seen from Netherlands
seen from Yemen
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Yemen
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Yemen

seen from Angola
Despite all claims to the contrary, a democratic system can cascade into it's own form of tolitarianism. One that could eclipse the most authoritarian or autocratic states. In those states, the rule is absolute, yet its apparent and understood. In a democracy, to paraphrase Sunic and Samuel Francis' "Anarcho-tyranny," it's more insidious. It takes on a form of it's own through the academic, media, political, business and bureaucratic institutions that borders on the psychotic. To quote Sorban, compared to King George III when he ruled the colonists, are we freer or have more "liberty?"
My ideology.
Ancient Toryblr meme
"Spann's authoritarian-corporate holistic doctrine of universalism (also known as Spannism) was based on an ontological metaphysics that Spann created by connecting various lines of thought from politics, social science and economics. In terms of the history of ideas, his universalism was essentially based on Plato's theory of ideas, medieval German mysticism, Hegel's idealism and the philosophy of romanticism. He published works from these schools of thought in his multi-volume anthology Die Herdflamme.
Spann saw the most important task of universalism in 'overcoming individualistic social and economic theory'. During his academic career, Spann wrote numerous socio-political writings, of which his work The True State of 1921 is considered the most important. The term spannism is also used for universalism. In it he developed a 'social model based on medieval guilds, structured by estates and characterized by hierarchy, which, instead of equal voting rights for the citizens, knew the election of a supreme leader by the leaders of the diverse, structured masses and associations.' According to Spann, the people were neither constituted by the state, nor by race or language, but only through a 'spiritual community'. Spann saw this in the Germans in their ethnic 'people' and their 'people’s property'. This universalistic-idealistic social doctrine was directed against rationalism, liberalism, materialism and Marxism and called for a reorganization of state and society on a professional basis (corporate state).
The universalist teachings of Spann did not describe the world as an atomistic structure in the sense of market theory, but as an organic structure in the sense of structure theory. Within this organic whole, in which 'each individual member could only be adequately defined in relation to the unit superior to it', the hierarchically structured social unit took precedence over the individual. Spann thought of the economic system in a tiered structure with the world economy at the top, which is further subdivided in descending order into national economies, regional economies, business associations, companies and individual economists."
...we human beings have two basic, and contradictory political impulses. We want to pull everyone together in an all-encompassing unity, and we also want our own people to be separate from everybody else. The most successful empires have been able to combine these two.
Charles A. Coulombe, “Should the Holy Roman Empire be re-established?”