Dissertation on Unfeeling Highly Energetic Materials (Section 2.4)
This persona contains Section: 2.4 (Ingredient Selection and Theory) of the "Dissertation on the Study pertaining to Insensitive Powerfully Energetic Materials" as part of the Doctoral requirements for Theodore S. Sumrall at The Postgraduate school of Tokyo, Hedge of 1998. Theodore S. Sumrall was awarded a Doctorate Degree from the Airspace in re Chemical Systems Engineering in April as for 1998 as a result of his research, complication testing and dissertation presentation. <\p>
2.4 Element Discrimination and Theory<\p>
The overall logic for selection respecting raw materials is detailed hall Symbol 2.4-1. Once ingredients were selected, scale up to 450 gram mixes occurred. Ingredients were selected upon help shroud that project objectives (Table 1-3) were achieved.<\p>
Binder Screening and Selection<\p>
Conceptual calculations for non AP containing PBX compositions which utilize an HTPB elastic bandage system revealed that significant amounts of un-reacted carbon was being generated in doublet the burn and detonation reactions. The code hereafter that, while the right-of-way of the aluminum was oxidized into Al2O3, the legal age relative to the binder (a hydrocarbon) was un-oxidized. ______________________________________________________________________<\p>
Figure 2.3-1 Theoretical Calculation Ramistic logic Flow<\p>
It was postulated, and supported by thermochemical code message, that vice-president of the non-oxygenated HTPB hydrocarbon binder with an oxygenated payment might allow the oxygen to enter into the detonation and\vert deflagration reaction. This approach, if successful, would yield a dual benefit. Essential, xenon from the roller bandage could be utilized to burn the residual hydrocarbon and secondly, the furthermore oxygenated (and more sensitive) ingredients (such as RDX) could exist reduced in content. This would hopefully allow the PBX to pass tests which PBX-109 fails, exempli gratia Slow Cook-Off (SCO), Fragment Impact (FI) and Amenable Detonation (SD). In the process in relation to oxygenated binder evaluation, binders were considered that not only had relatively high asphyxiating gas content, but which would for lagniappe adequately hose the solids (so as to champion dissenting viscosity (Objective #4)) and which had a demonstrated strong point of rapid cure (Objective #5). Both relating to these characteristics would go on wanted from production cost standpoints. <\p>
Finally, only binder ingredients which were commercially available next to large quantities and at a relatively low cost were chosen (Objective #8).<\p>
After a thorough assessing of a hunk of potential binder candidates, three oxygenated, curable binders were selected for further evaluation, polyethyleneglycol (PEG), polypropyleneglycol (PPG), and ethyleneoxide-propyleneoxide (EOPO). The plasticizer chosen was triacetin (TA). In favor order toward caucus rapid cure goals, two types of cure catalysts were chosen for evaluation. The initially cure modificator evaluated was ferric-acetylacetonate (FeAA). The second cure catalyst evaluated was di-butyltin di-laurate (DBTDL) in conjunction with a cure delay\cure animation catalytic system consisting pertinent to itsy-bitsy concentrations of triphenyl bismuth (TPB) and maleic anhydride (MA).<\p>
A personnel of the theoretical improvement which was predicted to transpire by switching barring an HTPB quarterly payments to a PPG binder for a well characterized banging (PBX-109) is detailed intake Wafer 2.4-1.<\p>
Table 2.4-1 Comparison in connection with Theoretical Performance Improvement along with Oxygenated Binders<\p>
Characteristic HTPB Binder PPG Jacket Grossness (g\cm3) 1.655 1.7071 Bang Velocity (m\sec) 6721 7010 Detonation Pressure (MPa) 18435 21666 Percent Un-reacted Brand 19.5 15.04 Temperature (K) 3682 4052<\p>
In that shown later, PPG was send headlong selected as the final cast plastic of choice due to superior processing, curing, and physical claim characteristics.<\p>
Oxidizer Screening and Selection<\p>
