Group Reflection-Junyang Zhao
The final stage of out project is almost upon us and it is time to reflect on our work so far. I will do so using the stages of group development provided by Tuckman and Jensen because it is what our tutor believes to be true.
We went through our first stage “Forming” (Tuckman & Jensen, 1977) quickly and smoothly. We learnt each other’s name, discipline, place of origin, and a little of work style. The true nature of each of our preferences were not discovered at that moment, but we worked together pretty well since none of us had any obvious conflict with others.
The “Storming” and “Norming” (Tuckman & Jensen, 1977) stages were also fun for us. We had all gotten a firm hold of the project and we were all pitching valuable ideas to the group. Each of our work style begins to emerge at this stage, where some of us are really prepared, and others show up more casually; some of us are more creative, some are more resourceful, and some are more orderly. Our differences in style did not obstruct our creative process. Instead, the balance between practicality and creativity was well-controlled and we worked more efficiently each time we meet.
Whist working through the “Performing” (Tuckman & Jensen, 1977) stage, our group has reached a point where we know what each of us are going to provide and contribute to the group at every turn. We have developed a rhythm of working where we can all shine brightly with our ideas and styles without over-shadowing others.
Tuckman, B.W. & Jensen, A.C. (1977). Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited. Group & Organization Management, 2(4).










