seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from France
seen from China

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from Czechia
Misotheist | For the Glory of Your Redeemer | 5th February, 2021
Norwegian Black Metal
Artwork by Jacques Callot
More news to follow...
Is there a term for simply believing gods unworthy of worship instead of non-existing? Or does that fall under the umbrella of agnosticism?
Agnosticism concerns knowledge. Atheism concerns belief.
I regard myself as an agnostic atheist. I don’t claim to know that no gods exist (although I will say the god of the bible cannot exist), but I necessarily conclude from everything presented to me so far that none exist (see also: Null hypothesis). This isn’t a claim of knowledge - I find the gods “Not Guilty” of existing, rather than “Innocent” of existing. If someone can reliably, verifiable prove one or more of the various gods exist, then I will believe. Until then, I remain skeptical.
I’m not quite sure I understand what you mean by “believing gods unworthy of worship instead of non-existing.” If “instead of” applies to the person, rather than the terminology, this seems to suggest someone who believes they do exist, but don’t think very much of it/them to worship it/them. This would make them a theist, as that term refers to holding belief.
If this is true, they might be described as a misotheist (”hatred of god”), or a dystheist (belief that god is not wholly good, and possibly evil). Although that might depend on why they found the god(s) unworthy, while still believing it/they do exist.
If it was more a case of the “instead of” applying to the terminology rather than the person, then they’re likely just an atheist. I don’t believe any gods exist, but there are very few gods I’ve ever heard anyone describe that weren’t petty, arbitrary and rather loathsome. Just like how I find Jar Jar Binks to be a particularly odious character. (Although, the villain theory makes him much more interesting.)
“Anything that wants to be worshipped is not worthy of even respect, much less worship.” - Jonathan Harper
I don’t aspire to have anyone or anything worship me. A higher form of life should have better self-esteem, be more self-possessed than a random imperfect human such as myself. Otherwise, it would be as pathetic as me getting my self-esteem and validation by demanding a nest of ants worship me. Anything that needed worship would be, by definition, imperfect - so, why would you worship it at all? Any existent god that was perfect would have no need of worship. Therefore, either way, god or no god, worship would be utterly pointless and unnecessary.
But this is ultimately trumped by my lack of belief anyway. Can’t hate or decline to worship a god that I find no reason to think exists in the first place. It’s more of a theoretical, a mental exercise to evaluate the position of those who do believe.
So, terminology for that might just be a skeptic. Or perhaps a book critic.
i know the pillars of eternity pantheon could be described using a dystheist view at best, and not to once again project onto a fictional thing instead of dealing with my problems head on, but the fact that aloth’s key-breaker sceptre has a special function called ‘misotheist’???? oh im vibing
MISOTHEIST-UNANSWERED THRICE
MISOTHEIST-STIGMA