#on men

[crashingcryptid]

it’s my birthday, put Simon in a babydoll dress, PLEASEEEE

HAPPY BIRTHDAY MILLIEMOOCOW!! HAPPY BIRTHDAY TOO YOU!!

Simon tries to pull the dress a little lower down on his legs, but it's useless. He's surprised that the baby doll dress even fits him, the soft fabric feeling far to delicate for his giant frame.

"Si, baby, is it on?" You call from the other side of the door, but you don't open it yet. Simon had confessed after a year of dating you that sometimes he wished he could wear your dresses.

The night gowns looked so soft and comfortable, and the baby doll style looked so flattering on you, he began to imagine it on himself. He hadn't expected you to buy him one of his own, and he didn't expect himself to actually put it on.

"Si?"

"It's on! Sorry, just... Don't know if I like it." Simon cringes at his words. He does like it. He loves it. The soft fabric, the way it didn't cling to tight to his body, the way it made him feel soft and beautiful.

"Can I come in?" You press gently, wondering if Simon would let you see this vulnerable moment of his. "Or we can try again another day. You don't have to show me right now."

"You can come in." He says it so queitly you almost don't hear him, carefully opening the bedroom door and stepping inside. He looked stunning, and the soft blue color looked lovely on him. You could see the uncertainty in his eyes, heartbreaking as you realize you've never seen him so vulnerable with himself.

"Holy shit, baby. That looks beautiful on you." You murmur in awe, his eyes lighting up slightly as he fiddles with the hem of his skirt.

"You think so?" He wonders as you step closer and take his hands.

"You look pretty, Si. Really pretty. Do you like it?" You question, pointedly ignoring how well you could see his cock pressing against the dress.

"Mmhm." Simon hums shyly, showing you a submissive part of himself neither of you knew.

"Pretty girl, if you want more dresses, you have to tell me, okay?" You tease as you pull him closer and place a kiss on his lips. "And if you want me to make you cum, you have to ask." You murmur against his lips, leaving him hard and leaking into the silk and lace of his new dress.

[xanaxfarts]

i love the way a mans skin smells after being hard at work or playing in the sun all day. it does something to me biologically that makes me feral. greeting him at the door when he comes home, laying by the water nestling my nose as close as i can into his underarm, after a long bedroom session it doesn't matter i love it so much ill take it any way i can get it

[keziah-the-bloodwitch]

Is it only me who does this but when you get a request from a guy on social media, do y’all accept it and play along with their shit just to test whether they’re red flags or green flags? I mean, I typically see them all as red flags cuz why did you message me in the first place? Idek who tf y’all are and you’ve got the balls to approach my account? Y’all probs do the fkin same other every girl so no I ain’t gonna fall for your shit.

Plus, it’s my way of experimenting on men.

I compare the differences with every guy that messaged me and join up the red flags altogether. Lol.

Oh yeah and before anyone calls me a slut, just remember no man has seen my body and I haven’t even gotten past the holding hangs stage.

[hozieresque]

[broken-academia]

“A man has manliness if he exercises self-restraint and curbs the impulses that are contrary to right reason, or curbs himself so as not to indulge in desires contrary to the right reason. A good man has few needs; he has wants in consequence of his body, and his birth itself, but he is taught by rational self-control to want few things.”

— St. Cyril of Alexandria, the Stromata: book ii. chapter xviii “the Mosaic Law” (emphasis mine)

[mortdubonheurmasculin]

Conversations About Home (at the Deportation Centre), Warsan Shire

[floatingbook]

On men, male-partnered ‘feminists’, and logic

- A lesbian perspective. (09/11/2020)

Just so we are clear about terms here, women are adult human females. Men are adult human males. Feminism is a movement fuelled by theory aimed at women’s liberation. Liberation means that we have to be liberated from something. If you have eyes and ears and are reading this, you are probably aware that women are consistently discriminated against on the basis of their sex by men and the institutions they have built and perpetuate, by among others (not an exhaustive list) of sexual assault and rape, control over our bodies and their reproductive capacities, theological lowering, persecution of lesbians, diminished economic and financial prospects, prostitution, pornography, the enforcing of strict norms over our existences, or plain murder. Men are doing this to us. Men are the problem we face if as women we want to live our lives free from oppression.

