#lawsuit

[tortadvisorlaw]

Free Case Review https://tortadvisor.com/social-media-addiction-lawsuit-negligence-verdict-2026/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=tumblr Contact Us Now

[baetalk]

Todd and Julie Chrisley Sue Lawyer for Malpractice After Fraud Conviction

Todd and Julie Chrisley Sue Lawyer for Malpractice After Fraud Conviction The fallout from Todd and Julie Chrisley’s high-profile fraud conviction continues, as the reality TV couple has filed a lawsuit against their former lawyer, Chris Anulewicz, and the law firm Balch & Bingham. According to court documents obtained on June 9, the Chrisleys allege legal malpractice, claiming their attorney’s…

[weissmochi]

Okay. TPCi and its former Director of Engineering being sued because of voyeurism targeting transgender people was not on my bingo card. Holy crap this is actually vile.

[saywhat-politics]

.Trump sued Capital One to prove they closed his accounts over politics

[houseofbrat]

I couldn't even make it ten minutes through this video once it became clear that neither of the two people talking have read the actual court filings they're pretending to discuss.

I dropped out at the eight-minute mark.

An actual UK lawyer is on the stream and couldn't be bothered to get a copy of the actual court documents to see what they said?

No one in the press has bothered to ask the court for a copy?

No one can take the time to see whether or not the claims in the suit are valid?

This is just ridiculous. That suit started months ago. But NO ONE knows what the specific claims are? Or if they're as valid as people like to purport they are?

[snacksafely]

Court Ruling Dismisses Anaphylaxis Product Liability Claim - SnackSafely.com

An Oklahoma federal court ruling underscores the high bar plaintiffs face when linking anaphylaxis to an allegedly defective consumer product.

[seriously-mike]

Court Rules Against Photographer Who Sued AI Dataset for Copyright Theft

It could have big implications.

You know what's hysterically funny about this case?

It absolutely, utterly, totally demolishes the dumbest anti-AI arguments, the very same ones that Cory Doctorow already pointed out are full of shit.

Kneschke requested his photos be removed from the dataset but LAION denied holding copies of his photos saying it “only maintains a database containing links to image files that are publicly available on the internet”.

This is it, people. LAION just tracks publicly available images on the internet, which is even less than Pinterest does (as, need I remind you, Pinterest holds copies of other people's works without their knowledge, much less consent, to say nothing of link to the original version, credit or even, sometimes, the possibility of commenting where it came from), and I have yet to see any whiny Butlerian jihadi cunt complain about Pinterest "stealing people's work".

To compare: LAION makes a phonebook. Pinterest makes a deluxe, glossy paper coffee table book of full-page reproductions. This analogy won't be clearer.

In its decision, the court says that because LAION releases its dataset for free, it is considered non-commercial and for scientific research.

UP YOURS, FUCKFACE. Information wants to be free and all the Gettys of the world can't change this.

"Weak and contentious" like an absolute motherfuck.