Sad but true: often, when I read poetry or prose dating before 1800 (excepting Shakespeare, of course), I expect that the sentiments the author expresses will be none to relevant. We are so far removed from those times, places, and people, I just assume that the writer could speak only of his or her own first world problems and nothing of mine. And, almost every time, I am wrong. The following sonnet is by Sir Phillip Sidney, a poet whose work is considered canonical by lit professors everywhere, and whose musings are very much part of the Anti-Living dogma.
Sonnet #1 from Astrophil and Stella
Loving in truth, and fain in verse my love to show, That she (dear She) might take some pleasure of my pain: Pleasure might cause her read, reading might make her know, Knowledge might pity win, and pity grace obtain;
I sought fit words to paint the blackest face of woe, Studying inventions fine, her wits to entertain: Oft turning others' leaves, to see if thence would flow Some fresh and fruitful showers upon my sun-burn'd brain.
But words came halting forth, wanting Invention's stay, Invention, Nature's child, fled step-dame Study's blows, And others' feet still seem'd but strangers in my way.
Thus, great with child to speak, and helpless in my throes, Biting my truant pen, beating myself for spite-- "Fool," said my Muse to me, "look in thy heart and write."