I don’t mind at all. :-)Elsevier has a number of rather…INTERESTING business practices, shall we say. They charge extremely high prices to libraries for their journals (with profit margins up to 40% in some cases). Often, the only possibility for libraries to afford them is to buy huge package deals, or “bundles” and have no say over what gets included. (Think of it like a cable package–you might pay a lot of money to watch the three channels you want.)As is standard in scholarly publishing, Elsevier pays its authors….nothing. They therefore get their content for free and proceed to sell it back to the academics and institutions that produced it at absurdly high rates. (Other scholarly publishers do this as well, but Elsevier has the most notoriety because it’s kind of a behemoth and its prices are even more insane than the rest.)This, as you can imagine, is not terribly good for research. When libraries are struggling to afford the materials that academics produce–sometimes academics that their very own universities–it puts a huge strain on the library budget. But the library can’t just decide to not get these journals, because you can’t, for example, be a leading scientific research institution whose students and academics have no access to the important journals in the field. So the publishers, most notably Elsevier, have a captive audience that they take full advantage of. There have been petitions and protests from academics for years regarding Elsevier’s business practices.In summary, they’re profit-seeking leeches who take advantage of the fact that universities need their product (the content of which is provided to them, for free, by the academics of those same universities) to survive as research institutions.I hope that helps explain things! Feel free to ask if you have any other questions.