Quick Borzoi before bed. I think I'm getting the hang of the individual parts of the Borzoi, but might need some work putting them together. What do you think? 🤔
seen from United States

seen from Ukraine
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Guatemala

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands
seen from China

seen from Bahrain
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Yemen
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
Quick Borzoi before bed. I think I'm getting the hang of the individual parts of the Borzoi, but might need some work putting them together. What do you think? 🤔
/The answer brings an amused smirk, growing as the Senju continues./ So, you are saying I'm a bit difficult to reach, but the view is worth it when you do? More poetic than I expected. From you. But, I will take it. However, no I will not compare you to the sea as I have never seen it. It would be inaccurate to do so.
/Throughout this the Senju may as well have been chewing off his tongue with the strain of not spitting back some predictably venomous rebuttal, certainly his expression would lend credence to that much. All hackles, the makings of accusatory point are initialised. Yet as quickly as it manifests that indignation seems to be drained away./
… You’ve… never seen it? … I suppose borders as they were it wouldn’t-…
/He trails off, the point still hanging in place until he seems to catch himself./
Nonetheless. What, then, if not that.
THE ARKENSTONE, ONE OF THE SILMARILS; A SHORT ESSAY.
what we wanted was to say that even with all the wealth of erebor, thorin could not rest until he had the arkenstone. this one peerless jewel that, in thorin’s estimation, bestowed kingship upon its possessor. without it he was not whole. he had invested so much meaning in the arkenstone that without it he felt his identity and legitimacy were incomplete. in the end, as impressive and otherworldly as it was, the stone was just a material object, a bauble, a trinket. its power was attributed and not innate. though he does not understand it, thorin has given that power to the stone and trapped himself. weta’s the hobbit chronicles, PHILIPPA BOYENS’ COMMENTARY.
the story already had the ring and the gold, so another talisman may have been one too many, but the right to rule, it being the king’s jewel, is where the power of the arkenstone lay. [...] ultimately, the arkenstone was just a gem and the power of loyalty was beyond a talisman. weta’s the hobbit chronicles, RICHARD ARMITAGE’S COMMENTARY.
like the crystal of diamonds it appeared, and yet was more strong than adamant, so that no violence could mar it or break it within the kingdom of the arda. [...] and the inner fire of the silmarils fëanor made of the blended light of the trees of the valinor, which lives in them yet, though the trees have long withered and shine no more. therefore even in the darkness of the deepest treasury the silmarils of their own radiance shown like the stars of the varda; and yet, as they were indeed living things, they rejoined in light and received it and gave it back in hues more marvelous than before. [...] for fëanor began to love the silmarils with a greedy love, and grudged the sight of them to all save to his father and his seven sons [...] the silmarillion, OF THE SILMARILS AND THE UNREST OF THE NOLDOR.
but the jewel burned in the hand of maedhros in pain unbearable; and he perceived it to be as eönwë had said, and that his right thereto had become void, and that the oath was in vain. and being in anguish and despair he cast himself into a gaping chasm of fire, and so ended; and the silmaril that he bore was taken into the bosom of the earth. the silmarillion, OF THE VOYAGE OF EÄRENDIL.
THE GOLD-SICKNESS OF THORIN; A SHORT ESSAY.
seven rings [sauron] gave to the dwarves [...] the dwarves indeed proved tough and hard to tame; they ill endure the domination of others, and the thoughts of their hearts are hard to fathom, nor can they be turned to the shadows. they used their rings for only the getting of wealth; but wrath and an overmastering greed of gold were kindled in their hearts [...] the silmarillion, OF THE RINGS OF POWER AND THE THIRD AGE.
long hours in past days thorin had spent in the treasury, and the lust of it was heavy on him. though he had hunted chiefly for the arkenstone, yet he had an eye for many another wonderful thing that was lying there. the hobbit, CHAPTER FIFTEEN.
and already, so strong was the bewilderment of the treasure upon [thorin], he was pondering whether by help of dáin he might not recapture the arkenstone and withhold the share of the reward. the hobbit, CHAPTER SEVENTEEN.
