Okay, hot off the press in woke academia is a new master's thesis from the University of Northern Iowa in science education titled, "Autoethnography on Being a Queer Science Teacher in the Midwest." This one's crazy.
So autoethnography just means, "I wrote about myself and then called it data." And in this case, the data are just the author's own journal entries and school emails, which she used to study the quote, "complexities of navigating visibility, safety, and authenticity in the classroom while teaching science."
But by "while teaching science," she apparently just means while thinking almost exclusively about her queer identity, because the actual science teaching part is totally absent from this science education master's thesis.
I don't have time to break down this entire document, so I'll just highlight a few of the most insane parts.
Okay, so in one section, she writes about wanting to start a GSA club, a Gay Straight Alliance club at the middle school that she was teaching at. But the administrators were more than a little concerned that a club centered on sexuality and gender identity of fifth graders maybe wasn't entirely appropriate. When her principal asked why the GSA club was needed, she framed this reasonable question as institutional "gatekeeping" and a form of oppression against her queer identity.
Eventually, the principal compromised and limited the club to just seventh and eighth graders. She then describes an incident when a parent confronted her and accused her of convincing her daughter of being transgender at one of these GSA meetings, which she then dismissed as just a harmful stereotype against queer teachers influencing their kids. But later in the thesis, she says, quote, "starting a GSA is a visible act of activism," and that, quote, "in conservative Midwestern settings, just the presence of a GSA can shift public narratives about youth identity."
So the parents' concern was apparently totally justified because making kids question their gender identities and sexual identities is the entire point of a GSA in the first place.
This thesis also has a section titled "Pedagogical Approaches," which you might think is where the discussion about science education would be. But then she admits that there were no, quote, "sustained reflections centered specifically on lesson design, instructional frameworks, or science-specific pedagogy" in her journals and emails that she used as data.
But instead of viewing this as a total failure to take her job as a science teacher seriously, she claims that the very, quote, "absence of data on science teaching is itself meaningful" because it, quote, "suggests that my lived experience as a queer science teacher, identity negotiation, safety, and institutional navigation often overshadow writing and reflecting about my science lessons and teaching strategies."
Again, it all comes back to her queer identity and victimization. I think it's safe to say that what she calls "institutional barriers, administrative pushback, policy limitations, and parental concerns" looks a lot more like ordinary child safeguarding against adults like her who seem far too eager to make middle school a venue for sexual identity politics
By Emily Gomez, Published on 01/01/26
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the experiences of a queer teacher in the Midwest. It examines how my identity, community, and professional practice intersect within the schools I taught that had traditional cultural norms. Through analysis of key moments in my personal journals and school emails, this study highlights the complexities of navigating visibility, safety, and authenticity in the classroom while teaching science.
The research examines experiences in teaching science and advocating for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+) inclusion, including the formation of a student organization, the Gay–Straight Alliance (GSA). The data provides insight into how queer educators often serve as both teachers and informal advocates for marginalized students. At the same time, the study explores the emotional labor and career risks that accompany this role, specifically in Midwest communities where acceptance is evolving but not guaranteed in every space.
My autoethnography fills a gap in research on LGBTQ+ educators and highlights the importance of queer representation in schools, supportive school environments, and how queer educators transform and create spaces of belonging for students. Ultimately, this project seeks to show how queer teachers navigate their professional and personal identities in the Midwest while creating inclusive and affirming communities in their classrooms.