Reminiscing
To be reeled into the certainty of the past Onto the sands of a memory As an evening fog rolls in

#iwtv#interview with the vampire#the vampire armand#assad zaman




seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from France

seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Jamaica

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Jamaica

seen from Malaysia
seen from Poland

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
Reminiscing
To be reeled into the certainty of the past Onto the sands of a memory As an evening fog rolls in
Its not a troll ask but where do you think whores go ? George has said that we will eventually find out . Do you think the place is more of a metaphor or is it an actual physical entity ? What is your interpretation of that line and how do you think it will be resolved in Tyrion's arc ?
I... think Tyrion murdered Tysha. And suppressed the traumatic memory.
Short summary why I think that.
Hints in the text.
More thoughts on memory edits.
A parallel to Lyanna in terms of secrecy and buried memory.
So, I am pretty sure that "wherever whores go" and Tyrion's persistent preoccupation with that phrase is a misdirection. He knows. But he doesn't want to know. But he will be made to remember, before the end.
Will we get to see a Godswood pool bathing scene involving Jonsa where Sansa's dyed hair turns Auburn ? Also isn't the Brienne Jaime bathtub scene a variation of Florian Jonquil ? Considering how Sansa is the character most associated with the tales of Florian Jonquil , I think the loss of the dye in the Godswood of Winterfell coupled with a revelation of some hidden information could be in the store ? Obviously it's mere speculations but what are your thoughts on this ?
Hi anon!
I think logistically it's unlikely.
While I like the idea a lot, I doubt that Sansa is going to hold off washing her hair until she and Jon have retaken Winterfell. Even if she held off washing her hair for the whole journey North (a matter of weeks), this would only be the start of their work in gathering the support and forces to face whichever Bolton is still opposing them. I'm sure we all agree that it would be anti-climactic if they waltzed into Winterfell unopposed as soon as Sansa arrived. She'll wash herself and her hair at some point much sooner.
Then there is the weather, which would have to heat up considerably to inspire Sansa to take a bath in the hot springs to wash her hair there. While the hot water may be fine, it's deep winter outside of it. Shenanigans under a layer of protective furs is one thing, shivering dripping wet in the winter wind while the freshly washed hair slowly freezes is quite another.
I do think the hot springs are a significant facet in their relationship but I suspect they will feature more directly in a past memory.
The story of Florian and Jonquil, which indeed is referenced more than once with Jaime and Brienne, and also as a dark mirror with Jon and Ygritte, is noted to begin at the pool, after all.
The pool from which the town took its name, where legend said that Florian the Fool had first glimpsed Jonquil bathing with her sisters, was so choked with rotting corpses that the water had turned into a murky grey-green soup. (ASOS, Jaime III)
Bathing with her sisters. Like the Starklings used to bathe in the hotsprings together.
Bran had bathed with his sisters hundreds of times and he'd seen serving women in the hot pools too. (ACOK, Bran II)
That would work much better with a past memory being revealed. Something that connects Florian and Jonquil to Jon's and Sansa's respective memory edits in ASOS, as well as the idea of a significant secret being revealed like Jaime did to Brienne in the Harrenhal bath.
I don't think their reunion will lose anything if the return of her own hair color is a moment for Sansa on her own. On the show it was a moment shared with Myranda ("This is my home and you cannot frighten me.") Which they immediately undercut by right away terribly frightening her with that rape and abuse plotline, but whatever.
Same as Jon's "He had his answer then." or Arya's "I am done with wooden teeth." this reclaiming of her identity is perhaps most powerful when handled on her own.
Tyrion and Tysha murder mystery hints - first mention in the text
This thing just keeps tugging at me, and this recent thread made me ambitious to examine it in more detail. So I’ll look at hints for an even darker edge to the story of Tyrion and Tysha in the parts of the text that actually mention her.
Since I have limited time, I’ll do several posts. This one is about how we learn about Tysha in A Game of Thrones.
How do you think the memory edit Sansa does in Blackwater would play out in future ? Like as GRRM said, leading to another memory lapse , so will there be any such event in the future which might accentuate the current memory rewrite into something different ?
