who is going to be my the interpretable feature to my uninterpretable feature

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from Philippines

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Argentina
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Kyrgyzstan

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Argentina
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
who is going to be my the interpretable feature to my uninterpretable feature
Take syntax they said, it will be fun they said.
No one:
No one at all:
Syntax: “I present an Occam’s razor type of argument....”
Chomsky: “he’s acting up, but don’t worry, it’s only a phase”
So as I read more literature from linguists who are critical of the mainstream framework, I'm becoming more and more convinced that most of it is totally on the wrong track.
Large parts of, if not most of, the stuff I'm being taught in Syntax class is false. Hooray.