So why would women who are well aware of the source of our continued misery (men, if you needed a reminder) still want to date men? In the world we live in, there is no man devoid of misogyny (and if there was one, he would not be dating you, he would be spending all his waking hours trying to reform his fellow men, as anything less given the state of things is misogyny). So if a woman wants to date a man, knowing what she knows about men being constant oppressors of women, she has to not care about his misogyny. She knows, and yet she says “I don’t mind”, “It’s not enough of a deal-breaker”. How do you set the bar as to the level of misogyny you will tolerate? Is it enough if he doesn’t beat and rape you? Don’t you mind having to clean up after him all the time, being expected to do all the dishes, gaining no financial independence beyond some support as long as he tolerates you, his consumption of porn, his potential molestation of your hypothetical children? Is it fine if he is only a misogynist to other women and not you, talking over his female colleagues, doing nothing about the skewered wage gap in his favour, never voting for a woman in elections, saying nothing when other men are being predators? How do you make peace with the fact that you are reinforcing men’s expectation of a sexual partner and, quite often, maid as something they deserve just by being alive and breathing men? How do you enter into a partnership with a man knowing that in doing so, you’re upholding the patriarchal mean of control that is marriage, meant to pass women from father to husband as pieces of property, an institution that will do its best to sever your links to other women? No man is special; no man is free of misogyny.

How do you call yourself a ‘radical feminist’ and say that male-attracted women shouldn’t be expected not to date, partner with or marry men, if we ever are to achieve women’s liberation? What is your logic? Are you saying that women cannot be expected to survive without regular sex? In which case, how can you then tell ‘incels’ that they are not entitled to a woman’s body? Because your logic then is that sex is a need. Or are you saying that women can have no life without a man`? In that case, why are you even concerned by women’s liberation? By your logic, it would kill all male-attracted women. Or are you saying that women can have no fulfilling life without a man? In that case, maybe talk to all the celibate male-attracted women who are celibate because they have realised that men are nothing but a danger to us, or to any celibate woman really. Our lives are good. Plus, do you see how reductive that reasoning is? You can have a perfectly fine and happy and fulfilling life without tying yourself up to a man. You are a full person in your own right. You don’t need a man in your life to have succeeded at at the game called existence. Especially given the circumstances and the fact that any men will likely make your life worse.

So if you know, why do you insist that choosing to date men is anything other that a negative choice for yourself and the women around you? Sure, we don’t make our choices in a vacuum, and for most women that means never questioning the logic behind dating men. But we also don’t make our choices in a vacuum, and that means that if you do know what your decision entails, you are supporting misogyny and patriarchy by dating men. Heterosexual partnerships are not neutral relationships in the world we live in. Because in most countries, and certainly for most of the women reading this, women can now have their own finances and are no longer forced into marriages to survive. What is your excuse? Because, while you would not be to blame if a man abused you, if you are aware of the danger, you should act to prevent that danger of harming you. Think of it like vaccines; the probability that you will ever encounter some of the diseases we get vaccinated against are extremely low, but we still get vaccinated to prevent harm. Maybe he won’t abuse you, maybe he won’t be an overt misogynist to you, but he will still be a misogynist. So why risk it? Why? What’s your logic, when you’re on the other hand pretending to want women’s liberation?

Note, before anyone starts clowning, that lesbians criticising heterosexual partnerships in relation to women’s oppression are not advocating for male-attracted women to date us instead or being jealous because they are single. We are tired of the constant misogyny and homophobia in our lives and are trying to do something about it.