Douglass's scenes of forcible sex and other violent subjections introduce the ongoing processes of subjectification during slavery and into post-slavery to which all postmodern subjects are made subject. These are subjections, I argue, that are most readable and locatable still through the horrors enacted on the black body after slavery and the official periods of emancipation and through further colonialism, imperialism, and the relative freedoms of segregation, desegregation, and independence, whether that body is in the Caribbean, the Americas, England, or post-independence Africa. That is, while all modern subjects are post-slavery subjects fully constituted by the discursive codes of slavery and post-slavery, post-slavery subjectivity is largely borne by and readable on the (New World) *black* subject. Thinking about monstrous intimacies post-slavery means examining those subjectivities constituted from trans-atlantic slavery onward and connected, then as now, by the everyday mundane horrors that aren't acknowledged to be horrors. It means articulating a diasporic study that is attentive to but not dependent upon nations and nationalisms and that is linked, in different forms during slavery and into the present freedoms, by monstrous intimacies, defined as a set of known and unknown performances and inhabited horrors, desires and positions produced, reproduced, circulated, and transmitted, that are breathed in like air and often unacknowledged to be monstrous.
Christina Sharpe, Monstrous Intimacies: Making Post-Slavery Subjects (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010), 3.