#prop 32

[hvw8]

Just said 'No to Prop 32' ... money can't buy you love. Produced at HVW8.

[elexcoverage-blog]

[quiniferous]

PROPOSITION INFORMATION -- CA VOTERS

okay this is 100% how I am voting -- this is not what the Democrats are doing, persay, or what progressives in general are doing, not what CalSERVE is doing, nope, just me me me.

Prop 30: Yes

Prop 31: No

Prop 32: No

Prop 33: No

Prop 34: Yes

Prop 35: Abstain

Prop 36: Yes

Prop 37: Yes

Prop 38: Abstain

Prop 39: Yes

Prop 40: Yes

Longer version under the cut.

Prop 30: YES

If you're a University of California, California State University, or California Community College student who votes NO on Prop 30, you are hurting yourself and you are hurting all of your fellow students. WE WILL FACE A 20% TUITION HIKE IF THIS PROPOSITION FAILS. 

It is actually that simple. It raises taxes on people who make $250,000 or more a year, and raises sales taxes a bit, yes. But I would rather have the burden on the wealthy (and a little bit on everyone else, since sales tax DOES affect poorer folks more than it affects richer folks) than have a burden on students who are ALREADY PAYING TOO DAMN MUCH FOR AN EDUCATION.

If Prop 30 doesn't pass, we're closing the door to a lot of great potential students for the sake of the well-off.

Prop 31: NO

I just don't see the benefit of a Two-Year State Budget Cycle, it just seems more confusing and chaotic. Things vary year-to-year, and this was only supported by one organization, which makes me wary. Additionally, Republicans are in favor and Democrats are opposed. 

Prop 32: NO

This proposition DISGUSTS me. It appears to be trying to make campaign finance reform, when it is honestly just making it nearly impossible for unions to donate money. It has to do with banning payroll contributions for "both corporations and unions" but guess what? CORPORATIONS DON'T USE PAYROLL CONTRIBUTIONS. UNIONS DO. The corporations will easily find ways to continue to donate money, and unions will have their hands tied.

It's bad enough, in my opinion, that corporations can donate tons of money -- but to make it even HARDER for unions and workers and normal people? VOTE NO ON PROP 32. 

Prop 33: NO

Prop 33 is only sponsored by Mercury Insurance so it just seems like a huge monopoly waiting to happen. I don't see any benefits and it just seems like a way to make a certain group of people pay more. I don't know what group that is, but I just don't like this proposition. 

Prop 34: YES

YES YES YES A THOUSAND TIMES YES. This proposition would make California forgo the use of the death penalty.

Look, even if you don't mind that OUR GOVERNMENT KILLS ITS CITIZENS, the death penalty costs us TONS of money every year, and the convicts still live a long time before they're put to death. It's a huge financial burden, and that money could go to rehabilitation or education.

Oh, and also, I don't think the state should kill people. But you know. Whatever.

Prop 35: Abstain

It doesn't exactly do what it pretends it would, but I cannot bring myself to vote against increasing punishment on sex-traffickers.

Prop 36: YES

Prop 36 would reform the "three strikes" law. The "three strikes" law is fucked up. Basically, if you commit three criminal offenses, you're sent to prison for life. Again, HUGE WASTE OF RESOURCES. 

Oh, and if you care about people's lives... this "three strikes" bullshit means that people have to spend their LIFE in jail for stealing twice and being arrested for possession once. FOR LIFE. The punishment should fit the crime -- vote yes on Prop 36.

Prop 37: YES

This proposition would require companies label their food if it has GMO's (genetically modified organisms).

Look, I don't know how I feel about GMO's, but dammit, I like informed consumers. People have the right to know what they're putting in their bodies -- this won't make a stigma about GMO's, it's just a fact. You have to say how many calories are in the food you're selling, that hasn't deterred people from buying high-calorie foods! INFORMATION IS GOOD.

And just think about the future -- maybe 20 years from now we find out that GMO's actually, generally, make people live longer. Great!! Good thing I knew I was eating GMO's. Maybe we find out GMO's are somehow harmful -- well, good thing the companies labeled that their products had GMO's so I don't sue them.

Informed consumers = good. Vote YES on Prop 37.

  Prop 38: Abstain

This is just funded by ONE individual, and I would prefer money be shared with UCs, CSUs, CCs, and K-12, not just K-12 schools. One tax increase is enough -- and we need to vote YES on Prop 30.

  Prop 39: YES

Closing tax loopholes to make more green jobs? Yes please.

    Prop 40: YES

Republicans are fucking stupid. They whined about how the redistricting wasn't fair, boohoo -- then they put this on the ballot and now they won't even campaign for it because they realized it was a waste of time. If this doesn't pass, WE WILL HAVE TO BE REDISTRICTED AGAIN. UGH. THESE NEW DISTRICTS ARE GREAT. VOTE YES ON PROP 40.

[jcrewtraphouse]

California voters, please pay attention to the props.

30: Please vote yes

31: Please vote no

32: Please vote no

33: I have not come to a conclusion on that one(which is really bad, because the election is so close)

34:  Please vote yes

35: Please vote yes

36: Please vote yes

37: Please vote yes

38: Please vote no

39: Please vote yes

40: Please vote yes

Although I would like you to vote like I am going to, you can go here to form your own opinions

http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/propositions/

[plusminus36]

Light union history + vote No on 32

[kvit1yn]

school.

[sandypolitics-blog]

California Proposition 32, the "Paycheck Protection" Initiative (2012)

Short version - What does it do?

Prohibits unions and corporations from using payroll-deducted funds for political contributions.

Fiscal impact:

Increased costs to state and local government, potentially exceeding $1 million annually, to implement and enforce the measure's requirements.

Pro arguments:

Corporations and unions make sizable donations to politicians, which influences the way that they vote. Prohibiting these donations will allow individual voters to have more of a say.

Union members should decide for themselves where their money goes. They should not be forced into donating to a cause they may not necessarily believe in.

Con arguments:

Prop. 32 is unbalanced and will affect unions more than corporations, since corporations rarely use payroll-deducted funds for political purposes while unions rely heavily on it.

It is unconstitutional, restricting freedom of speech.

Union members can already opt-out of having their union dues used for politics.

Links:

Text of California Proposition 32 (November 2012)

Ballotpedia.org

Website for Yes on 32

Website for No on 32

Videos:

Craig and Lou go to the ballot box: Prop. 32 (Argument against)

Debate over Prop 32

The Darryl Johnson Show on Prop. 32 (Argument in favor of)

[agoodcartoon]

Cartoonist Steve Breen understands that Dorothy is clearly the bloodthirsty villain of the story and uses metaphor accordingly. A good cartoon.