Vanessa Redgrave Goes Mod by Nathaniel Thompson
As a moviegoer, there’s a certain joy in watching actors evolve over the years, especially when their careers span several decades and you can see how their looks, body language and vocal deliveries change with the times. Just watch a sampling of films starring Meryl Streep, Daniel Day-Lewis or Isabelle Huppert, and it’s like jumping in an instant time machine as you get to observe an artist in transformation. One of the most fascinating examples in the past century has to be the great Vanessa Redgrave, who’s firmly enshrined as one of the shining lights of British acting royalty and, though not really thought of today as a movie star in the conventional sense, a steady and often astonishing presence on the big screen since the late ‘50s.
You can find a handy selection of Redgrave’s work studded throughout FilmStruck and The Criterion Channel in a currently running spotlight encompassing 11 titles as of this writing, ranging all the way from her 1958 debut in BEHIND THE MASK to her indelible turn in VENUS (2006). However, I’ve always had a certain fascination with Redgrave’s work in the second half of the 1960s when Swinging London came into its own and became an epicenter of pop culture innovations from fashion to music to movies, and even architecture and public transportation. And no film represents that state of all things London better than BLOW-UP (‘66), a milestone that can now be enjoyed here for the first time or the 15th.
BLOW-UP can sound like a daunting film if you read reviews or try to sift through the stacks of academic papers written about Michelangelo Antonioni’s celebrated, taboo-pushing premiere feature shot in English. He was already a darling of the art house circuit thanks to his quartet of existential brain ticklers: L’AVVENTURA (‘60), LA NOTTE (‘61), L’ECLISSE (‘62) and THE RED DESERT (‘64). His shift to color with that last film really laid the groundwork for what he did with BLOW-UP, a radical expansion of an enigmatic short story by Argentine writer Julio Cortázar about an amateur photographer whose worldview is upended one day while taking some dockside shots. The slippery narrative in the film is a puzzle with no clear answer, taking fashion photographer David Hemmings through a series of encounters that leave him in a radically altered state of perception. It actually isn’t a difficult film at all if you just roll with it and realize you’re watching what amounts to a cinematic Rorschach test whose colors, movement and music are meant to provoke ideas and responses more strongly than the mystery itself which remains in limbo.
At the heart of that mystery is Redgrave herself, playing a mysterious woman who approaches Hemmings to retrieve the negatives for a series of possibly incriminating photographs he’s taken in the park (whose grass was famously spray painted an intense shade of green as part of Antonioni’s bold color experimentation). She’s the perfect casting choice here as her nervous temperament is masterfully conveyed by her choreographed physical responses to Hemmings’ character with unpredictable gestures keeping the viewer sifting through her possible motives and emotions even on repeated viewings. It’s also a bold choice in that she spends a significant portion of her screen time topless, albeit discreetly framed and posed for the most part; rather than showing vulnerability or desire as most nude scenes are designed to do, her exposure here is strange, chilly and unsettlingly beautiful. The film’s then-shocking levels of sexuality and nudity were a big conversation piece back in the day and played a big role in the film’s box office success, despite the fact that MGM defied the Production Code and set up a temporary company to release it so the more extreme content wouldn’t be censored. Redgrave and company ended up playing a big role in the dismantling of the Code itself, which would soon give way to the MPAA system we all know today.
As the daughter of actor Michael Redgrave and part of the acting dynasty that also includes Lynn Redgrave, Joely Richardson, the late Natasha Richardson and (via marriage) Franco Nero, Vanessa Redgrave was already a firmly established theatre star when BLOW-UP, only her third credited feature film. However, 1966 would turn out to be quite a year for her as she also appeared in the counterculture comedy MORGAN – A SUITABLE CASE FOR TREATMENT, which netted her first of six Oscar nominations (with one win for 1977’s JULIA), and a surprise turn in what would prove to be the year’s Oscar winner for Best Picture, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS (‘66), Fred Zinneman’s depiction of the turbulent fate of Sir Thomas More when he locked horns with King Henry VIII. Here Redgrave decided for sheer enjoyment to appear in an extended cameo as Anne Boleyn, accepting neither payment nor credit for the role opposite her brother, Corin Redgrave. Also seen in a more prominent role in the 1988 made-for-TV remake, she gives the film a significant jolt when she appears, her piercing eyes managing to convey everything we need to know about her ill-fated character as soon as she appears. (Her wedding, incidentally, was added to the film and does not appear in the source play.) Only 29 years old at the time, she more than holds her own her in her few minutes of screen time opposite such heavy hitters as Paul Scofield, Orson Welles, Robert Shaw and Wendy Hiller—and the film itself is still one of the very best costume dramas ever made.
If watching these two films isn’t enough Redgrave for you, there are still nine other ones left to stream until your heart’s content. Just be sure to check out that ‘60s pairing for a look at the range she displayed at the height of Britain’s 20th century cultural influence, creating a screen presence that planted the seeds for her later roles that decade during her “Franco Nero period” in CAMELOT (‘67), ISADORA (‘68), and the fascinating, often overlooked Italian chiller A QUIET PLACE IN THE COUNTRY (‘68), which finds her using her BLOW-UP skills to unnerving effect. There’s really no one else out there like her.