Hi there!
GRRM never said it's leading to another memory lapse for Sansa specifically. That's a popular fanon that grew out of some interviews he did on the subject of unreliable POVs and the psychological effects of trauma.
He is setting up something else, something bigger, to do with fallible memory. But it could be anything from a different character misremembering, to the origin of the Others, to a popularly known "fact" being corrected... It's not specific to Sansa. At least, that's not how I read those interviews.
Will the Unkiss itself be addressed and resolved? Maybe..? It has an odd mirror in Jon's mental readjustment of his relationship with Ygritte in the cave, where he asks "were you a maid" even though he specifically notes the opposite before, and is suddenly "in love". I hope it means they'll both reassess what happened to them when confronted with similar situations with someone who is not a toxic abuser.
Or maybe that will remain subtext for the reader alone. We'll see. I can't imagine her having a heart-to-heart with the Hound about it.
I don't think we'll have another instance of trauma causing Sansa to create quite such a dramatic memory edit. She's not the only one who adjusts her memory, not by far, and it would kind of derail her momentum on the way home.
@ ygritte hate post. In broad strokes, we agree Jon and Sansa are on parallel journeys, there is also plenty of parallels between Hound's sexual assault night with Jon and Ygritte (steel kiss, hand on face, and so on). (1/3)
Then Jon gets into it at the water pool, that is his "unkiss", no doubt. Notice though, the details about him getting riled up by sex red hair, she saying she is half-fish, debating fucking your own sister. I'm forgetting stuff of course. I'm sure that chapter is rife with that. (2/3)
Jonsa fans have speculated over Unkiss being a cover for another kiss (always with the cousins, the blood and fire cloak, and so forth). It could be that cave means much the same for him. Like said they are on parallel journeys and there's all those throwbacks to each other. (3/3)
So like Sansa, Jon is repressing something there. Something that happened in the winterfell pools. Bran remembers bathing with his sisters, but unlike Bran (who did saw OSHA getting out of one in that segment), Jon saw something that was a revelation. Like Florian when he saw Jonquil bathing with her sisters. Something red and then wanted to kiss, not downstairs but upstairs. Maybe he did... and maybe Ned caught him at it, because he later dreams of being caught there being innapropriate. (4/3)
In the dream he screams he will never father a abstard, he hates being one for they are lustful creatures born of lust and lies. Like lusting after their sisters. Its not like he is a Targaryen! Distraught, Jon decides to prove his nature wrong. He is not a deviant because he is a bastard lusting after his sister! So he decides to go to the Nights Watch, where he'll be chaste ever. Maybe. Kind of creepy but funny. It all comes together too, all those tidbits that are otherwise scattered. (5/3)
PS: Six maidens in the pool... Six Stark children. Not seven for once either way. And so Jon says in the show "we should have never left Winterfell" because it echoes the We shouldn't have left the cave. And Jon says they'll go back and Yggrite yaps You Know Nothing, but he was right. Jon will go back with the real redhead Sansa, back to Winterfell real pools. (6/3)
Thank you!! This ask really sent my brain whirring.
I already like the idea of the Unkiss drawing from a repressed memory, but I hadn’t noticed how the Ygritte memory-edit might interlock with that.
If Sandor is Sansa's abuser then why does she want him around her.She doesnt wish Tyrion,LF,Marillion's presence around her.I think GRRM intentionally kept the Hound in Quiet Isle even when he could have him killed because his narrative is not over & I think when he comes back healed,he & Sansa will enter into a consensual relationship.Why would GRRM let Sansa think of Sandor numerous times fondly throughout 4 books if it's not to have a romantic payoff?
Hi anon,
sometimes I wonder why some readers equate “thinking of” with “thinking of fondly”. Sansa doesn’t think of the Hound with affection or longing. She simply thinks of him.
1) Sansa is quite capable of compartmentalizing her abuse at the Hound’s hand from the ways he had also been a form of protection to her. He had been one of the few people we see actually talk to Sansa since.. ever. Her Father didn’t. The Septa didn’t. Jeyne was removed from her. The Hound is one of the few people who asked her what she thought, and had actual conversations with her about the world around her.
But no, that does not in any way cancel out the fact that he grabbed, frightened, belittled and assaulted her. It just means she is that isolated and frightened.
