If I had a nickel for every time a character played by Jack Quaid what’s compared to Canary, I’d have two nickels which isn’t a lot, but it’s kind of weird. It happened twice.
seen from Italy

seen from Singapore
seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China

seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from United Kingdom

seen from China
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
If I had a nickel for every time a character played by Jack Quaid what’s compared to Canary, I’d have two nickels which isn’t a lot, but it’s kind of weird. It happened twice.
Lately I've been thinking a lot about Bradward Boimler. But no, not like that, sorry.
It's just that he's set up as kind of a "Loser" archetype, especially in the beginning. A square, follows rules to the letter, has trouble being flexible, seeks validation through achievement. A Starfleet nerd, as Mariner puts in.
But here's the thing. Every time Boimler falls, he keeps getting up. When he fails, he's dissatisfied, yes, and he might even take time to be upset about it, but then BUT THEN he tries again.
Like, watching it happen, it's funny, right, this noodly skinny guy, failing time and again at things other people breeze through, often with a shrill shriek accompanying it. And it took me a while to see it, but once I did, I couldn't unsee it.
Hi I'm a former gifted kid and if I do not get it perfectly the first time, I consider it a shameful failure. Probably a familiar story on this webbed site. So watching Boims fail and then take that as a cue to just try again and again until he's satisfied with the result, not until he meets other people's criteria, it's... eye-opening, actually. Because make no mistake he's a perfectionist too, but it doesn't slow him down -- instead it's the driver behind his constant strive.
I just... wow? The resilience, the perseverance, the strength it must take to keep at it no matter what. Because that's what you want. And on the ~Fliiip~ side, that means that if something doesn't interest you anymore, you can just... stop. No harm no foul, maybe you learned something and maybe you didn't, but now you're moving on, and you don't consider that to be wasted time.
The way Boimler is set up, how is he not a blubbering mess on the floor? How is he not being destroyed by his own neurotic anxiety?
(Part of the answer, per the show, is the friends, because seeing William handling things, and how he reacts to seeing Mariner, it's just... oof. Not only is the Cerritos staffed by competent people, and he has to learn to put his trust in them, but his friends are actually his strength. Yes duh that's the main theme of the show but man it's hitting me in the meow meow)
Unlearning shame is such a complex journey but the thing about Bradward Boimler is there is no shame in learning.
It's one of those things you know as a child but you learn, time and again, to tamper it down. You asked something everybody knows. You tried and made a mistake. You embarrassed yourself or, even worse, you embarrassed someone else. You dared to exist as a flawed human. May the ground open up and swallow you!
The pain, the discomfort, becomes survival-level instinct. So you don't get beaten, or deprived, or whatever punishment you had to endure for being imperfect.
Real life isn't Starfleet. It's organic and messy and contradictory and yes, sometimes there will be losses and consequences to your failures and they might even be spectacular, but then what?
I think, maybe, that perhaps then I could stand up and say I can do better, hit me again.
It wasn't possible before, but it might be possible now. I'm in a safer place, with safer people. It's safe to fail.
You. Trekkie. Is lower decks any good?
I hear nothing but praise but the premise makes me hesitant
I haven't actually watched all that much of it. I'm pretty behind on the past few years of Trek in general. From what I have seen it's pretty good. It'll never be my fav (DS9 my beloved) but I like what I've seen.
Also it made my favorite Star Trek ship Canon in an alternate reality, so it's go my seal of approval!
Aight time to totally over analyze a cartoon again even though nobody cares.
Soooo I strongly believe that Ensign Flecher in lower decks suffered some sort of serious brain trauma when he fried his brain. I mean he had a Major personality shift and began acting irrationally immediately after, and just no one made him go to sick bay?? Mariner, Boimler, What the fuck? Like I know you were mad but take that bitch to the doctor his ass needs a scan
Sketchaday #trek
A quick sketch of some of the characters of animated series Star Trek: Lower Deck
#inktober
Is this the first confirmation that the Cardassian language is called Cardassi? I feel so validated.
The Stairs Under the Bridge
If you've been following my blog for a while, you know that one of the many mysteries/points of discussion that come up repeatedly is: what is happening in the space under La Sirena's bridge? There's a door leading there from the mess hall and we see Picard walk through it in S01E06, "The Impossible Box", but we never find out what that space is being used as.
(At least, we don't know what its in-universe use is. We know from set plans that in the studio, the space apparently held the playback setup.)
We got a glimpse of a cross-section of the ship in the Blu-ray set tour, which has some impossible geometry happening under the bridge...
(That is not a proper floor and something is definitely clipping through it!)
... and if you remember my post from a while back, I speculated that the most likely explanation is that the model has an extendable ladder there, that would allow people to board/leave the ship by a means other than the loading ramp. This would fit with the early idea of the season 1 writers to have Picard board La Sirena in a space port, rather than beam him on board while she's in orbit.
Well, a couple of weeks ago, we got confirmation that this is indeed what the production team originally intended.
Dave Blass, the production designer for PIC Seasons 2 and 3, tweetet some images showcasing a cross-section of the Sirena set/model:
As you can imagine, this gave me enormous joy (and a not too small amount of glee)! I have long insisted that the panorama windows, i.e. the exit the Motley Crew use to get off the ship once she crash-lands on Coppelius, don't really work as a proper access point to the ship. There is a three foot drop right inside the window the crew needs to bridge, no proper hatch, no ladders, etc. The only reason it makes for such a convenient exit is that Sirena is buried in a few metres of dirt, bringing the window level with the ground.
And indeed, La Sirena has, or at least was originally intended to have, a proper access to the front of the ship, one with a ladder and hatch and everything! And it's located in the mysterious space under the bridge!
But, me being me, this schematic also immediately raised a question: Isn't that ladder a bit too short?