unsub: i am a horrible person
jj: but you’re trying, right?
reid: yeah you’re probably trying
unsub, sweating: not really

seen from Netherlands
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from China
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from United States
unsub: i am a horrible person
jj: but you’re trying, right?
reid: yeah you’re probably trying
unsub, sweating: not really
Former FBI agent Joe Navarro breaks down interrogation techniques.
What Does Limiting Wrongful Convictions Look Like?
All in all, this case truly symbolizes the stark injustices people of colour experience within media coverage and the criminal justice system, and how positive action needs to be done to create an impartial and just system. Four ways we can limit the number of wrongful convictions, in this case are, introducing better interrogation techniques for youth, eliminating the use of police coercion, ensuring police departments don’t engage in selective evidence use, and ensuring the media lacks bias based on racism. Everyone who plays a role in the legal system should obtain greater knowledge in the interrogation processes for youth, to better these techniques. Since youth have a greater likelihood of being vulnerable and submissive to coercion and false confessions. This is due to their predisposition to act in a self-incriminating manner. Ultimately, creating wrongful convictions and consequences towards youth. This is relevant in the Central Park Five Case since the police should’ve been educated enough to know that the boys shouldn’t have been interviewed without receiving legal help first. Due to their lack of knowledge to request aid, and their inclination to depend on concrete reasoning. As well as, the factor that their interview should not have been so long in length. Since this increases the likelihood of them creating a false confession to escape the intolerable environment. Secondly, wrongful convictions like this case can be avoided by eliminating the use of police coercion. By doing this, subjects will be unlikely to create a false confession solely for the reason of getting a more lenient sentence or inaccurately admitting to something they didn’t do. Due to the interrogator leading them there. Thirdly, eliminating the use of selective evidence. If the New York Police hadn’t have acted unethically in choosing certain evidence, these teenagers would have never been persecuted. Since there was no evidence to prove their participation in the crime. Lastly, the media (specifically newspapers) should be responsible for eliminating biases since they play a crucial role in establishing the public’s perception of the case. Furthermore, causing greater amounts of racial segregation to grow as a result of the wrongful misconception of the men. By educating and eliminating these aspects in the legal system, we can be one step closer to achieving a more just system and decreasing the number of wrongful convictions.
Challenge #04905-M156: Caught Broadside
Torture is forbidden in the Alliance, but there are more ways to break a person than physical pain. Ever deal with a dad who seems to want to turn everything into a bad pun? -- Anon Guest
[AN: The Alliance has transcended the need for torture. There are better ways to get information out of someone. Therefore, this has to happen somewhere on the Edge]
The Galactic Alliance is an agreement between multiple polities and species in an extended trade network. People talk their problems out and attempt to resolve issues with negotiation and deliberation. Those who insist on egregiously flaunting the Alliance law get the heavier hand of Pax Humanis, and very few others.
Yes, there are Space Marines. Most of what they do is defence oriented. There are occasional calls to police a Deregger planet in need of severe intervention. There are also missions to seek out, capture, and contain space pirates and disassembling their operations.
That is where Edge Territory Interrogation Techniques come in.
[Check the source for the rest of the story]
Building Profiles
Criminal profiling begins at the crime scene and in the interrogation room.
These moments reveal behaviour under pressure and provide critical insight into deception, motive, and personality or conflict of values. Usually, an interrogator, most often a detective or trained investigator, conducts the confrontation, while criminal profilers and behavioural analysts observe.
Setup of the Interrogation Room The environment is deliberately chosen based on what is known about the suspect. Sometimes the room is designed to make the suspect comfortable, encouraging openness and cooperation. Other times, a more intimidating environment is used to elicit stress responses. Observers capture subtle cues in behaviour, emotional shifts, and reactions, giving critical insight for profiling. Modern interrogations often use cameras instead of two-way mirrors, which prevents distractions and allows suspects to forget they are being observed, preserving authentic reactions.
The Reid Technique Developed in 1947 by John E. Reid and formalized in the 1950s, the Reid Technique is one of the most widely used interrogation methods, particularly in the United States. Its structured framework moves a suspect from denial toward admission while generating extensive behavioural data valuable for criminal profiling.
The technique relies on identifying behavioural and psychological stress, often referred to as hot spots: inconsistencies, emotional shifts, defensive reactions, or changes in speech, posture, and facial expression when sensitive topics arise. Criminal profilers observe these moments as indicators of pressure points, value conflicts, and motive.
