung SM-G7106 dual-sim smartphone leaked - Times of India
Samsung SM-G7106 dual-sim smartphone leaked - Times of India11/21/2013 Times of IndiaSamsung SM-G7106 dual-sim smartphone leakedTimes of IndiaNEW DELHI: Another &;upcoming&; Samsung smartphone is creating buzz online. The smartphone with model number SM-G710 has been leaked online, courtesy Chinese regulatory authority Tenaa. Samsung SM-G710, which appears to be a mid-range ...New Samsung midranger leaks out of China&;s TENAAGSMArena.comall 3 news articles »
Apple-Samsung Jury Finds the Sourdough Guilty - Wall Street Journal (blog)11/21/2013 Apple-Samsung Jury Finds the Sourdough GuiltyWall Street Journal (blog)Yes, hundreds of millions of dollars and the future of mobile phones are being debated. But can we please get rid of the sourdough bread on the sandwiches for lunch around here? That&;s what the so-called jury ruled Wednesday in San Jose:.and more »
Samsung and HTC phones go head-to-head in an &;uncheatable&; benchmark test - Engadget11/21/2013 Samsung and HTC phones go head-to-head in an &;uncheatable&; benchmark testEngadgetRemember the allegation that Samsung cheats at benchmarks? Despite the manufacturer&;s semi-denials, there&;s growing evidence to suggest that not only Samsung, but also a number of other Android phone makers engage in some level of chicanery.and more »
samsung s5620 monte price samsung galaxy tab samsung galaxy 5
Disaster for Samsung: Jury awards Apple $1.05 billion in patent case
#SuryaRay #Surya The jury in the “tech trial of the century” has ruled that Samsung has infringed on a number of Apple’ core patents, including one for “bounce back” technology. Worse for Samsung, the jury has also found that the infringement was intentional which likely led it to issue a $1.05 billion verdict against the Galaxy tablet alone. The jury also ordered Samsung to pay a series of additional damages for infringing other products and patents. Apple’s case is based on claims that Samsung “slavishly copied” its popular iPhone and iPad. The jury also found that the patents are not invalid — which would have protected Samsung. The news for Samsung went from bad to worse as the jury found that Apple did not owe any damages related to its alleged infringement of Samsung’s patents. The news came down after the jury unexpectedly announced that it had reached a verdict in the complicated intellectual property case. More soon. --- http://dlvr.it/238GTs @suryaray
A tale of two numbers: Apple won a major battle today in Steve Jobs' "thermonuclear war" against Android, which he (and Apple) considered a "stolen product." The verdict, coincidentally, came exactly one year after Tim Cook became CEO of Apple.
Samsung must now pay over $1 billion in damages after a jury decided it was infringing on a number of Apple's patents. On the other hand, the jury found that Apple did not infringe on any of Samsung's patents, and awarded exactly $0 to Samsung.
Yet the $1 billion figure is almost irrelevant, even though it is the largest patent verdict in history. Samsung makes several billion dollars in profit each quarter, and Apple, the most valuable company in the world, surely does not need the money. Indeed, Steve Jobs said that he was willing to "spend every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong."
No, for Apple, this is about values, and its motivation rings clear in its statement:
At Apple, we value originality and innovation and pour our lives into making the best products on earth. We make these products to delight our customers, not for our competitors to flagrantly copy. We applaud the court for finding Samsung’s behavior willful and for sending a loud and clear message that stealing isn’t right.