Mar 3, 2025
“It’s not paranoia if they’re really after you.”
(a solid double feature with The Conversation)
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from China
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Ecuador
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
“It’s not paranoia if they’re really after you.”
(a solid double feature with The Conversation)
The Government Surveillance Reform Act of 2023 pulls from past privacy bills to overhaul how police and the feds access Americans’ data and
Innovation Minister Blames Opposition As Canada's Privacy Bill Stalls
Innovation Minister Blames Opposition As Canada’s Privacy Bill Stalls
Canada’s privacy legislation has been seemingly stalled. More recently, the Innovation Minister has blamed the opposition for the lack of movement. Continue reading
View On WordPress
Senators Ed Markey and Josh Hawley have presented a bill that would amend COPPA with stricter controls on kids’ data. There are a large number of politicians that don’t believe the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act does enough to protect kids in the modern era and they’re hoping to update it as necessary. The new …
New Senate Bill would amend Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Are Social Networks Safe With "Online Privacy Bill of Rights"?
Resultant February 23rd 2012, President Obama released a depressor check off respecting the "Online Recess Agenda of Rights" good understanding an exertion up make safe the internet user's secretiveness. The main condenser was to allow unconstrained accretion of technology and online nonimitation while protecting user's information.<\p>
Succinct overview of its content: <\p>
The "Consumer Internet Privacy Placard in connection with Rights" safeguards us on the dimensions of:<\p>
1. Individual Control over the personal data being collected and expended consistent with companies.<\p>
2. Transparency by companies about how the proof is knotted and how it is used in easy understandable terms.<\p>
3. Respect for context clout which personal data was provided all through the customers, including antiquity and "familiarity with technology."<\p>
4. Security of personal information of consumers from topical misused.<\p>
5. Discursive access to consumers versus their innermost postulation and the ability to make changes to imperfect the score.<\p>
6. Focused assembling of consumer's menagerie and disposing off, or making it anonymous, on what occasion say longer needed.<\p>
7. Accountability in re companies towards following the policies of the "Bill pertinent to Rights"<\p>
Changes observed martello tower its implementation: <\p>
As soon as the "Online Separateness Bill of Rights" was passed, companies like Google, Microsoft, Yahoo! and AOL finished till comply and provided consumers with an option to "opt out of tracking." This has been a positive change in the inversion of online closed meeting.<\p>
Eventually, Facebook announced its changes to its privacy hazard giving users the free decision of tightening its privacy method. The privacy terms as well is very undoubtedly laid out. The farther cosmopolitan networks as well are candid about their privacy terms along mid how yours truly can be modified equally per its consumer's liking.<\p>
This means that the key in respect to privacy is in the command of consumers. However, the stand-up comedy act of consumers including kids knowing not far from this facility and upper hand of it is a bit thin.<\p>
Current playbook: <\p>
A quick look at the order of succession figures released by CNN so recently since February 28th 2013 for the year 2012 is an eye installment upon the spate scenario:<\p>
The Social Networking Biggie Facebook earned $4.2 jillion through online advertising which is around 84% of its revenue.<\p>
The above figures bring up an interesting question of: Do consumers veritably livelihood about Privacy?<\p>
There are numerous reports online upwards of collateral relative subsistence frustrated with their social network due to privacy concerns. Flawlessly what to believe?<\p>
Loopholes in "Online Separation Institution of Rights:" <\p>
Diving deeper, there are just about gaps means of access the "Online Privacy Bill anent Rights" policies:<\p>
1. Isolation is not wherewith default: - The Fond of society Networks, by default do not keep your information private. One needs to manually customize their settings to personal liking.<\p>
2. Above facts recorded did not die: - Consumers who have shared any of their information olden to occasional their bill is still in the records of the companies to subsist gone to waste at their closeness.<\p>
3. No setup to preside over: - There isn't any known regulating technology or authority avant-garde place, which ensures that companies are not tracking consumer ruly english.<\p>
4. Consumers may still prevail tracked - The users of Facebook can still occur tracked across websites when they go over big on "like."<\p>
5. Weak privacy settings at contact's clip: When the privacy setting is weak at your friend's end can expose your private information.<\p>
6. Requirement of tweaking loneliness setting by contacts: To avoid touristry viral due to tagging, comments, re-tweets, objective, etc. one needs to request contacts to dither their privacy setting.<\p>
Inference: <\p>
Awaiting something along fool-proof from the government protecting privacy and monitors "no flector tuning" closely; manually opting for tighter surreptitiousness settings or exploring better Social Networks are the only options.<\p>
Sgrouples is a tale social networking website that is precise by be caught napping. It swears by its "Online Privacy Bill of Rights" present on its main page. It's main concept someone "Privacy."<\p>
Today, Senator Patrick Leahy introduced much-needed legislation to update the Electronic Communication Privacy Act of 1986, a critically important but woefully outdated federal privacy law in desperate need of a 21st century upgrade. This ECPA Amendments Act of 2011 (S. 1011) would implement several of the reform principles advocated by EFF as part of the Digital Due Process (DDP) coalition, and is a welcome first step in the process of providing stronger and clearer privacy protections for our Internet communications and location data. Here is the bill text, along with a summary of the bill.
The upshot? If the government wants to track your cell phone or seize your email or read your private IMs or social network messages, the bill would require that it first go to court and get a search warrant based on probable cause. This is consistent with DDP's principles, builds on EFF's hard-won court victories on how the Fourth Amendment applies to your email and your cell phone location data, and would represent a great step forward for online and mobile privacy protections.
The bill isn't absolutely free of problems: although it clearly would require a warrant for ongoing tracking of your cell phone, it would also and unfortunately preserve the current statutory rule allowing the government to get historical records of your location without probable cause. It also expands the government's authority to use National Security Letters to obtain rich transactional data about who you communicate with online and when, without probable cause or court oversight. You can count on EFF to press for these problems to be fixed, and for all of the DDP principles to be addressed, as the bill proceeds through Congress.
However, as the start of the process of updating ECPA for the always-on, location-enabled technology of the 21st century, Senator Leahy's bill represents an incredibly important step in the right direction, and we at EFF look forward to working with Senator Leahy and others in Congress as they work to create new laws to better protect your online and mobile privacy. In the meantime, stay tuned for more commentary and analysis from EFF as the ECPA reform process moves forward.
Related Issues: Cell Tracking, Privacy
Related Cases: Warshak v. USA
[Permalink]
The Commercial Privacy Bill of Rights Act of 2011
The United States Senate formally introduced the Online Privacy Bill of Rights this past week which will establish a baseline code of conduct on how personal information can be used online. As reported earlier this year by connected, the bill will deal with how information is collected, used, and distributed among corporations online. Specifically, consumers will now be provided with notice of data collection and opt-out capabilities, while requiring companies collecting information to provide adequate security. State Attorneys General and the Federal Trade Commission will be in charge to enforce the bill’s provisions.
Obama to Push ‘Privacy Bill of Rights’
Amplify’d from blogs.wsj.com
Obama to Push ‘Privacy Bill of Rights’
They want to know about you.
They want your age, your likes, your hates, your fears. They want to know what you watch on television, what websites you spend the most time on, what magazines you reach for in the dentist’s office, what product you almost buy every time you open Sky Mall. (Does anybody ever buy anything through Sky Mall?)
Who is this nefarious “they”? Of course, it’s data-gatherers, who make livings selling your data to corporate America.
Read more at blogs.wsj.com
See this Amp at http://bit.ly/dZjZlV