The Reid Technique relies on nine steps, designed to gradually move a suspect from denial toward admission while revealing behavioural cues useful for profiling:
Positive Confrontation: The interrogator confidently states that the evidence indicates the suspect’s involvement.
Theme Development: Moral, emotional, or situational explanations are presented to make it easier for the suspect to rationalize the truth.
Handling Denials: Early denials are interrupted or discouraged to prevent the suspect from reinforcing a false narrative.
Overcoming Objections: Objections are reframed as reasons why the suspect may have committed the crime.
Procurement and Retention of Attention: The suspect’s focus is maintained through psychological and physical engagement.
Handling Passive Mood: Once resistance weakens, the interrogator gently guides the suspect toward admitting involvement.
Presenting an Alternative Question: The suspect is offered two options, both implying guilt but framed to encourage confession.
Developing the Details of the Admission: The suspect provides specific details about their involvement.
Converting the Admission to a Confession: The verbal admission is documented, recorded, or formalized in writing.
Profiler Observations During the Reid Technique: • Pressure points • Hot spots • Behavioural shifts under accusation • Value conflicts revealed during confrontation • Inconsistencies in narrative or detail • Attempts to control or redirect the narrative
Other Interrogation Techniques
PEACE Model: Rapport-based interview emphasizing preparation, engagement, open questioning, and evaluation. Observers assess baseline behaviour, emotional control, and cognitive effort.
Cognitive Interrogation: Helps suspects reconstruct events in detail. Inconsistencies and stress indicators highlight deception or rehearsed narratives.
Kinesic and Behavioural Analysis: Focuses on posture, gestures, facial expressions, eye movements, and speech patterns. Profilers compare these cues to baseline behaviour.
Strategic Use of Silence: Pauses create psychological pressure; how suspects fill gaps can reveal guilt, confidence, or fear of exposure.
Rapport-Based Interrogation: Highly trained interrogators build trust quickly, allowing natural responses, emotional cues, and moral reasoning to surface. Profilers observe both suspect and interrogator.
Theme Development and Narrative Framing: Presenting morally or emotionally justifiable narratives tests how suspects respond. Profilers observe rationalization, acceptance, rejection, or manipulation.
Baseline Comparison and Statement Analysis: Comparing neutral conversation to crime discussion shows shifts in language, tone, and detail, helping detect deception, distancing, or ownership of actions.
Manipulative Rapport and Strategic Disruption: Suspects may employ false rapport or intimate cues, such as feigned vulnerability or physical gestures, to influence an interrogator’s emotional alignment. Investigators counter this by introducing another officer or altering the interrogation dynamic, interrupting manipulative intimacy and restoring objective behavioural assessment.
Setting Motion in Profiling Observers watch both the suspect and the interrogator interaction, noting real-time reactions, emotional shifts, and any slips in values or conflict. Every verbal cue, pause, contradiction, and emotional reaction contributes to constructing a behavioural profile, anticipating future behaviour, and preparing evidence for the courtroom, including information relevant for the victim’s lawyer.
Later, the profiler may conduct an interview to clarify motives, gather context, or explore psychological patterns, while the interrogation remains led by the trained detective or investigator.
It's a pivot moment in the investigation, with skilled interrogators, behavioural analysts, and criminal profilers present, ensuring nothing is overlooked and creating a complete understanding of the crime and the criminal while guiding sentencing, parole decisions, and risk assessment.
Do police interrogation techniques produce false confessions?
“Russano and her colleagues used the model to test tactics associated with the Reid Technique. Direct accusations elicited confessions from innocent and guilty subjects alike, and minimization proved especially effective: when the experimenters told subjects, “You probably didn’t realize what a big deal this was,” the confession rate among guilty parties increased by about thirty-five per cent. Yet Russano observed “collateral damages”—the confession rate among innocents tripled. In subsequent experiments, she has found that other Reid tactics are extremely effective in producing confessions but not very good at separating true ones from false ones.”
Interrogation Techniques and False Confessions
Interrogations are a crucial part of any investigation process. An effective Interrogation can help the Investigating officer get a confession and gather more information from an eyewitness or an accomplice. Written By: Prashansa Tripathi - #forensics
Continue reading Interrogation Techniques and False Confessions
View On WordPress
RO/11/01/2017