This black and white film directed by Otto Preminger uses aspects of mise-en-scene and montage to give the spectator a place and inclusion into the film, becoming not only engulfed into it but having a hand in how the filmmaker would want to set up their shots. One scene I would like to examine would be the opening scene where the camera does a slow pan of the room, capturing all the fine glassware present in Waldo’s house as the detective inspects different pieces, setting the atmosphere of a rich man, who is most likely well educated. After the slow pan of the room, it then quickly shifts toward the voice of Waldo, revealing in writing in a bathtub, speaking toward his lavish lifestyle. This also gives the audience little time to prepare to see Waldo in this state which somewhat gives a humorous effect. The difference of not only the characters but also the camera work, according to The Evolution of the Language of Cinema provides, “... the creation of a sense or meaning not proper to the images themselves but derived exclusively from their juxtaposition”. Another thing I would like to examine would the next sequence in the scene which would be when Waldo is getting ready and is basically praising himself in front of the mirror, but instead, the audience’s eyes are instead focused into the little puzzle the detective plays with; not even the audience entertains his narcissism. The close up image of the puzzle can represent the main focus of the detective, which is to solve the mystery of Laura’s supposed murder. Which touches on another one of Andre Bazin’s theses of, “... which the image is evaluated not according to what it adds to reality but what it reveals of it.” Therefore, the opening scene uses different camera techniques to juxtapose the two characters as well as capture the setting accurately of Waldo along with the close up of the puzzle which provides deeper meanings in regular images.