Female figurines, Gravettian period (35-22ka)
From left to right: Willendorf, Monpazier, Dolní Věstonice, Frasassi, Sireuil, Laussel, Laussel, Kostyonki III, Kostyonki IV, Moravany, Renancourt, Laussel
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
seen from China
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from Spain

seen from Yemen
seen from Spain
seen from China
seen from France
seen from Brazil

seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
seen from T1
seen from United States
Female figurines, Gravettian period (35-22ka)
From left to right: Willendorf, Monpazier, Dolní Věstonice, Frasassi, Sireuil, Laussel, Laussel, Kostyonki III, Kostyonki IV, Moravany, Renancourt, Laussel
Calanais Stone Circle, Isle of Lewis, Scotland
alexmilton_photo
Prehistoric 'Swimming' Reindeer Mammoth Tusk Carving, 'Ice Age Art Now' Exhibition, Cliffe Castle, Keighley, Yorkshire
Posed with their chins up, antlers tipped back, and legs outstretched, the reindeer appear to be swimming as they do when crossing lakes and rivers on migration. This made the best use of the tapering tip of the mammoth tusk. The wavy lines on the male's face may represent water.
Montastruc rockshelter, Midi-Pyrenees, France British Museum, Palart.550
'Young Reindeer With Its Mother' Bone Carving, 'Ice Age Art Now' Exhibition, Cliffe Castle, Keighley, Yorkshire
Around 15,000 years ago, as winter turned to spring, feelings of hope perhaps inspired this superb, engraved drawing of a reindeer calf alongside its mother on bone.
La Madeleine Rockshelter, Dordogne, France
A Wooly Mammoth Valentine
Woolly Mammoth by Charles Robert Knight
started thinking about the so called venus figurines of the palaeolithic and it sure is often that you see all kinds of interpretations based on the goddess hypothesis, to the point that you'd think the evidence for the venus figurines representing a mother goddess is solid
but in reality it very much is not. we have no idea what they represent
could the goddess hypothesis interpretation of them all representing a singular mother goddess be correct? sure. i personally find it very unlikely due to it oversimplifying upper palaeolithic and mesolithic societies (which, after all, represent a complicated web of different communities with different customs and ideas and people spanning tens of thousands of years) to a simply unrealistic degree (with a heavy dose of wishful thinking), but it isn't impossible
but they could also be toys. or representative of ancestors. or self portraits for purely artistic reasons. or an evil spirit portrayed in order keep misfortune at bay. or a medical tool from a society where the line between medicine and magic was nonexistent. or porn. or what i find most most realistic; representing different things in different cultures
until we build a time machine and can go back and ask them we will never know for certain. and personally i think that the uncertainty is one of the things that makes stone age archaeology so interesting!