seen from United States
seen from Israel
seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from Martinique
seen from Switzerland
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from Sri Lanka
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from Switzerland
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from Algeria
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
People don’t talk about Dinah and Taylor’s post-rescue dynamic enough
Mostly a slight experiment with paneling. Effect for Taylor’s bug sense inspired by @cazzysancerito’s Worm comic adaptation (check it out if you haven’t yet it’s really good!)
Yeah antagonize the villain that had pretty much wiped the floor with other heroes and villains surely this will go well surely beat down the villains who can tank alot of injuries surely this will go well, at least Ross knew how to deal with Hulk in different ways...
Worm fanfic writers love to say that the PRT should ignore public relations and focus solely on getting rid of villains, but when I, PRT ENE Director James Tagg...
Bro was so hard to draw cos I only had "suit, bushy brows black hair and lidded eyes" to go on so ENJOY
@victoriadallonfan
Apparently I forgot to post my Tagg design here before.
My mental image of him has him look/sound kinda like Andy Serkis (though I don’t think that really gets across in this drawing)
Worm AU where everything's the same except Alexandria is a muppet, and nobody notices her civilian ID is also a muppet except for Tagg.
Free Will Universe Model - James Tagg
Free Will Universe Model: Non-computability and its relationship to the ‘hardware’ of our Universe I saw his poster presentation at the TSC conference in Tucson and thought it was pretty impressive. I'm not qualified to comment on the math, but I don't see any obvious problems with his general approach: http://jamestagg.com/2014/04/26/free-will-universe-paper-text-pdf/ Some highlights:
Some Diophantine equations are easily solved automatically, for example: ∃𝑥, ∃𝑦 𝑥² = 𝑦² , 𝑥 & 𝑦 ∈ ℤ Any pair of integers will do, and a computer programmed to step through all the possible solutions will find one immediately at ‘1,1’. An analytical tool such as Mathematica, Mathcad or Maple would also immediately give symbolic solutions to this problem therefore these can be solved mechanically. But, Hilbert did not ask if ‘some’ equations could be solved, he asked if there was a general way to solve any Diophantine equation. ... Consequence In 1995 Andrew Wiles – who had been secretly working on Fermat’s ‘arbitrary equation’ since age eight – announced he had found a proof. We now had the answers to both of our questions: Fermat’s last theorem is provable (therefore obviously decidable) and no algorithm could have found this proof. This leads to a question; If no algorithm can have found the proof what thought process did Wiles use to answer the question: Put another way, Andrew Wiles can not be a computer.
Also, he is the inventor of the LCD touchscreen, so that gives him some credibility as well. http://www.trustedreviews.com/news/i-never-expected-them-to-take-off-says-inventor-of-the-touchscreen-display
