Thats just having a kink in being programed (the forced plurarity kink)
ah... yeah I've identified with that a lot. it's interesting how much transIDs overlap with kink but it makes sense

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Norway

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Belarus
seen from China
seen from China

seen from Poland
seen from China
seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
Thats just having a kink in being programed (the forced plurarity kink)
ah... yeah I've identified with that a lot. it's interesting how much transIDs overlap with kink but it makes sense
⎯⎯ Attractional Conabuse :
A conabuse dynamic in which one or both parties experience some form of attraction , including platonic , to another .
Those who are in consensually abusive dynamics with friends , partners , etc - Can be considered as attractional con ( abusers / victims )
When one sided , a party may refer to themselves as a platonic consensual victim , for example .
⎯⎯ Nonattractional Conabuse :
A conabuse dynamic in which one or both parties experience no attraction ( in any manner ) to another .
Those who are in consensually abusive dynamics with those they are not attracted to in any manner - Can be considered as nonattractional con ( abusers / victims ) .
When one sided , a party may refer to themselves as a nonattractional consensual abuser , for example .
︶︶︶ ︶︶︶ ︶︶︶
This is a label you choose for yourself or agree to with the other party ; please do not use these as descriptors for those who have not explicitly labeled themselves this way or agreed to being called these labels .
︶︶︶ ︶︶︶ ︶︶︶
⎯⎯ Do not involve this post in discourse .