Talk about childish. This boy wants to be the end-all-and-be-all and wants no connection to the people who have been doing for decades what he wants to do.
This was after he shamed Bob Jones III for dividing and coding alumni.
He blocks me.
So here's what happened.
Clifton Cauthorne said this:
So a BJU-loyalist expressed doubt that such a database existed. I offered this proof:
I explained that I was coded with "U" for unfriendly the last I heard. I explained that the woman assigned to evaluate my standing, Carolyn Forbes, had recently passed away. I explained that I was banned from campus. I explained that Stephen Jones claimed to want to remove the "coding" system, but he's actually the one that banned me.
You can see my ban letter here. You can see all the evidence I have on Infoman here -- including a handout explaining how it worked.
I was agreeing with Michael!
Then I see he's got a big reveal on Monday about writing a third-party complaint to SACSCOC.
Okay. Good luck with that, Mike. But okay. To that I offered my 300-page Third-Party complaint.
I honestly did not think he'd delete the comment since I was supporting him.
I was clearly wrong.
So in sum....
Michael Pettit, when he was casting aspersions on Bob Jones III for banning alumni, banned me himself for agreeing with him.
These BJU boys love to be the heroes of their own stories, and they do not like women who open their mouths.
So typical. So completely typical.