while sauron could not tame to his will the dwarves, through his seven rings he kindled in the hearts of the bearers and their descendants a great desire for gold so long as they possessed their particular ring. such is the tragedy that befell particularly the ruling descendants of the line of durin who treasured their ring and wore it age upon age. the gold-sickness ran deep in thrór’s lineage. thrór did not take off his ring save to present it to his son, thráin, on the eve of the battle of azanulbizar (2799 of the third age), though the sickness and passing years had long-since robbed thrór of his ability to rule unhindered by his constant and greedy ruminations on gold and the acquiring of it, which had tinged the last decade of his reign upon erebor’s throne and waned the formerly present good-will of his dwarf heart. thráin had grown in the presence of the ring since birth, sharing in his father’s gold-sickness as it too mounted steadily within him. the ring was taken from thráin on the battlefield by azog the defiler, and thus the last and mightiest of the dwarf rings was held once more by sauron. remnants of the magical madness, kindled yet dormant, remained in thorin¹.
THE NEAR-SIGHTEDNESS OF THORIN; A SHORT ESSAY.
“ how far do you think it is? ” asked thorin, for by now they knew bilbo had the sharpest eyes among them. “ not at all far. i shouldn’t think about twelve yards, ” said bilbo. “ twelve yards! ” exclaimed thorin. “ i should have thought it was thirty at least, but my eyes don’t see as they used a hundred years ago. ” the hobbit, CHAPTER EIGHT.
dwarves, with their preference in remaining underground in the dim and dark¹ of their mountains where in such places little light oft reaches the eye, are more near-sighted than any other race in middle-earth. whereas elves can look across great distances, dwarves can see very fine details not caught by others when anything is brought close (a trait that lends itself to the unmatched workmanship that they are able to achieve with their craft). the near-sightedness of dwarves does not hinder them much², and while it becomes less and less easy to see far away unaided with age, they are otherwise unaware or indifferent to any difficulties. their architecture and ornamentation, comprised of straight lines, large, prominent statues, stamped patterns, deeply embedded runes, and embossed beads are aspects that reflect this lacking in their sight and ensure that the dwarves do not need faraway sight to be able to see these designs and journey through their realm (though tapestries have a large part in depictions of family history and lineage, flat decorations are rarely seen, if made at all, and many such sorts may emit a glow), nor would they need eyesight itself to be able to relate to their adornments that are as physically interactive (able to be perceived through contact) (i.e. the rune-stone received by kíli from dís is meant to be felt as much as looked at) as they are and can be visually³.
* interpretation and thoughts on spiderman: far from home.
content: just general thoughts particularly regarding maria hill, and of course, nick fury’s interpretation throughout the film. additionally, how i’m deciding to portray maria hill from this film is also put forward to be discussed.
warning: spiderman: far from home spoilers, sffh spoilers, mcu spoilers. child soldier, child abuse (mention).
thoughts.
001. cobie smulders and samuel l. jackson? badasses. there are some of fury’s dialogues there that i kinda didn’t like? particularly when he asked peter to kind of choose between being a kid and an avenger, when peter clearly stated again and again that yes, he wanted to be a kid for now thanks, and fury’s like???? making it seem as if peter’s torn between the choices. he wasn’t. again, peter clearly stated times and times again he wanted to rest. so i didn’t know what was up with that.
002. fury arranging the whole trip to accommodate so peter’s identity won’t be discovered though? amazing. that’s exactly the kind of shit SHIELD would pull, and yet, like....... at the same time they’re also consistently telling me that they’re understaffed? hmmm. i smell Bullshit(tm)
003. so yeah, kind of back to point 001, i feel kind of baffled that maria wasn’t saying anything in regards to the whole fury wanting to make peter a child soldier thing. i feel like...? there should be proper protocol for this? so like, of course, i didn’t expect mcu to fully fleshed-out maria as a victim of physical abuse to go against fury. but mmmm okay, several points:
(1) they started out maria’s role from the beginning to always somehow be a contradictory voice against fury. whereas fury say one thing, maria always have another thing to say to either shut fury down or make him re-think. they never were supposed to just have a simple employer-subordinate relationship. maria was never just this obedient character. that’s what makes their dynamic interesting, and why it worked for so long.
maria makes a point several times to question fury’s moves, in return, fury is always kept on his toes. they trusted each other when it mattered, of course they do, but that doesn’t mean their work-relationship was pleasant. you can actually several examples of this behaviour when maria would voice against fury in avengers (2012), and the most recent one in captain america: the winter soldier (2016). so, rounding up, i don’t understand why maria suddenly adopted this passive role and didn’t say anything when fury kept insisting that spiderman would be involved.
