Q: Why Isnât There A Menâs History Month? Really??
March is Womenâs History Month, and some people insist on asking: Why isnât there a Menâs History Month? This is going to be a long month - there are 26 days left and Iâm sharing this to save some of us time. Â Â
30 second A: Because men as a class are not symbolically annihilated in our media.Womenâs History Month, like Black History Month, is a pragmatic, short-term response to persistent cultural marginalization and misrepresentation. Itâs an antidote to systemic erasure. Itâs an attempt to both create representation and explain why itâs important.
Image from: http://mrbelloblog.com/2014/02/15/student-resources/womens-history-month/
10-second answer is: We donât have a Menâs History Month because we donât need one. Every month is men's history month.Â
Despite womenâs recent gains, our stories are still produced mainly by men, about men, from menâs perspectives, and for men.
So, for example, in coverage of Syrian refugee camps and their destabilizing effects, sexual assault gets almost no coverage in mainstream media, this despite it being one of theprimary reasons identified by people fleeing their country. Or maybe, our immigration reformwhich, until the issue was forced, concerned itself mainly with finding ways to get highly skilled, educated people into the country instead of the more than 75% of immigrants who are women with children and far less likely to be educated in their home countries because of gender discrimination. Did you know that in a natural disaster, such as flooding, tsunamis, hurricanes, and earthquakes, girls and woman are 14 times more likely to die than boys and men? Iâd be willing to bet a whole lot of money that you didnât because what we allow the media to portray as âgender neutralâ information is anything but. There are thousands of these examples globally every day. Todayâs news is tomorrowâs history and todayâs history was written in exactly these ways. This media imbalance is unhelpful and discriminatory and continues to support an institutionally sexist and racist status quo.Â
Menâs voices, experiences and needs are still widely understood to be representative of humanity and women â our voices and experiences and needs, are not.  And, while it is clearly the case that in this country the history of white menâs deering-dos is the backdrop of our institutional lives, the exact same pattern of sexism replicates itself within the developing cultural memories of minority groups and in globally in countries where race does not inform peopleâs identity and societyâs structure the way it does in the United States. Last week I walked down the hall of a high school where the walls, in celebration of Black History Month, were plastered with flyers celebrating prominent African American men. It was, on that day, also the celebration of Audre Lorde and Toni Morrisonâs birthdays. That week was the week that Barbara Jordan was first elected to office. Not a flyer in sight.  The persistent denial of that fact that menâs history is not âour historyâ and that âmankindâ is not universal term for humanity continues to create everyday social harm.Â
But, but, butâŠâWomen didnât do anything in the past worth writing about.â
Women are and always have been plenty busy, engaged, and ambitious and, in the past, many managed to transcend the manifold obstacles to our success. We have, the world over, thousands of years worth of women philosophers, scientists, writers, critics,mathematicians and physicists, historians, technological innovators, labor agitators,politicians and rulers, soldiers, doctors, thinkers, political theorists, social justice leaders, andeducators. Even pirates.
For the most part women have done these things wearing more than our skivvies. Itâs just that our work, our lives, our problems, our accomplishments, have been ignored and continue to be excluded.
Women were prohibited from going to school. Barred from voting or running for office. Not allowed to own property. Were property. Sexually preyed upon in state sanctioned ways. Vulnerable to early death, especially through pregnancy and childbirth. Worked to the point of physical and mental exhaustion. Had the fruits of our labor stolen from us in acts of socially sanctioned sexism. Legally denied the right to patent our ideas and inventions.Systemically excluded from public life with malice. Subject to the rule of fathers, husbands, and sons with no recourse to the law. Threatened regularly with violence, as we still areevery day. And routinely censored and bullied simply for having the nerve to express opinions out loud.
But if thatâs not evidence enough, here are other places where women are discriminated against:
In childrenâs television and film programming
In Hollywood and the film industry
In television programming
In the creation of religious culture (not even wasting time on a link)
In Google Doodles (really)
Even in movie crowd scenes
Of course, the internet is filled with women making content every day and this is good, but the Internet by itself is not enough. While many people assume that new technology is automatically egalitarian and progressive, nothing could be further from the truth. Technology is informed by the people who build and control and populate it. So, for example, Wikipedia, an online reservoir for âhistoryâ that is increasingly used by people around the globe, is notoriously gender imbalanced. It is the perfect example of how deeply entrenched and complicated systemic bias isâwhatever the medium.
But these imbalances are not even the real problem. This is the real problem:
In textbooks, in textbooks, in textbooks
Forget the big, bad, dangerous Internet. The most influential and harmful media environment that kids find themselves in is schools, where they are exposed to traditional textbooks, history lessons, science programs, and library displays, all of which persistently erase diverse contributions to our history and allow the stories of primarily white men to shape people's imaginations and ambitions. Each time a child opens a book and reads a womanless history,⚠he or she learns that girls and women are worth less.
I am tired of reading: Where are the women? Where are the women in media? Where are the women in lawmaking? Where are the women in tech? Where are the women in fashion?Where are the women in protests? Where are the women in the administration? Where are the women in film? Where are the women in comedy, medicine, science, advertising, math?
The question isnât âWhere are the women?â Women are here. In large numbers. The question is âWhere are the good men who recognize that equal representation in culture is a moral imperative?â And I say men, because men, as a class, dominate leadership and cultural production, and write history.
Whole post is here:Â http://www.rolereboot.org/culture-and-politics/details/2014-03-answer-ridiculous-question-isnt-mens-history-month/
From:Â http://divasanddorks.com/womens-history-month-celebrating-black-women-in-fashion/Â