#keeping these

[faggotsaint]

I just liberated a bunch of hoarded urls

my chudlings tho

[kipperdoodler]

for future me who is stupid ant

[hellbent-mizuki]

I think I'm more willing to talk about my thoughts on transids since I'm calmer and not so easy to set off. Ya also do genuinely seem to be more good faith than I thought. (Defensive person/alters)

I am very understanding of the term itself. I even identify as transage. I had responded to someone who asked about why radqueers ID with transids, and went into detail about our transage identity. This includes understanding trace and transabled dysphoria. (Can't link because I'm using anon to not link main to discourse acct - or, too much.)

My problems lie in a few of the microterms' usage, and folk being bigoted with it, which I feel is a common sentiment in anti rqs as a whole if they're anti or transid neu/crit.

Transableds tend to rely on some stereotypes. This is also a form of disorder faking, which has been heavily promoted in radqueer spaces, we've noticed. This does extend to transethnicity and trace folk. I still see these terms as valid on their own, but the management of is questionable at best and very ableist or racist at worst.

Trand(harmed/harmful) terms can promote harm. Matter of fact, there are transabuser folk who do look to maliciously abuse people without their victims being risk-aware, which should be important when it comes to conabuse (If you're getting into a dynamic, which I prefer calling conabuse relationships, it should, in some form, benefit both parties; as all dynamics, sexual or not, should in general if it's consensual). Also have some posts I made on this, and have one more I want to get through making.

Transbigoted terms... I can't understand those. I know people say it's because of folk wanting power, or it's OCD, however I feel these terms are, in fact, poorly managed to a strong severity. I would feel an alternative, pro-transid term would be better here, like psuedoID terms. This can also work for some transharmful terms (transcultleader, transprogrammer, etc.,). This comes from someone who was genuinely seconds from IDing as transarsonist on pure impulse or whim, to be fair, due to thoughts and pyromaniac urges spiking.

Aside these caveats, I feel we're rather accepting on the term. It's just the usage and community that's our concern. The three of us (alters) have already explained how we became more accepting of transid, as well, of course.

The reason we suggested a poll on why folk are anti radqueer is because of the fact that we're pro para and (maybe pro-leaning, thinking about it) transid critical, but so strongly anti-c that we don't, at all, agree with the ideology of radqueers on accepting anyone and everyone, even if they're pro-c, nonetheless hate the creator, who also made xenosatanism, as I'm sure you know.

Hope this kinda helps with some insight on us and our reblog better. /g

Mod Nectar from @nectar-rain (Dys, Diya, and Mads)

It does help ^^

[silvasomnia-blog]

MY GRANDMOTHER SENT OVER SOME SHOES AND I GOT THESE HIGH HEELS AND THEY'RE THE ONLY HIGH HEELS I LIKE BUT THEY CAN DO THE SATSUKI CLACK

YES