(1.5) people do understand they’re trying to ask peter to be a child soldier right ? all this time, peter’s been, what, SAYING IT AGAIN AND AGAIN THAT HE WANTED A BREAK?
(2) okay, sure, i get, in fury’s defence, i do understand that they’re dealing with a very powerful force and a lot of lives, once again, could be at stake. i would’ve understood fury’s complete need to want spiderman involved since the other avengers weren’t accessible or whatever, fine. but i just felt the argument fury used was ....... really not fury-ish? like, he could’ve bullied peter into being a spiderman in so many other ways, ( i.e. changing the schedules of the school trip for example ) but him saying all those bullshit that peter “needed to be what tony stark expected him to be” or “be a kid, or a be an avenger” or whatever was like....... the fuck? idk maybe i just generally disagree with the message that it carried, but i also feel like, fury is manipulative as a spy agent. but not that sort of manipulative.
(3) ‘cause again, okay, i feel like there should be protocols? like, of course enhanced individuals and children needed to be kept watched and under-wrap and all that. i can see SHIELD having had that sort of situations before where they were dealt with kids with special abilities before, and i feel: as much as they would want to monitor and understand the growth of said abilities or maybe even need to utilise it from time to time, they’re still ..... children, you know? they have like, uh,,,,, this thing we called “rights”? human rights? like, wanting an education etc. so yeah, like, my argument right now is that: fury and maria as a combination could’ve handled the matter of wanting peter involved more discreetly—
( i don’t mind fury’s abruptness and straight-forward nature. i feel like the time when he mentioned peter almost killing his classmates was so on-point and a great contrast to how the rest of the avengers, particularly tony, had handled him before. tony saw a kid. fury saw a soldier, one he needed to fight, and one who had made a mistake fury needed to ensure that wouldn’t repeat. i feel like the approach was accurate and it should give peter a whiplash that this was how militant-based reality worked. )
—or, i suppose, more delicately? i like the idea that they’re cornering peter to manipulate him into somehow being spiderman regardless, but the argument for the confrontation on why peter should be spiderman was not entirely, in my opinion, in character for them.
004 that “you got me?” and “i got you” scene? FUCKING BRILLIANT.
MARIA HILL GOT HER BAZOOKA AND IM YELLING
005 ( end credit spoiler ) fury and hill ending up being skrulls? fuck that. but also............ that would explain a lot why fury and hill seemed sloppy throughout this film but also ngghhhhhhhhhhh WHY CAN’T THEY GIVE MY GIRL A PROPER SCREENTIME but yeah im saying it right now: fury and hill looked a tiny bit tactless and less like the sharp agents they were and it showed.
interpretations.
001. my interpretation can go both ways: i can accept maria hill being present fully as maria hill during the entirety of sffh or she can be elsewhere while soren was masquerading as her.
002. for maria being maria in sffh. so yes, if it were truly maria and fury. first of all, their first step would’ve been to somehow make sure that quentin beck is a legit person first and foremost. i’m sure beck would’ve erased all of his identity as well as with his team’s etc before fury has even cornered him, but i feel like, maria and fury’s investigations would’ve been thorough regardless. maria isn’t trusting of beck, but the threats are present, so for now, like how she’d handled the avengers the first time around, she would have no choice but to trust beck. she doesn’t approve of parker’s involvement as well ( maria doesn’t like children working under her; she fought for her country to make sure, after all, that kids don’t have to. ) but in the end, she doesn’t have any concrete arguments on why peter’s help isn’t needed. regardless, she would ask that peter doesn’t have to be involved so much.
003. for maria not being in sffh. maria gave her consent to the skrull, at fury’s request, to masquerade as her. meanwhile, she’s handling her own military organisation ( the same one she’s lend talos and soren to use, with dimitri as the overseer of their team under their usage ) and went underground and underwent radio-silence when the attacks were happening ( which was why she didn’t mind soren being out in the open. ) due to a few on-going cases. maria is currently in contact with most of the present avengers save for maybe carol danvers, thor and dr. strange. when fury’s confirmed that soren and talos have completed their mission, she resurfaces about a week later, resuming her businesses and handling above-world. and yes, she does handle peter’s identity being uncovered.
The time and the place matters not.
"Remember that age is only a number in the end, victory is forever!"
"Die well."