fashion week lodz: michał szulc
(images via marek makowski)
hmm. so i'm almost...not sure how to respond to this one. after two solid seasons at fashionphilosophy fashion week lodz that had me all-but-swooning at the altar of michał szulc (for a/w 2011 & s/s 2012) and his slightly-brooding-cool-loner-girl aesthetic, he suddenly turned around last season (a/w 2012) with a collection that felt a little more posh and commercial, as if joining the ranks of the upperclass societal types that once rejected him and led to some of his best work (or, at least, this is how i've come to think of all of it). which isn't ever to say homeboy isn't skilled. it's just a bit like when your one friend in school that liked experimental tuneage with you...suddenly starts listening to the popular kids' music and saying 'hi' to them as they pass. although she still claims to be your friend and like as she always did...you can feel the floor beginning to waver beneath you.
anyway, for me, mr. szulc's s/s 2013 range, 'violent', was like the next step in that inevitability: when you suddenly find out (though for some reason, she declined to tell you herself, making things seem all the more suspicious) that your friend happened to go to the cinema with one of the clique-y girls. in other words, it was an active show, with plenty of pieces that felt as though they'd been sourced from hip hop origins, and the best fashion blog (should we be offended at that name here?) announced that (in case you didn't get this already), the presentation was filled with "sportswear inspired silhouettes."
interestingly, on a facebook page that also includes the designer's official lookbook photos for the collection, the write-up announced some nonsense about how "these images have become a commentary on the reality around us," leading me to wonder if this is the manner in which the designer is going to try to justify his sudden turnaround. not that he needs to justify anything, but all the same, he has suddenly done an about-face when it comes to his aesthetic, and for those of us who had been fans of his more brooding, layered look, this might be something of a hard sell, especially when given that there wasn't a lot that was, yannow, like new here.
yet on the other hand, there are probably a good number of girls that will come newly to the designer's atelier, and bralet-type tops and zebra stripes always have kind of built-in audiences, no? anyway, sites like the polish cogdziezaile lauded it as (trans.) "very cheering," so there you go. the weirdos like us will just have to miss his layered, black, and asymmetrical days. the new michał szulc was all about bold hues, and the polish site kobieta (which, incidentally, also was pleased with the outcome) announced that (trans.) "(t)he surprise [was that] there were two strong colours: turquoise and pink," and we got plenty of foil-y metallic silver for good measure, as well.
anyway, i suppose we can all take some comfort, at least, in the fact that the clothes were well made: the website la mode noted that he worked largely with natural materials like coated cotton, silk, and taffeta, while adding that oversized skirts and dresses were the main story within the show. but! we also saw plenty of other pieces (sometimes with little to do with one another, which was another issue i kind of had here, as i did a bit last season--these two collections have coalesced less nicely than his prior shows): bomber and tuxedo jackets, skinny trousers, leggings, shirtdresses, anoraks, elastic-waisted shorts, menswear-style shirting, pleat skirts, the aforementioned bralets, and puffy pants.
now, i want to make sure to mention that i did like some of the pieces--particularly the pale blue-and-navy piped shirts and shirtdresses (as above and at top) that cropped up now and again throughout, and which had a certain tokyo flavour to them; if the designer had taken more time to experiment with fleshing out these ideas, i could well have loved the show. but on the other hand, he then tossed so many other ideas into the ring, with sometimes metallics (or patent shininess, which seemed to have little to do with anything else), some flowing skirt moments contrasting with the tennis/cheerleader-esque pleats, straight-up evening gowns, and so many different varieties of jacket that at some point my eyes blurred (really, was he trying to hit every style in the book as some sort of a graduation requirement or something?).
anyway, and interestingly (to me, at least), though no one really thought to do much in-depth analysis, the closest anyone got was fashion magazine blog, which--though they did like the show, it must be allowed--ended their write-up with the comment that (trans.) "(t)his looks great for the standard, rather than any great achievement." so, if i can analyse for a moment, it seems that they're saying, for a sporty show, it was a nice job. for anything else...not so much to see here. and okay. but really, i want to ask you to look deeper, to compare it with the designer's work of a year or two ago. how does it compare? doesn't it feel he's regressing, getting more random than moving forward? is this what success for a designer means? i'll let you think on that for a moment as you look at some of his old work...then come back and tell me you're not hoping for something a little more like the a/w 2011 show come next season (check out additional show images at elle).
(see the collection video here)