Sansa is my favorite character. Hands down, she is one of the most the most interesting POV's for me. Her lapses in memory are particularly interesting & how GRRM says it's setting up for a bigger lapse. I have a creeping inkling lately after reading her chapters. Sansa doesn't seem to think back with guilt on telling Cersei Ned's plans. WE know it didn't change Cersei's plans but I think Sansa buries it. Do you think this may come up & be her "lapse" in memory? I worry about her... Am I nuts?
Hi anon!
I don’t know. Her telling Cersei about Ned’s plans is likely to play into the conflict between her and Arya when they reunite but she does acknowledge that she was being willful and she does acknowledge being deceived in her trust in Cersei.
Once she had loved Prince Joffrey with all her heart, and admired and trusted his mother, the queen. They had repaid that love and trust with her father's head. Sansa would never make that mistake again.
(ACOK, Sansa I)
It is not Sansa’s fault that the adults around her were playing a game of lethal politics and Ned never warned her, and I’m pretty sure that Sansa not dwelling on it is actually a simple case of not taking the blame for something that wasn’t her fault.
I’m not sure why this would be subject to a massive memory lapse. What would it accomplish, story-wise, for her to have forgotten this and then remember it? This un-information doesnt’t carry much narrative weight.
I actually doubt the popular fanon that the emphasis on unreliable narrators is meant to “set up” a big future memory lapse for Sansa in particular.
It’s hard to find quotes on this, but these seem prominent:
Here’s a really particular question (which I realize means it probably won’t get asked in a general interview): In A Storm of Swords, there is a chapter early on where Sansa is thinking back to the scene at the end of A Clash of Kings when The Hound came into her room during the battle. She thinks in the chapter about how he kissed her, but in the scene in A Clash of Kings, this actually didn’t happen. Was that a typo or something? —Valdora
It’s not a typo. It is something! [Laughs] ”Unreliable narrator” is the key phrase there. The second scene is from Sansa’s thoughts. And what does that reveal about her psychologically? I try to be subtle about these things. (Entertainment Weekly November 27, 2007)
Or here:
[GRRM is asked about Sansa misremembering the name of Joffrey's sword.]
The Lion's Paw / Lion's Tooth business, on the other hand, is intentional. A small touch of the unreliable narrator. I was trying to establish that the memories of my viewpoint characters are not infallible. Sansa is simply remembering it wrong. A very minor thing (you are the only one to catch it to date), but it was meant to set the stage for a much more important lapse in memory. You will see, in A STORM OF SWORDS and later volumes, that Sansa remembers the Hound kissing her the night he came to her bedroom... but if you look at the scene, he never does. That will eventually mean something, but just now it's a subtle touch, something most of the readers may not even pick up on. (Taken from here, June 26, 2001)
The main take-away here is that GRRM wants us to know ALL the POVs are unreliable narrators.
The other thing is that he talks about Sansa’s psychological approach to trauma: rewrite, re-interpret, romanticise. Which is really something that points at the situation she rewrites being traumatic (as opposed to romantic), not Sansa’s supposed psychological instability, as some people like to surmise.
She is not alone in this. It is how Westeros employs metaphor. A “kiss” becomes a metaphor for a knife at your throat, which is an image that comes up in the novels again and again and again. A war of succession becomes a “Dance of Dragons”, a swordfight is compared to sexual intercourse. This play of images is as important as the mismemory.
It’s also important to note that it is NOT Sansa who misremembers the name of the sword (it is Arya who recalls it as Lion’s Paw instead of Lion’s Tooth in ASOS, Arya VI), nor is that the only example of edited memories. Jon does it with Ygritte’s “maidenhood”, Arya misremembers her age when she first killed (eight v. nine or ten), Cersei misremembers how much Sansa revealed to her in the first place. Surely there are plenty other examples.
So actually, the memory lapse he claims to be setting up may not even be about Sansa specifically. It may involve her, but it may also be as distant as, say, historical memory involving the Long Night, or another character, or a memory involving the past that has already been brought up, etc.
I’m not saying it cannot be about Sansa or a future memory loss, but I think we can easily broaden our horizon on this.
What I am certain about is that Sansa’s “Horrible Act of Betrayal(tm)” is nowhere near big enough to warrant the “much more important lapse in memory” treatment GRRM is teasing.