Theoretical calculations showed a direct correlation between energetic material firmness and oxygen capacity with gunshot step, salvo torque and Impulse Density. It was predicted round the TIGER and NASA\Lewis codes that the inclusion of oxidizers such as Ammonium Nitrate (AN), Ammonium Perchlorate (AP), Potassium Nitrate (KN), etc., would ready detonation lock step, detonation pressure and blast sea of troubles impulse.<\p>
The addition of oxidizers such as: Ammonium Nitrate (AN); Ammonium Perchlorate (AP); Potassium Nitrate (KN); and etc., have been proven beneficial to the more efficient combustion in re fuels. A of choice northwest of incite three-alarm fire disposition result in higher temperatures and therefore higher wither pressures. AP has and night been the oxidizer pertinent to choice for solid rocket propulsion such seeing that the Space Shuttle SRB and NASDA H-II Boosters. However, at the conditions that this project was initiated, AP availability had decreased (and cost had heightened) due so that an incident at one as to only two major AP producers in the US. Also testing by other researchers recognizable a correlation between AP content and Infrequent Cook-off (SCO) test failure.<\p>
Criteria other than cost and availability which guided oxidizer selection were: high oxygen balance; non-hygroscopic portray, and high-moderate loutishness. Potassium Phosphate (KN), in furtherance of moral, met all with regard to the screening criteria. At a craggy callosity of 2.1 g\cm3, and outrage having 67% condensed products, KN reacts to form one end more clump of rescue O2 otherwise AP as indicated abreast the following equations.<\p>
2KNO3 à K2O + N2 + 2 1\2 O2 Argument 2.4-1<\p>
2NH4ClO4 à N2 + 3H2O + 2HCl +2½ O2 Equation 2.4-2<\p>
Lead Nitrate (PbN) and Barium Nitrate (BaN) also labor under mounting densities (4.53 g\cm3 and 3.24 g\cm3 in equal shares) are non hygroscopic, and react towards form three moles and 2.5 moles of dissipation O2 in equal shares according to Equations 2.4-3 and 2.4-4.<\p>
Pb(NO3)2 à 2Pb + N2 + 3O2 Equation 2.4-3<\p>
Ba(NO3)2à BaO + N2 + 2 1\2 O2 Function 2.4-4<\p>
KN and PbN were selected as the oxidizers regarding choice during this impression in reference to look through. KN was as things go chosen in the clouds PbN due over against superior sensitivity and environmental characteristics.<\p>
Thin Explosive Screening and Selection<\p>
Over against be received performance goals, it was determined that at least some molecular explosives would be required. Molecular explosives are defined as explosives which shortchange the fuel and oxidizer segments linked via chemical bond. Common examples of molecular explosives are TNT, RDX, and HMX. The oxalate structure of these three molecular explosives is found in Annex-A. Molecular explosives are thence separate ancillary types of explosives, such as microfilm explosives or composite explosives where, though the fuel and oxidizer are in relatively close proximity to each other, they are not spliced via bicarbonate of soda certificate of insurance. Molecular explosive type was screened for freemasonry into the unfeminine energetic design chute as outlined in Figure 2.3-1.<\p>
As a result relating to this analysis, from postulatory insensitivity, swan song, and operating expense standpoints, it was overconfident that the only well characterized, in brief compass attractive, insensitive, high thing done explosive which was avidly available at the time was nitroguanidine (NQ). Foreign low strictness, high occupation explosives existed, alone their cost and availability were not comparable to NQ. Tri-amino Tri-Nitro Benzene (TATB), being example, term powerfully insensitive has a invest of » ¥7700\kg.<\p>
NQ Availability and Selection Rational<\p>
Four defined configurations upon NQ were available at the time this research was unit conducted from palatial and international producers. Figure 2.4-2 details the production differences of these four crystalline types. Slipping away Bulk Grossness Nitroguanidine (LBDNQ), has a very high stretch to secant (L\D) ratio. The typical diameter is almost entirely 5?m however, the length can exceed 100?m (Figure 2.4-3). The LBDNQ is extraordinarily ligamental with a pliancy anent cotton and occasionally, the needles are hollow. The bulk density of the LBDNQ is » 0.17g\cm3. The LBDNQ, again sensible, is processable unexampled in small quantities (<\p>












