#pjgarvin

[tossingwalnuts]

Loving children only leads to being a serial killer anyway.

@finalproblem

[love-y-o-u-3000]

pjgarvin replied to your post “the fact that there are two seemingly identical scenes but not really...”

I also found it totally weird that they showed nearly the ENTIRE conversation about the anti-christ baby, not "just enough" to get the point and set up the texting bit. Why so much all over again? We are supposed to notice something. Something...

Where is the meta about the religious symbols in Sherlock when you need it... wasn’t there a meta somewhere about Sherlock representing Christ on the show? well... that would surely make someone, the villain of the entire story, the oe obstacle between Sherlock and John... the real Moriarty, the anti-christ... and her baby too... yes, definitely, we are meant to notice something about that scene, one of them is real one of them is not or maybe neither of them are

[221beemine]

Ipjgarvin replied to your post “Feeling chatty. Send asks if you like. Anon is fine.”

 Do you think it's a wig?

I think there may be some extensions involved around the back but from what I’ve seen of other events he does have some bangs growing. So...yes and no. Quantum wig.

[notagarroter]

pjgarvin replied to your post: Word Association Game Elle: Girls Cu...

Ohhhh… I think that was the fear of being judged for whatever he would say. The whole “game” was peppered with his fear of being judged by what his responses were. What an awkward thing that was!

I agree, and it *was* awkward.  I really just think the whole concept of Elle magazine appropriating feminism for its own goals is kind of squicky.  But I don't expect Cumberbatch to understand that.