Discerning spirits: divine and demonic possession in the middle ages | Nancy Caciola

seen from Russia
seen from China

seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil

seen from Russia
seen from Poland
seen from Argentina

seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Brazil
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Yemen
Discerning spirits: divine and demonic possession in the middle ages | Nancy Caciola
Discerning spirits: divine and demonic possession in the middle ages | Nancy Caciola
Abstraction could be and was applied to a host of other ambiguous “bodily signs” or possessed behaviors. Indeed, it is no exaggeration to state that there were two kinds of spirit possession in the Middle Ages, one malign and one benign, that were outwardly indistinguishable from one another. Both were attended by spectacular abilities: “Though miraculous abilities can be gifts that God bestows upon the faithful for the confirmation of the faith the revelation of the future, or gift of prophecy; the understanding of supernatural things, or gift of wisdom; and the understanding of human things, or gift of knowledge—nevertheless, similar things also can be, and are, accomplished by evil spirits.” This juxtaposition led to an epistemological conundrum for the medieval Church on both the local community level and the translocal, institutional level. How could one tell the difference between divine and demonic possession? The Adversary could so easily deceive the unwary. The demonic character delighted in deception: leading human beings into falsehood was understood to be a basic goal of the demonic hosts. Thus fears about hypocrisy and false sanctity were important currents in later medieval thought, and the ecclesiastical leadership of the time sought to disseminate these concerns among the broader population. One should not reflexively venerate anyone who appears to be saintly, but exercise caution.
Discerning spirits: divine and demonic possession in the middle ages | Nancy Caciola
to clarify a point on the previous post, i think part of the necessity of the consent is that the soul is the only thing that really belongs to a person and so the angel needs permission to anchor to that. not so with bodies. or demons.
this discussion of consent and possession has not even touched on the incredible horror narrative that spn was building!! they didn't lean into it hard enough!!! fuck them for that!
sometimes i do be thinking about the whole sam and dean as lucifer and michael's perfect vessels thang. like an angel could take possession of anyone with consent and the physical form binds their energy in such a way that leaves them vulnerable to injury, which i suppose is part of the reason lucifer/michael require vessels so as one can actually destroy the other, hence dean being called a "sword". but you could do that with any body i don't think their power would be limited by the vessel's human strength because like... the weakest angel is probably many times stronger than the strongest man.
so if isn't about their bodies, it has to be about their souls, right? this does track with canon in the sense that sam and dean are fated souls/soulmates and fated births to john and mary specifically. and i think this also ties into the possession's requirement of consent and the idea that comes up later in the show of the soul being a very specific and powerful energy that many supernatural beings including angels desire. i think that in the case of demons it's more about the body--it's what allows them to properly manipulate the world around them and although they have some extra strength and telekinesis and such they are further limited by the body than angels are. they can take over a body without consent since they have corrupted souls already. they push aside the soul and do whatever they wish.
something similar happens with angels in the sense of they can also control the body (in general) without the soul's consent when they have received consent once. but i also think that the soul is the main thing that fuels them. why do you need consent to possess the body as an angel? they are far more powerful than demons and demons can do it at will. part of this is ofc the fact that the writers needed to cast the angels in a bit of a better light, but i think that it's mainly about the power of the soul. i think that angels need human soul power to tether themselves properly to earth. i think that the soul is this bit of divine energy they need to anchor themselves into to be able to be tied into a human vessel without incinerating it. i think that the stronger the soul, the stronger the angel can be. this is part of why these angels are obsessed with consent and making sure sam and dean remain in their bodies, alive. because it's not about the body, it's about the soul.